Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Emerging Tech
  4. News

Timekettle’s new X1 Meeting Hub does real-time translation for 50 people and fits in your pocket

Fifty participants, five languages, one 199-gram hub, and no booth required.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Electronics, Screen, Computer Hardware
Timekettle

Professional conference interpretation setups are notoriously painful. Dedicated booths, trained interpreters, bulky hardware, and a bill at the end of every month that makes you rethink whether the meeting was even required in the first place. 

Timekettle wants to collapse all of that into a single hub that weighs 199 grams (less than modern flagship smartphones). The company just launched the X1 Meeting Interpreter Hub. 

So how does the device actually work?

It is a portable AI translation device that handles real-time interpretation for a team of up to 50 participants across up to five languages simultaneously. Timekettle claims that the interpreter supports a total of 52 languages, with 106 accents, something that can benefit multinational companies. 

Recommended Videos

Presenters or active speakers use dedicated X1 Meeting earbuds. They use bone-voiceprint noise reduction, along with multi-microphone processing to pick up voices clearly, even in loud rooms. The earbuds look a bit outdated to me, but if they solve the purpose, nobody cares. 

Everyone else, including those joining remotely, can follow along by scanning a QR code or by clicking a meeting link on their phone, tablet, or laptop. Nobody needs to download and install any additional apps.

Is there a catch worth knowing about?

The company claims to offer translated audio and live text on their devices (with headphones they’re already using). 

Meeting transcripts are stored locally on 32GB of onboard storage, and not on the cloud. For larger gatherings, you can sync up to 10 hubs together, pairing wirelessly within 16 feet, and export the required data via the USB-C port

The catch you’re looking for could be hidden in the price, especially for small business owners or teams operating from make-shift offices. The device costs $849 at launch and is available via Amazon today.

Shikhar Mehrotra
For more than five years, Shikhar has consistently simplified developments in the field of consumer tech and presented them…
Google’s new Magic Pointer Play Store listing reveals a Gemini shortcut built for Googlebooks
The unannounced app turns the cursor into a contextual AI tool for search, image creation, and shopping
Plant, Text, Business Card

Google has quietly published a new Play Store listing for Magic Pointer, an unannounced app built for Googlebooks. Updated on July 10, the app turns the cursor into a Gemini shortcut that can act on whatever a user selects on screen.

Magic Pointer can send an image to Lens, generate a related image, or surface a shopping action without forcing users to open a separate chatbot. Regular Android devices currently show as incompatible, so the listing offers an early preview rather than a broad release.

Read more
You can stop using AI, but this new report says you probably can’t escape it
A UK survey found that most people feel AI exposure is unavoidable, raising harder questions about consent, privacy, and whether opting out is still realistic
AI Chatbots

More people are trying to use less AI, but avoiding it altogether may already be impossible.

A survey of 2,055 UK adults found that 42% deliberately limit how much AI they use. Another 70% said avoiding AI exposure would be difficult or impossible, even when they actively wanted less of it.

Read more
The face on an AI interviewer may matter as much as the decision it makes
Researchers found that race and gender matching changed how fairly rejected applicants viewed an automated interview, even though everyone received the same outcome
File, Computer Hardware, Electronics

An AI hiring system can treat every applicant the same and still leave some people feeling targeted. Researchers found that rejected candidates judged an automated interview differently depending on the race and gender of the avatar delivering the result.

Around 220 participants completed a simulated interview for a fictional customer support role with one of four photorealistic AI avatars. Everyone was rejected, yet perceptions of fairness shifted with the interviewer’s appearance. An algorithm audit could miss that reaction because candidates don’t experience the system as raw code. They experience a face asking questions and judging their answers.

Read more