Skip to main content

U.S. Identifies Programmer Behind Google Cyberattack?

Image used with permission by copyright holder

The Financial Times is reporting (registration required) that U.S. analysts believe they have identified the specific individual who is primarily responsible for authoring the “Aurora” cyberattack launched against Google and other businesses operating in China. The man, described as a security consultant in his 30s, apparently works as a freelancer and did not launch the attack himself, but developed the core technology used in the attack and posted some portions of his programming to a hacking forum, where he described it as something he was “working on.” The Financial Times also quotes sources alleging Chinese officials had “special access” to his code, saying that no one at this programmer’s level of skill is able to work without cooperating with Chinese authorities.

The attack against Google and other businesses operating in China used a previously unknown fault in Internet Explorer to penetrate Google’s internal network, and apparently focused on getting information and credentials for accounts used by Chinese human rights activists. Google disclosed the incident, proclaiming that it was done with complying with Chinese requirements to censor search results and might pull out of China entirely; the incident also has Google pondering a partnership with the National Security Agency, the United States’ largest—and most secretive—intelligence organization.

Recommended Videos

The incident has also impacted diplomatic relations between the United States and China, with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton delivering a pointed policy speech that, for the first time, outlined Internet freedoms as a key point of U.S. foreign policy.

The Chinese government has repeatedly insisted it had no role in the attacks against Google or other companies. China furthermore insists that if companies want to do business in China that they must conform to Chinese law—which includes Internet censorship. China further characterizes the United States’ stance on Internet freedoms as little more than 21st-century cultural imperialism.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
The U.S. finally put its foot down on AI image copyright
Théâtre D'opéra Spatial, a Midjourney image that won first prize in a digital art competition

AI generated works of art may be eligible to win awards at state fairs, but they are not protected under American copyright law, according to new guidance issued by the U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) on Wednesday.

The report details ways in which AI-generated video, images, and text may, and may not, be copyright protected. It finds that while generative AI is a new technology, its outputs largely fall under existing copyright rules meaning that no new laws will need to be enacted to address the issue. Unfortunately for AI content creators, the protections that are available are thin.

Read more
TP-Link routers could get banned from the U.S. as early as next year
The TP-Link Archer AXE7800 tri-band Wi-Fi 6E router in a room.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Washington is investigating the most popular home internet router brand due to its possible links to China-backed cyberattacks. The Justice and Defense, and Commerce departments are investigating the router brand, and the Commerce Department is subpoenaing the company.

As the report indicates, the investigation could lead to a potential ban on the popular router brand as early as next year, as the attacks targeted Defense Department suppliers, government organizations, non-government organizations, and think tanks. The ban could be a massive hit for the router brand, which holds about 65% of the U.S. market and, as mentioned in the report, is even a router used by the Department of Defense and NASA.

Read more
U.S. government to Google: sell Chrome
Google Chrome browser running on Android Automotive in a car.

Google might have to sell Chrome, despite its ranking as the best browser you can use. After ruling that Google has illegally monopolized the search market, the U.S. Department of Justice is pushing for Google to sell off Chrome to break up its search dominance. Chrome currently represents over 65% of the browser market, far ahead of any competitors.

According to Bloomberg's reporting, officials from the DOJ and several states who have joined the case will recommend to federal judge Amit Mehta that Google sell off Chrome in order to rebalance the scales. Google parent company Alphabet has been involved in the lawsuit since early 2020. In August, Mehta ruled that Google illegally obtained a search monopoly and called for sanctions against the tech giant.

Read more