Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Your ChatGPT conversations could get spicy but not graphic

OpenAI clarifies its adult mode will allow erotic text but block explicit images, voice and video.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Logo, Symbol, Blackboard
Alexander Sinn / Unsplash

If you’ve been wondering when ChatGPT might start handling spicier conversations, OpenAI has some clarity for you. According to the Wall Street Journal, the company plans to let adults generate erotic text exchanges while keeping a firm ban on explicit images, voice clones or video content. A spokesperson described the planned feature as smut rather than pornography, signaling a careful attempt to offer racier interactions without turning the chatbot into a full-blown adult entertainment platform.

The rollout has hit delays though. OpenAI recently pushed back adult mode, originally scheduled for the first quarter, citing technical hurdles and internal debates over safety. A major sticking point involves keeping minors out. The company’s new age-prediction system was misclassifying about 12 percent of under-18 users as adults, a flaw that could have let millions of young users access erotic chats.

The tricky art of drawing lines

OpenAI has been figuring out these boundaries for years, well before ChatGPT existed. Back in 2021, executives noticed that AI Dungeon, a text-based adventure game running on OpenAI’s platform, sometimes pushed users into violent sexual scenarios without any prompting. Other times the AI would escalate tame exchanges into much more intense sexual conversations.

Recommended Videos

Those early incidents exposed a messy reality. The company’s content moderation tools were blunt instruments, unable to reliably separate mainstream erotica from material involving nonconsensual acts or child exploitation.

The current approach tries to thread that needle by allowing text-only adult conversations while maintaining a hard ban on generating explicit images, video or voice.

Why OpenAI feels pressured to offer adult chats

The company’s push into adult conversations comes at a challenging moment. OpenAI’s technological advantage over rivals like xAI and Anthropic has narrowed, and it faces mounting financial losses while competing for users and funding. Sam Altman has suggested that explicit content would likely boost growth and generate extra revenue, a tempting prospect given the pressure.

The CEO has expressed conflicted feelings publicly though. On a podcast last August, Altman was asked if he had made any decisions that were best for the world but not best for winning. He acknowledged that erotica would drive growth but said it wouldn’t align with the company’s long-term goal of serving users well.

Two months later Altman appeared to reverse course. He posted on X that OpenAI had addressed serious mental health concerns related to chatbots and had new content tools, announcing plans to launch adult mode in December.

We made ChatGPT pretty restrictive to make sure we were being careful with mental health issues. We realize this made it less useful/enjoyable to many users who had no mental health problems, but given the seriousness of the issue we wanted to get this right.

Now that we have…

— Sam Altman (@sama) October 14, 2025

What happens next with adult mode

OpenAI has made it clear adult mode is coming eventually, despite the delay. The company has hired mental health experts and built a youth well-being team to monitor long-term effects once adult mode launches. It also trains its models not to encourage exclusive relationships with users and to remind them they need real-world connections.

For now users curious about adult ChatGPT conversations will have to wait. The company is prioritizing other features like personality adjustments and personalization while it works through the remaining hurdles.

Paulo Vargas
Paulo Vargas is an English major turned reporter turned technical writer, with a career that has always circled back to…
Google’s new Magic Pointer Play Store listing reveals a Gemini shortcut built for Googlebooks
The unannounced app turns the cursor into a contextual AI tool for search, image creation, and shopping
Plant, Text, Business Card

Google has quietly published a new Play Store listing for Magic Pointer, an unannounced app built for Googlebooks. Updated on July 10, the app turns the cursor into a Gemini shortcut that can act on whatever a user selects on screen.

Magic Pointer can send an image to Lens, generate a related image, or surface a shopping action without forcing users to open a separate chatbot. Regular Android devices currently show as incompatible, so the listing offers an early preview rather than a broad release.

Read more
You can stop using AI, but this new report says you probably can’t escape it
A UK survey found that most people feel AI exposure is unavoidable, raising harder questions about consent, privacy, and whether opting out is still realistic
AI Chatbots

More people are trying to use less AI, but avoiding it altogether may already be impossible.

A survey of 2,055 UK adults found that 42% deliberately limit how much AI they use. Another 70% said avoiding AI exposure would be difficult or impossible, even when they actively wanted less of it.

Read more
The face on an AI interviewer may matter as much as the decision it makes
Researchers found that race and gender matching changed how fairly rejected applicants viewed an automated interview, even though everyone received the same outcome
File, Computer Hardware, Electronics

An AI hiring system can treat every applicant the same and still leave some people feeling targeted. Researchers found that rejected candidates judged an automated interview differently depending on the race and gender of the avatar delivering the result.

Around 220 participants completed a simulated interview for a fictional customer support role with one of four photorealistic AI avatars. Everyone was rejected, yet perceptions of fairness shifted with the interviewer’s appearance. An algorithm audit could miss that reaction because candidates don’t experience the system as raw code. They experience a face asking questions and judging their answers.

Read more