Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Emerging Tech
  4. News

You can now choose how hard Claude thinks before answering your queries

For the first time, Claude users can decide whether their AI assistant thinks fast or thinks deep.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Page, Text, Business Card
Shikhar Mehrotra / Digital Trends

Anthropic just released Claude Opus 4.8, and while the benchmark improvements are quite real, the most meaningful change for everyday users is something far simpler. 

You can now tell Claude how hard to think before it responds to your query. Along with that, dynamic workflows are now available in research preview for Enterprise, Team, and Max plan users. 

Fast mode is available for Opus 4.8. It’s the same model at roughly 2.5x the speed, and we’ve made it three times cheaper than before.

Turn it on with /fast in Claude Code. On the API, contact your account manager to request access or join the waitlist: https://t.co/5SLFF77Whn

— Claude (@claudeai) May 28, 2026

What is effort control and why does it matter?

A new control sitting alongside the model selector on claude.ai page, where you interact with the AI model. It lets you choose the amount of effort Claude applies to any given query. 

Recommended Videos

There are five effort settings to choose from when using Opus 4.8: Low, Medium, High (Default), Extra, and Max. As the name suggests, low effort responses are faster, and therefore, better for quick or trivial questions, email drafts, or anything else that requires speed over depth. 

The High and Max settings, on the other hand, force Claude to think more deeply before responding. These effort levels are ideal for complex multi-step problems, detailed analysis or comparison, and anything where accuracy matters more than speed. However, as the AI model takes more time to respond, these effort levels exhaust your rate limits faster. 

The control is available on all plans. Until now, you only submitted a prompt, selected the AI model based on its known strengths, and Claude decided how much thinking to apply. Effort control effectively hands that decision to you. 

What else changed?

The most significant practical upgrade for developers is dynamic workflows. Claude Code can now plan a large task, spin up hundreds of parallel subagents in a single session, and verify its own outputs before reporting back. 

The Messages API now accepts system entries inside the messages array, allowing developers to update Claude’s instructions mid-task without breaking the prompt cache. This is especially useful for updating permissions, token budgets, or environment context. 

Anthropic also mentions that Opus 4.8 is around four times less likely than its predecessor to let flaws in code pass without noticing. The release arrives 41 days after Opus 4.7, reflecting an accelerating update frequency. 

Shikhar Mehrotra
For more than five years, Shikhar has consistently simplified developments in the field of consumer tech and presented them…
Google’s new Magic Pointer Play Store listing reveals a Gemini shortcut built for Googlebooks
The unannounced app turns the cursor into a contextual AI tool for search, image creation, and shopping
Plant, Text, Business Card

Google has quietly published a new Play Store listing for Magic Pointer, an unannounced app built for Googlebooks. Updated on July 10, the app turns the cursor into a Gemini shortcut that can act on whatever a user selects on screen.

Magic Pointer can send an image to Lens, generate a related image, or surface a shopping action without forcing users to open a separate chatbot. Regular Android devices currently show as incompatible, so the listing offers an early preview rather than a broad release.

Read more
You can stop using AI, but this new report says you probably can’t escape it
A UK survey found that most people feel AI exposure is unavoidable, raising harder questions about consent, privacy, and whether opting out is still realistic
AI Chatbots

More people are trying to use less AI, but avoiding it altogether may already be impossible.

A survey of 2,055 UK adults found that 42% deliberately limit how much AI they use. Another 70% said avoiding AI exposure would be difficult or impossible, even when they actively wanted less of it.

Read more
The face on an AI interviewer may matter as much as the decision it makes
Researchers found that race and gender matching changed how fairly rejected applicants viewed an automated interview, even though everyone received the same outcome
File, Computer Hardware, Electronics

An AI hiring system can treat every applicant the same and still leave some people feeling targeted. Researchers found that rejected candidates judged an automated interview differently depending on the race and gender of the avatar delivering the result.

Around 220 participants completed a simulated interview for a fictional customer support role with one of four photorealistic AI avatars. Everyone was rejected, yet perceptions of fairness shifted with the interviewer’s appearance. An algorithm audit could miss that reaction because candidates don’t experience the system as raw code. They experience a face asking questions and judging their answers.

Read more