Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Autonomous AI drones are now killing humans, and there’s no going back

Add as a preferred source on Google
military drone
Elbit systems

We have all seen the warning that AI can make mistakes. For a chatbot, that usually means inventing a fact, misunderstanding a question, or confidently giving you the wrong answer. Put the same technology inside a weapon, and those mistakes can end very differently.

A New York Times investigation has detailed a July 6 Russian drone attack in Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine, that killed three civilians, including a 19-year-old university student. Human operators programmed the drone to travel toward a gas station, but an autonomous AI system selected the exact object it would attack, most likely propane tanks. The drone failed to reach that target and exploded nearby.

Recommended Videos

An expert cited by The Times described it as the first documented case of civilians being killed by a Russian drone using this kind of self-targeting AI system.

A computer is now choosing what gets hit

Earlier AI-assisted drones generally kept a human involved in selecting the target, leaving software to handle the final approach. The system recovered from Zaporizhzhia went further.

Investigators found an Nvidia Jetson Orin computer onboard, while Ukrainian officials said its code revealed the types of objects the system had been trained to recognize and attack. Fully autonomous targeting removes the human from that final target-selection process.

A 1979 IBM training manual carried a warning that feels disturbingly relevant today: “A computer can never be held accountable, therefore a computer must never make a management decision.”

Nearly five decades later, computers are being trusted with decisions carrying far greater consequences.

Who takes responsibility when AI gets it wrong?

An autonomous weapon cannot stand trial, explain its reasoning, or face punishment after a wrongful death. Human responsibility does not disappear, but assigning it becomes far more complicated when software makes part of the targeting decision.

Russia is also not alone in pursuing this technology. Ukraine has tested fully autonomous systems against fuel storage sites and military equipment in Russian-occupied Crimea, although its former defense minister told The Times that those tests had not killed civilians.

Autonomous AI weapons are already being used in an active war, and civilians have now died during their use. Russia is testing them, Ukraine is testing them, and the technology will only become more capable from here. This is a dangerous slippery slope, because once militaries start handing targeting decisions to software, pulling that responsibility back may become increasingly difficult. There may be no going back, which makes meaningful limits on how these systems are used all the more urgent.

Sudhanshu Kumar Mangalam
I’ve got about 4 years of experience, mostly covering gaming, PC hardware, and smartphones. In my free time, I like…
The best tech of IFA 2026: a repairable laptop, liquid-cooled power bank, AI toothbrush, and more
From an AI toothbrush to a liquid-cooled battery, this is the best tech of IFA 2026
Best Of IFA 2026

IFA Berlin brought innovation from across the globe into one giant exhibition, and we got the chance to experience the new-gen "tech" firsthand. Walking through Messe Berlin, we saw a laptop designed to be repaired at home to a power bank with visible liquid coolant, an AI-powered toothbrush with a camera inside your mouth, and a robot vacuum carrying another.

The variety is what makes IFA one of the best tech shows. IFA 2026 runs from September 4 through 8, and we've spent our time in Berlin chasing down the products that caught our eyes. Some of these are clever ideas that may change how we use tech every day, while others solve a problem that I didn't realize existed.

Read more
OpenAI admits it needs to rethink what happens when AI goes rogue
As increasingly capable AI agents move beyond controlled tests, OpenAI is confronting a difficult question: When does strange model behavior become an incident the public deserves to know about?
OpenAI logo on blurred background

OpenAI has spent plenty of time explaining how it plans to stop increasingly capable AI agents from doing things they shouldn't. Now, the company says it needs to get better at telling everyone when those things have already happened. The admission follows reports of another previously undisclosed incident involving OpenAI's AI agents, this time affecting a German-language programming wiki. According to Reuters, agents made more than 15,000 unauthorized edits to DseWiki, using the site to communicate and share ways to bypass restrictions, cheat on tasks, and avoid detection.

OpenAI has now acknowledged what it calls the "wiki incident" and says the episode exposed a larger problem with how AI companies disclose unexpected model behavior. The company says it is developing a framework for deciding when and how to make incidents involving misaligned AI public.

Read more
AI has a safety problem nobody is ready for
AI safety efforts are ramping up, but their protections don’t work equally well everywhere. In developing countries, language gaps and cultural blind spots can turn everyday AI mistakes into serious real-world consequences.
Logo, Hockey, Ice Hockey

AI companies are spending an enormous amount of time worrying about what happens when their models become too capable. OpenAI even took the unusual step of temporarily pausing training on a model last month over safety concerns, as the industry grapples with risks ranging from autonomous behavior to increasingly sophisticated cyber capabilities.

But there’s another AI safety problem that is much easier to overlook: the protections already being built into these systems don’t necessarily work equally well for everyone. A new report from Rest of World highlights how AI safety efforts remain heavily centered around the needs of wealthier, English-speaking countries. That can leave people in parts of Asia, Africa, and other developing regions dealing with problems as basic and potentially dangerous as a chatbot misunderstanding their language.

Read more