Skip to main content

Viacom, YouTube Suit Attracts More Heavyweights

A proxy battle between Hollywood and Silicon Valley is beginning to take shape in the courts. In one corner, Viacom- the media conglomerate that owns Paramount, MTV films, and over 30 television channels. Standing behind them are Hollywood heavyweights Warner Bros., NBC Universal, Disney, the Screen Actors Guild and the Directors Guild of America. In the opposite corner, weighing in as the most viewed website on the planet, Google! Google’s corner team includes Yahoo, Facebook, and eBay.

The title bout between the Hollywood team and the internet groups began when Viacom filed a $1 billion suit against YouTube and its parent company Google, claiming massive copyright infringement. The suit alleged that users had uploaded enough copyrighted material, frequently enough, that it caused a revenue hit to Viacom. Viacom specifically claimed that 63,000 copyrighted works were being displayed on YouTube, and it asked a New York judge for a summary judgment ruling in its favor. The Hollywood groups supporting Viacom also filed amicus briefs, which are legal motions by parties not directly involved in the litigation, but who are willing to offer information to help assist the court.

Google fought back and claimed that YouTube was protected under the Federal Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which claims that a service provider is not liable for infringement if it removes material when notified by the copyright owner. Google also asked for a summary judgment. This week, Yahoo, Facebook and eBay have all filed amicus briefs in support of Google.

“The courts have been clear that creating and building a Web-based business on the intellectual property of others is illegal,” a Viacom spokesperson told Bloomberg. “That is exactly what YouTube did in its formative years. Nothing in this case threatens the principles of the DMCA or the ability of legitimate Internet-based businesses to flourish.”

The Football Association Premier League filed a similar suit against YouTube, claiming that the website infringed on copyrights regarding British soccer matches. The amicus briefs will carry over to this case as well.

“[Viacom’s] legal arguments, if accepted, would retard the development of the Internet and electronic commerce, create uncertainty for service providers regarding their legal exposure for alleged infringements, and inhabit the growth and development of user-centric online models that, day after day, make the Internet and the world more democratic.” The brief filed by Google states.

Regardless of the outcome, the stakes are beginning to grow, and both sides are gathering support, and one way or another, the results should end up shaping how we watch video content.

Editors' Recommendations

Ryan Fleming
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Ryan Fleming is the Gaming and Cinema Editor for Digital Trends. He joined the DT staff in 2009 after spending time covering…
How to save your data from Google’s purge of inactive accounts
The Google "G" logo on an Android phone.

Google is about to begin deleting inactive Google accounts, which could mean you’re about to lose photos, documents, and other data that you actually want to keep.

The good news is that there’s a way you can safely hold onto everything, but you’ll need to take action this week to be sure.

Read more
I couldn’t live without this simple desktop YouTube feature
YouTube app running on an Amazon Fire Max 11.

Big YouTube fan? I know I am. I have ASMR content rolling all day while I'm writing away, so yes, I'm one of those people who pays for YouTube Premium. But one feature I've been using a ton recently doesn't require a premium membership -- the excellent picture in picture mode.

I'm a big synthwave nerd too. That's not relevant, I just love The Midnight. Image used with permission by copyright holder
How to use YouTube picture in picture
If you typically watch YouTube on your phone, you've probably come across this feature already. You just swipe away from the app to 'exit' it while you're watching a video, and it will appear as a small window in the corner of your phone.

Read more
I dismantled my 8-year-old printer to replace a tiny piece of rubber — and it was so worth it
The Samsung Xpress C460FW on the operating table.

The Samsung Xpress C460FW multifunction laser printer – a reliable printer for eight years. eBay

In 2015, I ended my dysfunctional relationship with inkjet printers and bought a Samsung color laser printer. It was on sale at my local Staples for 50% off -- just $199 -- making it a no-brainer. As tech purchases go, it was a great decision. Over the last eight years, that printer has gotten our two kids through high school, helped me print an untold number of product return labels, and I’m pretty sure it has saved us hundreds on wasted ink cartridges that dried up between print jobs. That's not to mention the fact that it’s also a multifunction printer featuring a flatbed scanner with a document feeder. I mean, seriously, how was I able to buy this thing for $200?

Read more