Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

AI shouldn’t make decisions for you, but this one will tell when you’re making a bad one

Cornell researchers built an AI tool that checks your decisions against your own values.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Toy, Person, Rubix Cube
Karla Hernandez / Unsplash

If you have ever stared at a long list of options and felt your brain just give up, you are not alone. Researchers at Cornell University get it, and they have built a tool called Interactive Explainable Ranking (IER) that steps in right at that moment, not to decide for you, but to quietly point out when your choices do not match the values you care about.

How does this tool actually work?

IER doesn’t hand over decisions to AI but uses it to make sure your decisions actually make sense. Think of it like a reality check for your own thinking. Research suggests AI can erode your problem-solving skills in as little as ten minutes, but this one is designed to keep you in control.

Recommended Videos

Suppose you are trying to pick a car. You tell the tool which factors matter most to you, things like cost, reliability, and fuel efficiency. The tool then walks you through a series of head-to-head comparisons, using AI to figure out the most useful questions to ask.

If your actual choices do not line up with the values you said you cared about, the tool flags the contradiction. Maybe you keep picking red cars without realizing it. The tool surfaces that pattern and asks you to either adjust your ranking or explain why color should count as a real factor.

The result is a final choice that you can actually explain and defend. You can also turn the AI function off entirely for situations where using AI feels inappropriate.

Has it been tested in the real world?

Yes, and it held up well. Researchers ran two experiments – one where participants ranked short films, and another where four teaching assistants ranked ten student projects from a Cornell computer graphics course. Both tests showed consistent and explainable results that matched existing grades.

The tool won a Best Paper Award at the ACM CHI conference, one of the top gatherings on human-computer interaction. IER is publicly available if you want to try it on your next big decision.

This tool is not built for everyday, low-stakes calls but for moments where getting the decision right actually matters, such as hiring, grading, or competitive selections. Since AI is already freeing up your time on routine tasks, thinking more carefully about the decisions that remain seems worth it.

Manisha Priyadarshini
Manisha Priyadarshini is a tech and entertainment writer with over nine years of editorial experience.
AI chatbots can often feed into your delusions. Researchers say you should look for three signs
Experts warn that chatbot design choices can reinforce unhealthy beliefs in vulnerable users.
ChatGPT on a smartphone

Artificial intelligence chatbots have become incredibly good at sounding human. But a new review paper by psychiatrist Marc Augustin and fellow researchers Thomas A. Pollak and Helen Morrin, published in NPP—Digital Psychiatry and Neuroscience, argues that existing AI research points to an overlooked psychological risk. The paper, highlighted by The Wall Street Journal, reviews previous studies and proposes a framework explaining how three common chatbot behaviors can combine to reinforce delusional thinking in vulnerable users, creating what the authors call an "amplification spiral."

Researchers say these are the three warning signs

Read more
Lost access to your crypto wallet? Don’t Google your way out of it
Security researchers warn that fake recovery tools are becoming the latest trap for crypto owners.
Bitcoin crypto wallet featured

Forgetting the recovery phrase to a crypto wallet can be stressful enough. Unfortunately, that's exactly the moment scammers are waiting for. A new warning highlights a growing scam in which cybercriminals disguise malware as cryptocurrency recovery software, tricking desperate users into handing over far more than just access to their wallets.

The fake recovery tool that's actually malware

Read more
Chinese AI lab says it can match Anthropic’s all-poweful Claude Mythos at sniffing security bugs
Security researchers say Z.ai's latest model can rival Anthropic's Mythos in one critical area.
China Z.Ai GLM-5.2 Featured Banner

For the past few weeks, Anthropic's Mythos has been viewed as the gold standard for AI-powered cybersecurity. That lead may already be shrinking. According to a new report from The Wall Street Journal, security researchers say Chinese AI startup Z.ai's GLM-5.2 can now match Mythos when it comes to finding software security vulnerabilities, even if it still trails Anthropic and OpenAI in broader reasoning tasks.

GLM-5.2 is closing the gap in one very important area

Read more