Skip to main content

If Google is going to be a defacto monopoly, it needs to start acting like one

google-monopoly
Image used with permission by copyright holder

There’s a butcher in town, and his name is Google. Reader isn’t the sole victim of the company’s newfound love for the chopping block. Other recent victims include iGoogle, Knol, Picnik, Aardvark and Code Search. In total, Google has shut down over 45 services since 2006.

Google has the right to shut down whatever service it desires, but there’s a difference between what can be done and what should be done. While investors love companies that shut down unprofitable services, the public has a different opinion – and that opinion counts.  

The problem with dominance

Companies that manage to squash competitors still have to worry about public opinion and the government. Anti-trust laws dictate that no company can hold a monopoly on a market. This principle, though seemingly simple, is complex and has historically been mired with ambiguity. Companies that grow too large must constantly worry about the threat of an anti-trust lawsuit. 

And what a troublesome threat an anti-trust lawsuit can be. In a case that lasted from 1998 to 2001, Microsoft dodged a breakup by a hair in appeals court, arguably only because the original judge gave media interviews while still hearing the case. Intel was fined over $1.4 billion after losing an EU case, and has also reached settlements in Japan, South Korea, and the United States. Even Google paid $22.5 million to settle allegations that the company has misrepresented data.

The uneven enforcement of anti-trust law can strike companies off guard. A sudden change in public opinion, or a new administration in Washington, can turn previously tolerant regulators aggressive within a few years or months. Cutting services at the drop of the hat only aggravates an already volatile situation. Instead of turning inward, Google must protect itself with a proactive and public campaign similar to that used by the world’s most persistent monopoly in tech: AT&T.

The public face

AT&T managed its 70-year stranglehold on telecommunications in the United States by acting as a benevolent dictator. The company committed itself to “universal service” with a promise that AT&T would provide a base-level service to everyone at a fair rate, even if providing service to a particular individual wasn’t profitable. In addition, the company funded the world-famous Bell Labs and worked hand-in-hand with the government on numerous national works. AT&T helped build the radar stations that watched for Soviet bombers over the arctic, guaranteed communications throughout the country in times of crisis, and oversaw Sandia National Laboratories (one of America’s leading nuclear research facilities) until 1993.

belltelephone
Image used with permission by copyright holder

These efforts weren’t handouts. For decades, they generated new revenue while also letting the company run as a tolerated monopoly. AT&T believed that one system was the best solution for communications and made this belief a reality by ensuring that it was held in high regard by both the public and the government. Though antitrust investigations came to light, they were delayed or derailed for decades. Building an argument against a company that appeared to operate in the national interest proved nearly impossible.

The lesson here is clear:  if a company wants to dominate its market, it must also appear cooperative and sincere. Microsoft could have entirely avoided its anti-trust case if it had been upfront and willing to compromise. Instead, the company refused to budge and even Bill Gates, now known for his charity work and even demeanor, was famously uncooperative. The public saw Microsoft as evil; the court saw it as childish. Redmond has never entirely shrugged of its reputation as headquarters for “The Evil Empire” and “Micro$oft.”

At times, Google has been equally uncooperative. The company’s Wi-Fi snooping scandal was rife with maybe-we-did, maybe-we-didn’t, and it ultimately resulted in management laying blame on its engineers rather than owning up to the company’s mistakes. More recently, Google was caught circumventing Safari’s anti-tracking measures despite a public statement telling Safari users that their actions weren’t being logged – which lead to the previously aforementioned $22.5 million fine.

However, these trivial penalties are nothing compared to the damage done in the court of public opinion. Closures of major services, such as Reader and Picnik, are not bemoaned only because they take away a free product; the real problem is Google’s tendency to enter a market, destroy (or buy out) the competition, and then retreat – leaving only a crater behind. Actions like these spoil trust in Google, and, little by little, transform Google from a company that remembers its up-start roots into an entity that makes more excuses than apologies.

Domination leads to responsibility

This is exactly the opposite of how a company in a dominant position should act, and Google most certainly is a company in a dominant position. The company holds almost 70 percent of the market for online search and 79 percent of the market for online advertising. In addition, Google has the majority market share in online video and mobile advertising. Gmail is the world’s most popular webmail service, and Google Docs is likely the most popular online productivity suite, though hard numbers for that service are difficult to find.

Google doesn’t seem to understand that with great market share comes great responsibility

Google is already one of today’s biggest names in information, and its firm position in the Web’s most popular services provides the foundation to grow larger still. Though currently dominant, the company could turn itself into a true monopoly if the right moves are made. The death of services that are profitable are themselves an attempt by CEO Larry Page to solidify the company’s position and focus on strengths, a necessary move for any organization that wants to become not just a juggernaut but also the only viable option.

Still, focus doesn’t have to come at the expensive of public support. There were many ways to kill Reader. It could have been incorporated into the new Google Keep, updated on occasion by a small engineering staff, or simply abandoned without comment. Dropping the service completely shows Google doesn’t seem to understand that with great market share comes great responsibility.

