Skip to main content

Hacker steals more than $7 million in digital currency by switching a mere link

A render of virtual currency.
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Security firm Tripwire reports that a hacker managed to steal more than $7 million in digital currency by simply replacing a single link. The hack took place on Monday during an event called an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) to reel in investors of a cryptocurrency app called CoinDash. However, early investors quickly discovered that a link for depositing digital currency on the CoinDash website was not legitimate.

According to Tripwire, trading platform CoinDash began its ICO at 1 p.m. (GMT). Three minutes later, investors figured out that the link for sending Ether, a type of digital currency, was taking them to the wrong deposit location. Within those three minutes, the hacker managed to accumulate more than $7 million before CoinDash terminated the ICO and removed the page.

“The moment the token sale went public, the CoinDash website was hacked and a malicious address replaced the CoinDash Token Sale address,” CoinDash said. “As a result, more than 2,000 investors sent ETH to the malicious address. The stolen ETH amounted to a total of 37,000 ETH.”

Ether is the digital currency of the world’s second most popular cryptocurrency network, Ethereum. This platform consists of smart contracts, which are essentially bits of code that will execute when certain requirements are fulfilled. These “apps” are listed on the Ethereum network using what is called a blockchain, which serves as a registry that records all transactions. Ether, abbreviated as ETH, is what’s used to pay for things and services listed on the Ethereum network.

So why not just use real world cash? Because digital currency is decentralized. It’s not managed by banks or the government. Plus, both the merchant and buyer can remain completely anonymous, with a transaction digitally signed and verified by an unknown miner on the associated network. Ether is similar to Bitcoin in purpose although technically they are completely different digital currencies.

Individuals who successfully participated in a private “heads up” for whitelist contributors 15 minutes prior to the public ICO received “tokens” as proof of their CoinDash app investment. However, those who invested Ether using the hacked address are reportedly now demanding a refund. After all, the CoinDash website was not locked down tight, enabling a hacker to insert a simple link that collected millions in stolen digital currency.

However, many Ether users reportedly flocked to social networks and questioned the theft. Was this a genuine hack, or a simple scam using a hack as a cover story? As Tripwire states, there is no evidence to suggest foul play.

CoinDash is currently providing an online form for victims to complete as part of the company’s forensic investigation into the hack. Victims are asked to provide their email address, wallet address, a proven transaction number, and the amount of Ether sent.

“This was a damaging event to both our contributors and our company but it is surely not the end of our project,” CoinDash added. “We are looking into the security breach and will update you all as soon as possible about the findings. We are still under attack. Please do not send any ETH to any address, as the Token Sale has been terminated.”

Despite the hack, CoinDash said that it managed to secure $6.4 million from early contributors and whitelist participants in the 15-minute “heads up” prior to the ICO. Those who sent digital currency to the wrong Ether address during the hack will still receive tokens. Otherwise, investors who sent Ether to the wrong address after CoinDash removed the ICO page will not receive investment tokens.

Update: Added new information provided by CoinDash.

Kevin Parrish
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kevin started taking PCs apart in the 90s when Quake was on the way and his PC lacked the required components. Since then…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more