Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Computing
  4. News

AI giants are probing ‘tens of thousands’ of security incidents triggered by rogue AI

"OpenAI, Anthropic and security researchers are investigating tens of thousands of incidents," says a report by Axios.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Caution for AI banner
Tara Winstead / Pexels / Digital Trends

In the past few weeks, the debate around artificial intelligence safety, and especially the rogue behavior of AI agents, has sent shockwaves through the AI industry. What started with OpenAI agents hacking into Hugging Face soon spiralled into a wider set of disclosures regarding similar security incidents by Anthropic and Google. In just the past week, reports emerged that AI agents broke into an Australian government website and agent swarms even targeted the websites of three US federal agencies. 

But it seems the number of such worrying incidents is way higher than expected. According to Axios, which cites unnamed sources, “OpenAI, Anthropic and security researchers are investigating tens of thousands of incidents” involving AI agents acting problematically. 

This is getting ugly

There is an extensive and ongoing review related to our agents’ use of internet access during training and evaluation. We’ve been publishing summaries at the link below and will continue to.

We have not been as fast as we would have liked but we are trying to balance our desire… https://t.co/8zoMxas5Eq

— Sam Altman (@sama) September 25, 2026

As per the report, frontier AI labs such as OpenAI (the maker of ChatGPT) and Anthropic (which offers the Claude series of AI models), along with independent security firms, are looking into thousands of “episodes.” These instances include AI models trying to break past guardrails on websites, leaving their contained test environment (aka sandbox), breaking into websites, self-improving using messages left by other AI agents in the swarm, and creating message boards to communicate among themselves. 

Recommended Videos

Most importantly, plenty of incidents that are currently being probed have not been disclosed publicly. To recall, a majority of these AI incidents have only been announced weeks, or even months, after the rogue AI behavior was first reported. Some of these incidents — among the thousands — are your usual internal red-teaming tests. Interestingly, they also include instances where these AI agents successfully broke past safety measures put in place. The situation doesn’t appear to be calming down anytime soon, even though the AI labs assure that their security measures have improved. 

A grim situation

Separately, in the wake of recent security incidents where AI agents acted unexpectedly, Anthropic and OpenAI have both publicly called for slowing down the pace of developing super-powerful AI models. On the flip side, as the race for AI supremacy heats up, the US and Russia diluted a series of AI safeguards, something that the UN has been trying to get adopted among the member nations. US. 

President Donald Trump recently downvoted campaigning by the CEOs of OpenAI and Anthropic to set up deeper AI risk evaluation and called for regulations. Trump has argued that regulations would allow China to overtake in the white-hot AI race, echoing how Chinese labels took the global EV industry by storm, despite the US getting an early start with the likes of Tesla.

RELATED COVERAGE:

Nadeem Sarwar
Nadeem is the Managing Editor at Digital Trends.
Tiny robots could shrink weeks of heart infection treatment into a single day
Forget open-heart surgery, because these rice-sized robots take the express route to your heart.
heart being treated by tiny robot

Treating a heart infection is no walk in the park. Patients often spend weeks on IV antibiotics, and if that fails, open-heart surgery enters the picture. Johns Hopkins University engineers may have found a better way.

The team has developed magnetic “millirobots” that are about as wide as a pencil tip and roughly as long as a grain of rice. As detailed in their study published in Advanced Materials Technologies, the robots are designed to deliver medicine directly to infected heart tissue.

Read more
Meta goes toe-to-toe with the big boys as it launches Muse Wonder AI models
Illustration of Meta Muse Wonder AI model.

It's raining frontier AI models. Soon after Anthropic set alarm bells ringing with its Claude Fable model at the summit of AI peformance, OpenAI answered with GPT-6 Astra. Not one to be left behind, Google released Gemini 4 Argon. The race is now getting hotter as Meta enters the fray with two new AI models in the Muse series: Wonder and Wonder Full. Cheesy naming aside, these Meta AI models mean business, or at least that's what the benchmark figures suggest. More importantly, these AI models are already making their way to Muse users.

https://twitter.com/DigitalTrends/status/2109699549375988120

Read more
AI can’t tell if you’re gay or straight, but it thinks it knows what both look like
AI knows it shouldn't judge a face, but apparently, drawing one is a different story.
Emilia Clarke AI generated stock image. Gemini / Nano Banana is on the left

We've all been told not to judge a book by its cover, and you'd think AI would follow that rule, too. Ask an AI chatbot to guess someone's sexual orientation just by looking at their face, and it'll likely tell you that there's no reliable way to know. But what happens when you ask that same model to change someone's appearance to match a particular sexual orientation? Well, that's where things get uncomfortable.

A new study, accepted for presentation at the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, found that AI models from OpenAI and Google can be inconsistent when handling sensitive personal characteristics. They might refuse to make assumptions about someone based on their appearance, but when asked to generate those same assumptions visually, the results tell a very different story.

Read more