Skip to main content

Start-up Pure Storage uses exclusively flash-based storage

Image used with permission by copyright holder

It’s doubtless that one day flash storage, like SSDs, will replace hard disks for data centers and enterprise storage. SSDs are generally faster, more reliable and use less power than hard disks. As usual in the tech world, the question is who’s going to make the first leap, and when’s it going to happen?

There have already been a bunch of start-ups looking to cash in with all-flash storage solutions, but one in particular made a big splash this week: Pure Storage announced it raised $30 million in fresh capital while unveiling an flash-storage array that’s nearly ready for market.

The Pure Storage FlashArray FA-300 Series is the stuff IT guys dreamed of only recently. It’s a purpose-built flash array, unlike the flash-disk hybrids that are more commonly available now, that the company claims is ten times faster and ten times more space efficient than current hard disk offerings.

Using custom software to control data flow and write/rewrite processes, Pure Storage says its array can achieve a twenty-time reduction in inline data; in other words, the firm claims that using its flash storage for servers and the like can reduce workflow data transfers by up to 95%. The array comes in sizes from 10 to 100 terabytes at an estimate cost of $5 per usable gigabyte.

As impressive as Pure Storage’s offering is, it’s hardly the only player in the game, and lags behind others in terms of bringing a product to market. As far as other start-ups are concerned,  Violin Memory has leaped out to become the current favorite. The company’s already gathered $310 million in financing, and with products already on the market, expects to eclipse $100 million in sales this year.

On the slightly smaller end, Nimbus Data Systems doesn’t have the kind of numbers Violin Memory has, but it has proven profitable. Even better for the company, it’s already scored a couple hundred contracts including one with eBay.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Derek Mead
Former Digital Trends Contributor
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more