Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Geckobot: Our first take

This Geckobot will have your kids climbing the walls

The market for educational kids toys is booming, and we’re seeing more and more robotics kits designed to spark interest in STEM subjects — that’s science, tech, engineering, and math, of course. The Geckobot fits neatly into this trend. The box contains 176 plastic pieces to snap and prod together. It’s aimed at children aged 8 years and up. Experienced science kit manufacturer Thames & Kosmos suggests that the Geckobot is a good way for your kids to learn about air pressure and suction.

If you manage to build it correctly, you’ll have a motorized gecko with suction cups for feet, capable of climbing windows and other smooth surfaces. Sadly, it’s not the easiest thing to put together, and the result when you do is distinctly underwhelming.

Recommended Videos

Our Geckobot definitely sucked, but not in the way it was meant to.

Getting started with the Gecko

Pop open the box and you’ll find a few plastic packets filled with pieces and a fairly dense set of instructions. You build the Geckobot by snapping 176 plastic parts together; the instructions are quite clear, provided you take your time. Our young Lego fanatic builder got to work straight away, but his enthusiasm soon began to wane.

Geckobot
Simon Hill/Digital Trends
Simon Hill/Digital Trends

It takes some physical strength to press the pieces together securely, and once connected they are tricky to prize apart — a problem if you take a wrong turn, as we soon did. Luckily, Thames & Kosmos includes a wee tool in the box for loosening parts. The necessity of its inclusion should have been a warning to the designers.

Our Geckobot definitely sucked, but not in the way it was meant to.

The instructions guide you through the process of building the main body, which has a motor in the middle. You’ll need two AAA batteries (not supplied) to power this motor unit and a tiny Phillips-head screwdriver to open it (also not supplied).

The head and tail are built separately. You can choose from two included sets of eye stickers for the head. When you get to the tail you’ll have to grab the scissors for the tubing.

The final process involves cutting the tubing to specified lengths and wiring it up to the connectors on the Geckobot. This was fiddly, and once again it required a fair bit of strength to get the tubes connected. Mess up and the whole thing is ruined, so adult supervision is important for cutting the correct lengths. Also, wire the tubing wrong and your Geckobot’s suction-cup feet won’t work correctly, as we soon discovered.

But does it blendsuck?

It took around an hour and a half to build the robot. When finished, we flicked the tiny switch on the motor unit to turn it on and our reptilian robot began walking very slowly and loudly across the floor. The switch is right in the middle of the body and it’s quite awkward to get at, especially when the legs are moving.

Geckobot
Simon Hill/Digital Trends
Simon Hill/Digital Trends

The kids were excited to try it on the window and see if it really could climb, so we held the Geckobot on the window, turned it on, and let the suction cups do their work. The Geckobot was firmly attached to the glass — but it wasn’t moving.

We turned it off and went back to the instructions. The head and tail were attached the wrong way round, so we switched them, rewired it, and tried again. We also had to realign the feet by removing the gear cogs in the middle and rotating them to the correct positon. This time Geckobot took a couple of faltering steps before falling with a crash to the floor.

More rebuilding and tweaking, a quick clean for the suction feet, and the Geckobot was back on the glass, stuck fast and failing to take another step. The Geckobot may have been stubbornly refusing to climb, but by this time the kids were climbing the walls.

As can often happen with toys like this, Dad was left to figure out why it wasn’t working as the kids went off to play with something else. Further adjustment of the gears resulted in the Geckobot taking a few more steps up the glass, but it would always end up sticking or falling off. Each time it did, pieces popped out and wires came loose.

A wall-climbing robot sounds cool, but the reality is distinctly underwhelming. There’s no programming element to this “instructional” toy, it’s just a simple motor. Even when it did manage to climb it was very slow. By the end of the day the batteries were dead and the kids had lost interest.

There are a few more options for different models you can build in the manual. The suction gun and ellipsograph are fun ideas, the smartphone holder and inchworm not so much.

Warranty information

Thames & Kosmos provide a standard 12-month warranty that covers defective part replacement. But there’s no cover for broken parts or wear and tear, though you can order replacement parts from the Thames & Kosmos website.

Conclusion

Is there a better alternative?

If you don’t mind spending a lot more, Lego Mindstorms EV3 is the ultimate in kid’s robotics kits. We also prefer the style and accessibility of Littlebits, though it’s expensive too. The Geckobot only costs around $50, but even at that price, other Thames & Kosmos kits offer better value.

How long will it last?

Longevity is a serious concern for the Geckobot. There’s some fun in taking it apart and trying other models, but we’re not convinced about durability. Parts will break and go missing and the tubes simply don’t work very well. It also chews through batteries far too quickly.

Should you buy it?

No. If you’ve already tried other Thames & Kosmos kits and enjoyed them, it’s possible that the Geckobot could provide some fun — and the suction cup climbing is quite a unique feature. It’s far too tricky and fiddly for younger kids, however (we think 10+ is more appropriate than 8+), and older kids are likely to find it quite dull. This reviewer did. We think you can do better.

