Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Juul sold tainted pods to people ‘drunk and vaping like mo-fos,’ lawsuit claims

Add as a preferred source on Google
 

A new lawsuit filed against Juul Labs on Tuesday claims the company shipped out one million contaminated e-cigarette products without telling anyone — or recalling them.

Recommended Videos

Filed by the company’s former senior vice president of finance, Siddharth Breja, the lawsuit, first reported by Buzzfeed, alleges that he experienced retaliation after raising his concerns to the then-CEO Kevin Burns. Breja suggested to Burns that the company should include some expiration date on its products, which Burns shot down. 

“Half our customers are drunk and vaping like mo-fos, who the fuck is going to notice the quality of our pods,” the lawsuit claims Burns said. 

Breja details in the lawsuit that Juul wanted to sell vaping pods that were about a year old. He said that batches of Juul’s mint e-liquid were found to be contaminated during a March 12 meeting. The lawsuit alleges that, nevertheless, nearly 250,000 mint refill kits were shipped to retailers and sold to customers. Buzzfeed reports that the kits add up to about one million pods. 

A little over a week after Breja raised his concerns about the contaminated products, on March 21, he was fired from Juul. 

“Mr. Breja became aware of very concerning actions at the company, and he performed his duty to shareholders and to the board by reporting these issues internally,” Breja’s attorney Harmeet Dhillon, told BuzzFeed. “In exchange for doing that, he was inappropriately terminated. This is very concerning, particularly since some of the issues he raised concerned matters of public safety.”

Breja said in the lawsuit that his actions were in response to concerns about the public’s safety amid the vaping illnesses that had just started occurring. 

As of October 22, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that 34 people have died and that there have been 1,604 cases of lung injuries caused by vaping. 

Juul has been at the forefront of the vaping illness epidemic. Federal authorities began a criminal investigation into the company in September, along with investigations from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). State attorneys general and the FTC are also looking into whether Juul targets minors with its marketing and flavored e-cigarettes. 

In June, San Francisco, where Juul is headquartered, became the first city in the U.S. to ban the sales of e-cigarettes. Since then, Massachusetts, Michigan, California, and New York have made similar bans to vaping products amid health concerns. President Donald Trump has also said that he wants to ban flavored e-cigarettes nationwide and issue new regulatory guidance on vapes. 

Juul advertises its vaping products as being a safer and healthier substitution to traditional cigarette smoking. However, studies consistently show e-cigarette smokers are less likely to quit than regular smokers who have never used these kinds of devices.

“Mr. Breja’s claims are baseless. He was terminated in March 2019 because he failed to demonstrate the leadership qualities needed in his role,” a Juul spokesperson told Digital Trends. “The allegations concerning safety issues with Juul products are equally meritless, and we already investigated the underlying manufacturing issue and determined the product met all applicable specifications. The company will vigorously defend this lawsuit.” 

Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
Your holiday photos could help scammers figure out exactly where you are
AI can extract surprisingly precise location clues from innocent-looking Instagram and Facebook posts, making phishing scams much more convincing.
Photo on a holiday during sunset

That innocent holiday snap might be doing more than showing everyone how good the weather is. A new scam highlighted by The Guardian shows how criminals can use AI to analyse photos posted on Instagram and Facebook, work out where they were taken, and then use that information to make phishing messages look frighteningly legitimate.

The trick is surprisingly simple. Imagine posting a few family photos from Porto without mentioning the city anywhere. A few days later, a text arrives claiming that your bank detected unusual card activity while you were travelling in Porto and asking you to verify your details through a link. Because the message contains a detail that only someone who knows about the trip should know, it suddenly feels much more convincing. Except the scammer may never have known about the trip at all. The photo told them.

Read more
Meta and Google just got beaten by an AI giant you might not expect
Alibaba's Qwen AI model running on an Android phone.

The AI race usually revolves around familiar names like OpenAI, Google, Meta, and Anthropic. But when it comes to models developers can actually download and build upon, another company has raced to the front — and by quite some distance. Alibaba says its Qwen family of open-weight AI models has crossed 3 billion downloads globally over the past six months. That puts Qwen ahead of some of the biggest names in AI, including models from Meta and Google.

The difference is especially striking in Hugging Face data for 2026. Google’s open models have recorded around 418 million downloads, while Meta sits at roughly 227 million, according to Hugging Face’s latest State of Open Models report. Qwen, meanwhile, is becoming much more than one popular model. Alibaba has released more than 460 Qwen models, and developers have created over 300,000 derivative models from them.

Read more
Meta promised to stop creepy AI glasses videos, but they’re still all over Instagram
Instagram app

Smart glasses can be genuinely useful, whether you’re taking a hands-free photo, listening to music, or asking an AI assistant about whatever is in front of you. Unfortunately, putting a camera on someone’s face also opens the door to some much less pleasant uses. That’s becoming a problem for Meta.

Instagram head Adam Mosseri said in July that the platform was working to remove videos in which people use Meta glasses to film and harass others secretly. However, a new Business Insider investigation suggests the cleanup isn’t going quite as smoothly as Meta might have hoped. The publication found dozens of pickup and prank videos still available on Instagram weeks after Mosseri’s comments. Some came from popular or verified creators, and several showed women being approached and recorded in public through Meta glasses.

Read more