Skip to main content

The U.S. finally put its foot down on AI image copyright

Théâtre D'opéra Spatial, a Midjourney image that won first prize in a digital art competition
Midjourney

AI generated works of art may be eligible to win awards at state fairs, but they are not protected under American copyright law, according to new guidance issued by the U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) on Wednesday.

The report details ways in which AI-generated video, images, and text may, and may not, be copyright protected. It finds that while generative AI is a new technology, its outputs largely fall under existing copyright rules meaning that no new laws will need to be enacted to address the issue. Unfortunately for AI content creators, the protections that are available are thin.

Recommended Videos

The courts have already ruled that AI systems themselves cannot hold copyright. The Supreme Court specified in the 1989 case, Cmty. for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid (“CCNV”), that “the author [of a copyrighted work] is . . . the person [emphasis added] who translates an idea into a fixed, tangible expression entitled to copyright protection.”

Pointing to the inherent unpredictability of an AI’s output to a given query, the USCO’s guidance argues that AI prompts don’t offer the user a sufficient degree of control over the generative process to “make users of an AI system the authors of the output.” That’s regardless of how complex and expansive the prompt is.

“No matter how many times a prompt is revised and resubmitted, the final output reflects the user’s acceptance of the AI system’s interpretation, rather than authorship of the expression it contains,” the report reads. In short, “the issue is the degree of human control, rather than the predictability of the outcome.”

That denial of protection does have its limits however. For example, the 2024 Robert Zemekis film “Here,” which featured digitally de-aged Tom Hanks and Robin Wright, has been copyrighted, despite its use of generative technologies to do the de-aging. This is because the AI is wielded as a tool rather than treated like a producer. Similarly, the USCO argues that “a film that includes AI-generated special effects or background artwork is copyrightable, even if the AI effects and artwork separately are not.”

Artists are also covered, to a degree, if they’re using an AI system to further modify their existing human-made creative works. The AI-generated elements in the resulting content wouldn’t be copyrightable (since they were generated by the AI) but the overall artistic piece, and its “perceptible human expression,” would be.

This issue is not a new one. As far back as 1965 with the advent of computers, the USCO has been wrestling with the question of authorship as to whether content produced on digital platforms is the work of human authors or simply “written” by the computers.

“The crucial question appears to be whether the “work” is basically one of human authorship, with the computer merely being an assisting instrument,” Then-Register of Copyrights Abraham Kaminstein noted at the time, “or whether the traditional elements of authorship in the work (literary, artistic, or musical expression or elements of selection, arrangement, etc.) were actually conceived and executed not by man but by a machine.”

The USCO notes that its guidance on the issue could evolve in the coming years as the technology further matures. “In theory, AI systems could someday allow users to exert so much control over how their expression is reflected in an output that the system’s contribution would become rote or mechanical,” the report reads. However, the USCO has found that modern AI prompts simply do not yet rise to that level.

Andrew Tarantola
Andrew Tarantola is a journalist with more than a decade reporting on emerging technologies ranging from robotics and machine…
It’s not just you: ChatGPT is currently down
OpenAI and ChatGPT logos are marked do not enter with a red circle and line symbol.

OpenAI's ChatGPT platform and Sora video generator have gone offline and are currently not responding to user queries.

Social media accounts began posting about the outage around 1:30 p.m. ET on Thursday, which coincided with a surge of reports to Down Detector. The company confirmed the outage in a blog post at 2 p.m. ET stating, "we are currently experiencing an issue with high error rates on ChatGPT, the API, and Sora. We are currently investigating and will post an update as soon as we are able."

Read more
OpenAI teases its ‘breakthrough’ next-generation o3 reasoning model
Sam Altman describing the o3 model's capabilities

For the finale of its 12 Days of OpenAI livestream event, CEO Sam Altman revealed its next foundation model, and successor to the recently announced o1 family of reasoning AIs, dubbed o3 and 03-mini.

And no, you aren't going crazy -- OpenAI skipped right over o2, apparently to avoid infringing on the copyright of British telecom provider O2.

Read more
I tried out Google’s latest AI tool that generates images in a fun, new way
Google's Whisk AI tool being used with images.

Google’s latest AI tool helps you automate image generation even further. The tool is called Whisk, and it's based on Google’s latest Imagen 3 image generation model. Rather than relying solely on text prompts, Whisk helps you create your desired images using other images as the base prompt.

Whisk is currently in an experimental phase, but once set up it's fairly easy to navigate. Google detailed in a blog post introducing Whisk that it is intended for “rapid visual exploration, not pixel-perfect edits.”

Read more