Simon Hill
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Simon Hill is an experienced technology journalist and editor who loves all things tech. He is currently the Associate Mobile…
Star Wars legend Ian McDiarmid gets questions about the Emperor’s sex life
Ian McDiarmid as the Emperor in Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker.

This weekend, the Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith 20th anniversary re-release had a much stronger performance than expected with $25 million and a second-place finish behind Sinners. Revenge of the Sith was the culmination of plans by Chancellor Palpatine (Ian McDiarmid) that led to the fall of the Jedi and his own ascension to emperor. Because McDiarmid's Emperor died in his first appearance -- 1983's Return of the Jedi -- Revenge of the Sith was supposed to be his live-action swan song. However, Palpatine's return in Star Wars: Episode IX -- The Rise of Skywalker left McDiarmid being asked questions about his character's comeback, particularly about his sex life and how he could have a granddaughter.

While speaking with Variety, McDiarmid noted that fans have asked him "slightly embarrassing questions" about Palpatine including "'Does this evil monster ever have sex?'"

Read more
Waymo and Toyota explore personally owned self-driving cars
Front three quarter view of the 2023 Toyota bZ4X.

Waymo and Toyota have announced they’re exploring a strategic collaboration—and one of the most exciting possibilities on the table is bringing fully-automated driving technology to personally owned vehicles.
Alphabet-owned Waymo has made its name with its robotaxi service, the only one currently operating in the U.S. Its vehicles, including Jaguars and Hyundai Ioniq 5s, have logged tens of millions of autonomous miles on the streets of San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix, and Austin.
But shifting to personally owned self-driving cars is a much more complex challenge.
While safety regulations are expected to loosen under the Trump administration, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has so far taken a cautious approach to the deployment of fully autonomous vehicles. General Motors-backed Cruise robotaxi was forced to suspend operations in 2023 following a fatal collision.
While the partnership with Toyota is still in the early stages, Waymo says it will initially study how to merge its autonomous systems with the Japanese automaker’s consumer vehicle platforms.
In a recent call with analysts, Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai signaled that Waymo is seriously considering expanding beyond ride-hailing fleets and into personal ownership. While nothing is confirmed, the partnership with Toyota adds credibility—and manufacturing muscle—to that vision.
Toyota brings decades of safety innovation to the table, including its widely adopted Toyota Safety Sense technology. Through its software division, Woven by Toyota, the company is also pushing into next-generation vehicle platforms. With Waymo, Toyota is now also looking at how automation can evolve beyond assisted driving and into full autonomy for individual drivers.
This move also turns up the heat on Tesla, which has long promised fully self-driving vehicles for consumers. While Tesla continues to refine its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software, it remains supervised and hasn’t yet delivered on full autonomy. CEO Elon Musk is promising to launch some of its first robotaxis in Austin in June.
When it comes to self-driving cars, Waymo and Tesla are taking very different roads. Tesla aims to deliver affordability and scale with its camera, AI-based software. Waymo, by contrast, uses a more expensive technology relying on pre-mapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar and lidar (a laser-light radar), that regulators have been quicker to trust.

Read more
Uber partners with May Mobility to bring thousands of autonomous vehicles to U.S. streets
uber may mobility av rides partnership

The self-driving race is shifting into high gear, and Uber just added more horsepower. In a new multi-year partnership, Uber and autonomous vehicle (AV) company May Mobility will begin rolling out driverless rides in Arlington, Texas by the end of 2025—with thousands more vehicles planned across the U.S. in the coming years.
Uber has already taken serious steps towards making autonomous ride-hailing a mainstream option. The company already works with Waymo, whose robotaxis are live in multiple cities, and now it’s welcoming May Mobility’s hybrid-electric Toyota Sienna vans to its platform. The vehicles will launch with safety drivers at first but are expected to go fully autonomous as deployments mature.
May Mobility isn’t new to this game. Backed by Toyota, BMW, and other major players, it’s been running AV services in geofenced areas since 2021. Its AI-powered Multi-Policy Decision Making (MPDM) tech allows it to react quickly and safely to unpredictable real-world conditions—something that’s helped it earn trust in city partnerships across the U.S. and Japan.
This expansion into ride-hailing is part of a broader industry trend. Waymo, widely seen as the current AV frontrunner, continues scaling its service in cities like Phoenix and Austin. Tesla, meanwhile, is preparing to launch its first robotaxis in Austin this June, with a small fleet of Model Ys powered by its camera-based Full Self-Driving (FSD) system. While Tesla aims for affordability and scale, Waymo and May are focused on safety-first deployments using sensor-rich systems, including lidar—a tech stack regulators have so far favored.
Beyond ride-hailing, the idea of personally owned self-driving cars is also gaining traction. Waymo and Toyota recently announced they’re exploring how to bring full autonomy to private vehicles, a move that could eventually bring robotaxi tech right into your garage.
With big names like Uber, Tesla, Waymo, and now May Mobility in the mix, the ride-hailing industry is evolving fast—and the road ahead looks increasingly driver-optional.

Read more