Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

AI shouldn’t make decisions for you, but this one will tell when you’re making a bad one

Cornell researchers built an AI tool that checks your decisions against your own values.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Toy, Person, Rubix Cube
Karla Hernandez / Unsplash

If you have ever stared at a long list of options and felt your brain just give up, you are not alone. Researchers at Cornell University get it, and they have built a tool called Interactive Explainable Ranking (IER) that steps in right at that moment, not to decide for you, but to quietly point out when your choices do not match the values you care about.

How does this tool actually work?

IER doesn’t hand over decisions to AI but uses it to make sure your decisions actually make sense. Think of it like a reality check for your own thinking. Research suggests AI can erode your problem-solving skills in as little as ten minutes, but this one is designed to keep you in control.

Recommended Videos

Suppose you are trying to pick a car. You tell the tool which factors matter most to you, things like cost, reliability, and fuel efficiency. The tool then walks you through a series of head-to-head comparisons, using AI to figure out the most useful questions to ask.

If your actual choices do not line up with the values you said you cared about, the tool flags the contradiction. Maybe you keep picking red cars without realizing it. The tool surfaces that pattern and asks you to either adjust your ranking or explain why color should count as a real factor.

The result is a final choice that you can actually explain and defend. You can also turn the AI function off entirely for situations where using AI feels inappropriate.

Has it been tested in the real world?

Yes, and it held up well. Researchers ran two experiments – one where participants ranked short films, and another where four teaching assistants ranked ten student projects from a Cornell computer graphics course. Both tests showed consistent and explainable results that matched existing grades.

The tool won a Best Paper Award at the ACM CHI conference, one of the top gatherings on human-computer interaction. IER is publicly available if you want to try it on your next big decision.

This tool is not built for everyday, low-stakes calls but for moments where getting the decision right actually matters, such as hiring, grading, or competitive selections. Since AI is already freeing up your time on routine tasks, thinking more carefully about the decisions that remain seems worth it.

Manisha Priyadarshini
Manisha Priyadarshini is a tech and entertainment writer with over nine years of editorial experience.
Xreal’s latest AR glasses fix the brightness problem, but leave the rest largely untouched
Accessories, Sunglasses, Glasses

AR glasses sound magical until I imagine wearing them somewhere bright. That’s why a new pair launched today caught my eye.

Xreal's 1 Pro Plus refreshes its One Pro glasses (which float a virtual screen in front of your eyes). It packs a much brighter display than the outgoing model and smoother 2D-to-3D conversion. You can buy it now for $599.

Read more
A $75 gadget that remembers my conversations? Bee has my attention and my reservations
Two new ways to let AI listen (and remember) what you said.
Electronics, Phone, Mobile Phone

A $75 gadget that remembers my conversations? I’m intrigued and, at the same time, slightly nervous.

Amazon-owned Bee has launched two conversation-summarizing devices: the Bee Frontier ($74.99), available now, and the Bee Eclipse ($99.99), a magnetic phone card arriving soon. There’s also a new subscription: Bee Pro. 

Read more
Anthropic warns of imminent self-replicating AI that might even work off an oven or TV
Self-replicating AI could be merely months away, and tests show it can run on the devices sitting at your home.
Illustration of dangerous AI.

Over the past few weeks, nearly every AI lab has released frontier AI models. Earlier today, Google started rolling out Gemini 4, Argon, hot on the heels of Meta announcing its Muse Wonder frontier AI models to compete against the best from OpenAI and Anthropic's Claude. This relentless pace of AI model release comes at a time when the same AI labs are calling for development slowdown and increased regulation, following a series of concerning incidents where these AI models went rogue and broke into private, as well as government-owned, websites.

Now, Anthropic has dropped a chilling set of predictions about the capabilities of these AI models after running a series of tests. The company claims that small AI models could be merely a few months away from self-replicating and turning into a dangerous swarm. More importantly, they won't require a massive data center or an uber-powerful computer to do so. On the contrary, the lab claims that these self-replicating AI swarms will need something with as little computing power as an average Internet-connected device, like a smart oven or an Android TV box.

Read more