Skip to main content

Rise of the Tomb Raider is probably not releasing in January

rise tomb raider probably not releasing january of the lara croft games baba yaga
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Word started spreading this morning that Rise of the Tomb Raider would be releasing not just somewhere in “early 2016,” as Square had initially stated, but specifically by the end of January, as an Amazon listing on the French version of the site said as much. While that would make sense considering poor sales of the game as part of its Xbox One exclusivity, the listing has already been corrected to March 31.

This doesn’t guarantee of course that the game will come out at the end of March, as there has been no news from Square either way and there are no listings on other sites to that effect. It may be that following the January screw-up, someone has bumped it forward a couple of months to prevent Ubisoft throwing its toys out of the pram.

Until the actual release date is confirmed, we just don’t know. It is a good sign that there are no indications that it’s coming out later than originally announced, though, given that Rise of the Tomb Raider didn’t even break the top 10 last month in terms of games sales despite receiving almost unanimously strong reviews from major publications.

It did however release on the same date as Fallout 4, arguably one of the biggest launches of the year — which seems like a poor choice (as per PCGamer) and the decision to restrict itself to the less popular of the two major console systems was always going to limit sales.

Although this might be sad news for anyone who was excited by the prospect of exploring new tombs with the ever-raiding Lara, it’s good to see that the PC port isn’t being rushed through. All we need to do is look at any of the big PC ports from console games in recent years – Assassin’s Creed Unity and Batman: Arkham Knight being two of the worst — to see that if you don’t give PC ports enough time and care, they look and play terribly.

And in some cases they don’t work at all, for months, which is awful PR for that game and the developer. Ubisoft’s Assassin’s Creed Syndicate sales were down this year, partly because of the poor performance of Unity the year before.

Editors' Recommendations

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is the Evergreen Coordinator for Computing, overseeing a team of writers addressing all the latest how to…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more