Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

AI shouldn’t make decisions for you, but this one will tell when you’re making a bad one

Cornell researchers built an AI tool that checks your decisions against your own values.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Toy, Person, Rubix Cube
Karla Hernandez / Unsplash

If you have ever stared at a long list of options and felt your brain just give up, you are not alone. Researchers at Cornell University get it, and they have built a tool called Interactive Explainable Ranking (IER) that steps in right at that moment, not to decide for you, but to quietly point out when your choices do not match the values you care about.

How does this tool actually work?

IER doesn’t hand over decisions to AI but uses it to make sure your decisions actually make sense. Think of it like a reality check for your own thinking. Research suggests AI can erode your problem-solving skills in as little as ten minutes, but this one is designed to keep you in control.

Recommended Videos

Suppose you are trying to pick a car. You tell the tool which factors matter most to you, things like cost, reliability, and fuel efficiency. The tool then walks you through a series of head-to-head comparisons, using AI to figure out the most useful questions to ask.

If your actual choices do not line up with the values you said you cared about, the tool flags the contradiction. Maybe you keep picking red cars without realizing it. The tool surfaces that pattern and asks you to either adjust your ranking or explain why color should count as a real factor.

The result is a final choice that you can actually explain and defend. You can also turn the AI function off entirely for situations where using AI feels inappropriate.

Has it been tested in the real world?

Yes, and it held up well. Researchers ran two experiments – one where participants ranked short films, and another where four teaching assistants ranked ten student projects from a Cornell computer graphics course. Both tests showed consistent and explainable results that matched existing grades.

The tool won a Best Paper Award at the ACM CHI conference, one of the top gatherings on human-computer interaction. IER is publicly available if you want to try it on your next big decision.

This tool is not built for everyday, low-stakes calls but for moments where getting the decision right actually matters, such as hiring, grading, or competitive selections. Since AI is already freeing up your time on routine tasks, thinking more carefully about the decisions that remain seems worth it.

Manisha Priyadarshini
Manisha Priyadarshini is a tech and entertainment writer with over nine years of editorial experience.
Yet another study says AI is bad for elections, and the rabbit hole gets worse
AI may be an election bomb waiting for someone to light the fuse
Voters cast their ballots on Election Day

Another election, another study has concluded that asking an AI chatbot for political guidance is a spectacularly bad idea. Research conducted during Hungary’s 2026 parliamentary election found that ChatGPT and Google Gemini offered not just inaccurate but also inconsistent and unreliable voting advice. The chatbots misclassified voter profiles, overlooked relevant parties, recommended parties absent from the ballot, and sometimes produced materially different answers when given the same information repeatedly.

AI keeps failing the voter test

Read more
Samsung’s humanoid robot ambitions are real, but factories come first
Samsung’s new robotics division has humanoids in its sights, although its immediate business is far more practical factory automation
Robot Touch Human Finger

Samsung wants a place in the humanoid race, but its new robotics push begins with machines built for factories rather than homes.

The CEO-led RX robotics division will initially focus on manufacturing robots. Samsung has separately identified humanoids as a priority, although it hasn’t announced a commercial model or explained where one fits into the division’s immediate plans.

Read more
The future of AI may depend on this one behind-the-scenes change
Running Claude on Android.

Whenever a new AI model arrives, it's easy to get caught up in the bells and whistles. We talk about how much smarter it is, how quickly it answers questions, or how realistic its images have become. But here's the thing: none of that matters much if the AI can't reliably work with the apps and services people use every day.

That's why an upcoming update to the Model Context Protocol (MCP) caught my attention. It isn't a new chatbot or a fancy AI model. In fact, most people will never even know it's happening. But it could quietly make the AI ecosystem a lot healthier. If you've never heard of MCP before, don't worry. Think of it as a shared language that lets AI assistants safely talk to apps like Gmail, Slack, calendars, databases, and countless other services. Instead of every company inventing its own way to make those connections, MCP gives everyone a common rulebook.

Read more