Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Anthropic’s CEO wants to slow down the AI race, but it’s apparently eyeing another superpowerful AI model release

The company is facing a rather awkward balancing act between AI safety and staying competitive.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Anthropic Featured Logo
Anthropic

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei wants the AI industry to slow down, but his own company may be preparing to step on the accelerator again. According to Reuters, Anthropic is considering releasing a new AI model to counter growing momentum from OpenAI, just days after Amodei called for the industry to deliberately moderate the pace of AI development.

Anthropic has a rather large competitor-shaped problem

All this makes for a rather awkward situation. Amodei recently argued that AI capabilities are advancing so quickly that safety measures need more time to catch up. In his September 12 essay, he wrote, “We must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models.” He proposed measures including permanent access for independent third-party evaluators, coordinated safety standards, and international cooperation.

The reason Anthropic may still be considering another model is fairly straightforward: OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra is gaining traction with businesses, putting pressure on Anthropic’s position in the enterprise AI market. Reuters reports that three sources familiar with the matter say Anthropic is weighing a new release, although the company has not publicly confirmed that it is preparing one.

That competitive pressure matters even more with Anthropic preparing for a potential IPO. Investors are reportedly reassessing the company’s position as OpenAI gains enterprise momentum, creating an uncomfortable choice: slow down development for safety, or keep pace with rivals that aren’t necessarily hitting the brakes.

The AI race isn’t exactly built for taking a breather

Amodei’s concerns have received support from other major AI figures. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk backed calls for a more deliberate pace, while Google DeepMind’s Demis Hassabis has also acknowledged the need for greater coordination around AI safety.

Dario is right https://t.co/EwKgqQGaUo

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 12, 2026

But the competitive reality remains stubborn. If one company slows down while another keeps releasing increasingly capable models, the incentive to keep pushing becomes difficult to ignore. Anthropic’s reported dilemma therefore captures the bigger problem facing the entire industry: everyone may agree that the AI race needs a speed limit, but nobody seems particularly keen on being the first to take their foot off the accelerator.

RELATED COVERAGE:

Varun Mirchandani
Varun is an experienced technology journalist and editor with over eight years in consumer tech media. His work spans…
AI can’t tell if you’re gay or straight, but it thinks it knows what both look like
AI knows it shouldn't judge a face, but apparently, drawing one is a different story.
Emilia Clarke AI generated stock image. Gemini / Nano Banana is on the left

We've all been told not to judge a book by its cover, and you'd think AI would follow that rule, too. Ask an AI chatbot to guess someone's sexual orientation just by looking at their face, and it'll likely tell you that there's no reliable way to know. But what happens when you ask that same model to change someone's appearance to match a particular sexual orientation? Well, that's where things get uncomfortable.

A new study, accepted for presentation at the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, found that AI models from OpenAI and Google can be inconsistent when handling sensitive personal characteristics. They might refuse to make assumptions about someone based on their appearance, but when asked to generate those same assumptions visually, the results tell a very different story.

Read more
A clinical study with Google’s special chatbot shows a strong future for AI in healthcare
Google’s medical AI could give doctors a useful second set of eyes
Google Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer chatbot

AI is a useful tool for handling many tasks in private as well as professional settings, but medical advice, especially diagnosis, is one area where I generally draw the line. General-purpose chatbots tend to sound confident and convincing while giving medical advice, even when they are wrong, as studies have previously found.

That being said, Google's new research points to a much more convincing use for AI in healthcare. Its Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer chatbot, or AMIE for short, could help prepare both sides before the appointment even begins.

Read more
Relaxation music had one job in this pain study, and favorite songs did it better
Patients who chose their music reported less pain after an IV insertion
Book, Publication, Indoors

Patients’ favorite songs helped ease pain after an IV insertion in a new study, while music specifically chosen for relaxation didn’t show a significant benefit. The soothing soundtrack could apparently use a second opinion.

Researchers at University Hospital Zürich studied 204 patients receiving an IV cannula before an MRI scan. Those listening to their chosen music reported less pain 30 seconds and two minutes after insertion. Across the full sample, the clearest relief came after the needle went in.

Read more