Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

ChatGPT’s $200 Pro plan is returning with a change you’ll want to know about

ChatGPT’s most expensive Pro subscription is reopening to new users, and OpenAI says a new approach to usage should make the plan more sustainable — without bringing back one particularly annoying restriction.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone
Shimul Sood / Digital Trends

ChatGPT’s $200-per-month Pro subscription is getting ready to reopen to new users, but there’s a catch. When it comes back, the way your usage is calculated will look a little different. Thibault “Tibo” Sottiaux, who leads core products including ChatGPT and Codex, explained the change in a post on X. Under the new system, the $200 Pro plan will effectively come with around half the API-equivalent spend it offered before. Now, that sounds like you’re getting half as much for the same $200, but it’s not quite that straightforward.

API prices for GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna were recently cut by 50%. So, those models now eat up less of your allowance, so you should still be able to get roughly the same amount of actual work done. And as the models get cheaper and more efficient, that $200 could stretch even further. There’s another bit of good news for heavy users, too: the five-hour usage window isn’t coming back.

The idea is to make your $200 go further

That means you won’t have to plan your work around a five-hour window anymore. Instead, Pro subscribers can use their weekly allowance whenever they need it. Sottiaux says the goal is for subscribers to gradually get more work done for the same money as models improve and become cheaper to run. And that’s where the API pricing comes into the picture.

Hi,

Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.

Now that…

— Tibo (@thsottiaux) September 29, 2026

Rather than keeping API prices unnecessarily high just to make the Pro subscription look like a better deal, the company plans to keep lowering them as running these models becomes cheaper. We’re already seeing that happen — GPT-6 Sol and Luna both cost 50% less through the API than their GPT-5.6 counterparts. If that trend continues, your weekly allowance could become more useful over time even if the dollar value attached to it doesn’t increase. Eventually, Sottiaux expects those prices to fall far enough that paying for the AI usage you need could make sense for more people, leaving much less of a difference between what your money gets you through a subscription and through the API.

And there’s apparently much more coming

The timing of this change is interesting because it sounds like the Pro subscription is about to get a few other upgrades as well. Sottiaux said he wanted to explain the new usage system before “all the big announcements tomorrow,” teasing several additions that should make the subscriptions more compelling. He didn’t reveal what those additions will be, but he did offer one interesting hint: some of the new perks won’t revolve around giving subscribers more AI usage.

So yes, seeing the API-equivalent value of a $200 subscription effectively cut in half sounds pretty rough. But cheaper models change that equation. If the same allowance can get more done as prices fall, the practical difference may end up being much smaller than the numbers initially suggest. And with more subscription news apparently coming tomorrow, we shouldn’t have to wait long to find out what else that $200 will get you.

Shimul Sood
Shimul is a contributor at Digital Trends, with over five years of experience in the tech space.
AI can’t tell if you’re gay or straight, but it thinks it knows what both look like
AI knows it shouldn't judge a face, but apparently, drawing one is a different story.
Emilia Clarke AI generated stock image. Gemini / Nano Banana is on the left

We've all been told not to judge a book by its cover, and you'd think AI would follow that rule, too. Ask an AI chatbot to guess someone's sexual orientation just by looking at their face, and it'll likely tell you that there's no reliable way to know. But what happens when you ask that same model to change someone's appearance to match a particular sexual orientation? Well, that's where things get uncomfortable.

A new study, accepted for presentation at the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, found that AI models from OpenAI and Google can be inconsistent when handling sensitive personal characteristics. They might refuse to make assumptions about someone based on their appearance, but when asked to generate those same assumptions visually, the results tell a very different story.

Read more
A clinical study with Google’s special chatbot shows a strong future for AI in healthcare
Google’s medical AI could give doctors a useful second set of eyes
Google Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer chatbot

AI is a useful tool for handling many tasks in private as well as professional settings, but medical advice, especially diagnosis, is one area where I generally draw the line. General-purpose chatbots tend to sound confident and convincing while giving medical advice, even when they are wrong, as studies have previously found.

That being said, Google's new research points to a much more convincing use for AI in healthcare. Its Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer chatbot, or AMIE for short, could help prepare both sides before the appointment even begins.

Read more
Relaxation music had one job in this pain study, and favorite songs did it better
Patients who chose their music reported less pain after an IV insertion
Book, Publication, Indoors

Patients’ favorite songs helped ease pain after an IV insertion in a new study, while music specifically chosen for relaxation didn’t show a significant benefit. The soothing soundtrack could apparently use a second opinion.

Researchers at University Hospital Zürich studied 204 patients receiving an IV cannula before an MRI scan. Those listening to their chosen music reported less pain 30 seconds and two minutes after insertion. Across the full sample, the clearest relief came after the needle went in.

Read more