Just as AT&T maintained unprofitable lines to maintain its commitment to universal service, Google must learn to maintain (if not further develop) services that are unprofitable but fill a public need. In fact, it should look for needs that are unfulfilled by any service and create products in response. If more engineers must be kept on-staff, so be it. Consider it the cost of public relations.

Conclusion

Google, like most companies that deal in information rather than physical products, must grow as large as possible. This is where it differs from Microsoft and Intel, both of which must worry about issues like manufacturing, supply, and customer service. Like the information giants that have preceded it, Google will become as large as possible as quickly as possible because there’s no reason not to.

However, vanquishing competitors doesn’t vanquish risk. Even a dominant company will slip if the public or government believes it to be acting against their interests. Though Google recently managed to dodge an FTC anti-trust investigation concerning self-promotion via search, an EU investigation is ongoing, and a lack of charges in either case doesn’t prevent a new investigation in the future. Google must be prepared to win in both a court of law and the court of public opinion. And that means a company’s motto of “do no evil” must be maintained, not just as a slogan but also as a guiding principle.

Image Credits: Todd Ehlers/Flickr, Kelly B/FlickrDolores Develde/Deviant Art, FHKE/Flickr.

Editors' Recommendations

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
Best refurbished laptop deals: How to find cheap used computers
microsoft surface laptop go 2020 on desk

Shopping the best laptop deals can land you some savings, but if it’s an incredibly low price you’re looking for, shopping refurbished is the way to go. Refurbished laptops offer a chance to save big, and you can often find some of yesterday’s best laptops at super cheap prices today. Most refurbished laptops are backed by warranties and reasonable return windows, so you can shop refurbished laptops with some confidence what you’re purchasing will hold up. There are a lot of great refurbished laptop deals out there right now, and they are laptops that make a lot of sense for students or anyone on a tight budget. Below you’ll find links to some of the best places to buy a refurbished laptop.
Best Buy refurbished laptops -- starting at $113
Best Buy's refurbished laptops are -- you guessed it -- Geek Squad Certified and while they may not be free and clear of absolutely all cosmetic scuffs they are still exceptionally clean and always in working order. Some of them even come with additional software like virus tools, streaming access, like Apple TV+, and much more. Of course, the best part is that you can get a premium and fully upgraded model for less, often with more storage, more power, and more features than you would when buying a base model brand new. You've got some great options from Lenovo, Acer, HP, Dell, Gateway, and even Apple to choose from. The cheapest models start around $120 and increase from there. The best way to know what's available is to head over and browse for yourself.

Dell Latitude -- starting at $279
Dell sometimes discounts laptops and machines, for varying reasons, including clearance deals of the week to make way for new stock. That's pretty much the case with Dell's Latitude models with the cheapest coming in around $189 up to $229 and above. There are a lot of different models, each with individual specifications and features, so you'll have to sift through the list, especially if you know what you're looking for already.

Read more
Best OLED monitor deals: Get an OLED screen from just $450
Marvel's Spider-Man running on the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8.

Shopping some of the best monitor deals is a good way to save on some extra screen real estate, but if you’re looking for something that can produce a stunning image you should turn your shopping cart toward the OLED monitors. OLED is one of the best picture technologies currently available, and it can create a lifelike image that makes interacting with games, presentations, and creative work much more immersive. The best OLED monitors can run pretty expensive, but that’s what OLED monitor deals are for. If you’re looking for superior picture quality and some ways to save, read onward for more details on the best OLED monitor deals taking place right now.
ViewSonic 15.6-inch VX1655 4K OLED portable monitor — $450, was $500

Getting into the OLED game can be both affordable and portable with the ViewSonic VX1655. It’s a 4K OLED display that’s made to function as either a laptop extension or something to pair with a tablet. It comes in at a super sharp 4K resolution and a refresh rate of 60Hz. This isn’t something you’d want to pair with a gaming PC, but it’s a great little display to keep with you if you do creative work on the run or want some extra screen real estate while working on a tablet at your desk.

Read more
Best monitor deals: Gaming, office, curved, OLED and more
Dell UltraSharp 27 4K PremierColor Monitor

Whether you prefer to work at one of the best desktop computers, the best laptops, or anything in between, an external monitor can be helpful to add some extra screen real estate. One of the best monitors can even go a long way toward reducing eye strain and creating an immersive digital or gaming experience. While high end monitors can get quite expensive, there are always some impressive monitor deals to shop, and we’ve tracked them all down. Reading onward you’ll find what we feel are the best monitor deals, whether you’re shopping for 4K monitors, gaming monitors, ultrawide monitors, or more general monitors meant for all-purpose users.
Best monitor deals

The following deals represent a best-of of the deals below. They're selected to give a mixture of prices, styles, and levels of discount. If you don't see something you like, don't worry, as the following sections will have plenty more deals for you to choose from. However, this is a highly recommended place to start:

Read more