Skip to main content

Maker Faires aren’t just the future of tech – they’re the future of America

I didn’t know what to expect ahead of my Pittsburgh visit a year ago. I mean, I had some ideas of what I might encounter on the streets of a city whose NFL team was named for industry that had fled its city limits some 30 years prior. I’ve seen the depressing evidence of areas corroded by the screeching halt of the rust belt on visits to the upper-midwest, Pennsylvania and portions of my current home state of New York. What I found, however, was a city revitalized, one with a sparkling downtown area and the sorts of museums and boutique shops we’ve come to associate with bustling metropolises.

In 1970, it was, of course, a different story entirely. That year, one in every three jobs in the Pennsylvania city was in manufacturing. A decade later the number dropped to one in four, as unemployment skyrocketed to 17.1 percent by 1983. These days, the city’s rate is below the national average. So, what happened? Part of the city’s successes can be chalked up to healthcare, one of those relatively recession-proof industries, but to many, the answer plays out like the plot of some bad sci-fi pulp paperback, with robots saving the city from the brink of disaster.

Recommended Videos

“Our parents and our grandparents created the world’s largest economy and strongest middle class by building stuff.”

Granted, Pittsburgh was playing with a bit of a stacked deck. In Carnegie-Mellon, the city has, arguably, the world’s most celebrated robotics university at its disposal — a considerable leg-up. Even still, having students move to your city to attend your prestigious robot school and actually getting them to stick around after graduation in order to launch their exciting new startup are two different things, especially when yours is a hard-luck city. In the mid-90s, the city now affectionately referred to as “Roboburgh” by those capable of saying such things with a straight face, started work on an economic revitalization plan whose impact is still being felt today. Companies such as Google, Apple and Intel have planted stakes in the once-depressed city.

Again, Pittsburgh’s path to success isn’t one that can be perfectly replicated by every American city suffering at the hands of a seemingly endless economic downturn, but the City of Bridge’s embrace of high technology carries an important lesson for each. That’s why it was so heartening to see (albeit sadly from afar in my case) the president engage with a 17-foot-long robotic giraffe on the White House lawn this week, as the administration hosted the first-ever White House Maker Faire, an event that brought together makers, educators, large companies focused on innovations and, naturally, politicians. It’s easy to write such things off a photo-ops, but somewhere deep inside of me there’s an optimist who sincerely believes that this could be the cusp of some new and whole distinct industrial revolution.

Here’s what President Obama had to say about the occasion, “Our parents and our grandparents created the world’s largest economy and strongest middle class not by buying stuff, but by building stuff — by making stuff, by tinkering and inventing and building; by making and selling things first in a growing national market and then in an international market — stuff ‘Made in America.’”

Again, prepared remarks penned by speech writers for inclusion in the White House PR machine, no doubt, but words that seem to point to some deeper understanding that these events are about so much more than shiny new tech toys: they’re a celebration of the sort of innovation that offers the most promising path to economic revival. Drilling down deeper, beyond the slideshow fodder points to some truly promising potential, a convergence of DIY innovators, STEM educators, established brands with a commitment to emerging technologies and governmental bodies.

The plan presents several tiers aimed at helping the US make up lost ground in the innovation and manufacturing that is increasingly shipped overseas. There’s the NIST manufacturing grant designed to help support small-scale startups, and an outreach program by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which has (rightfully) been getting some fairly negative press as of late when it comes to hardware innovation. There are a slew of small business grants from 11 agencies, including the EPA, Department of Transportation and NASA, which total over $2.5 million. Arguably most important, there are programs aimed at fostering making in educational programs.

A celebration of the sort of innovation that offers the most promising path to economic revival.

Honestly, it’s hard to read this laundry list of programs and not get at least a little excited by the potential it represents for both a transforming economy and future technologies. Amongst all of these bullet points, one particular initiative stands out for its potential to help some of the hardest hit areas. The Maker Education Initiative (Maker Ed) was designed to launch youth-oriented makerspaces in some of the highest poverty areas in some of the most economically depressed cities in the country.

Previously aimed at California, the Maker Ed AmeriCorps VISTA program is expanding to Baltimore, Detroit, Miami, San Antonio and good old Pittsburgh, targeting 22,000 kids in extremely impoverished areas. Could these sorts of programs truly turn around a city as hard hit as Detroit, where roughly 60 percent of children live in poverty? It’s going to take a lot of work, money and time, but Pittsburgh’s high tech-driven success points to a way out. The rate at which Makerspaces are popping up in the city is certainly promising. Those sorts of projects require a lot room and access to tools — things that Detroit has in excess.

And as I point out in an earlier column, a confluence of factors like crowdfunding, scaleable manufacturing and simple prototyping point to a bright future for hardware startups and hyper localized manufacturing. Seeing that promise fulfilled in tech hubs like the Silicon Valley, Austin and New York seems like a given. Seeing them bear fruit in the areas that need them the most, however, will take a long term investment, but the potential economic and technological payoffs will more than pay for themselves.

Brian Heater
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Brian Heater has worked at number of tech pubs, including Engadget, PCMag and Laptop. His writing has appeared in Spin…
ChatGPT’s awesome Deep Research gets a light version and goes free for all
Deep Research option for ChatGPT.

There’s a lot of AI hype floating around, and it seems every brand wants to cram it into their products. But there are a few remarkably useful tools, as well, though they are pretty expensive. ChatGPT’s Deep Research is one such feature, and it seems OpenAI is finally feeling a bit generous about it. 

The company has created a lightweight version of Deep Research that is powered by its new o4-mini language model. OpenAI says this variant is “more cost-efficient while preserving high quality.” More importantly, it is available to use for free without any subscription caveat. 

Read more
Star Wars legend Ian McDiarmid gets questions about the Emperor’s sex life
Ian McDiarmid as the Emperor in Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker.

This weekend, the Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith 20th anniversary re-release had a much stronger performance than expected with $25 million and a second-place finish behind Sinners. Revenge of the Sith was the culmination of plans by Chancellor Palpatine (Ian McDiarmid) that led to the fall of the Jedi and his own ascension to emperor. Because McDiarmid's Emperor died in his first appearance -- 1983's Return of the Jedi -- Revenge of the Sith was supposed to be his live-action swan song. However, Palpatine's return in Star Wars: Episode IX -- The Rise of Skywalker left McDiarmid being asked questions about his character's comeback, particularly about his sex life and how he could have a granddaughter.

While speaking with Variety, McDiarmid noted that fans have asked him "slightly embarrassing questions" about Palpatine including "'Does this evil monster ever have sex?'"

Read more
Waymo and Toyota explore personally owned self-driving cars
Front three quarter view of the 2023 Toyota bZ4X.

Waymo and Toyota have announced they’re exploring a strategic collaboration—and one of the most exciting possibilities on the table is bringing fully-automated driving technology to personally owned vehicles.
Alphabet-owned Waymo has made its name with its robotaxi service, the only one currently operating in the U.S. Its vehicles, including Jaguars and Hyundai Ioniq 5s, have logged tens of millions of autonomous miles on the streets of San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix, and Austin.
But shifting to personally owned self-driving cars is a much more complex challenge.
While safety regulations are expected to loosen under the Trump administration, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has so far taken a cautious approach to the deployment of fully autonomous vehicles. General Motors-backed Cruise robotaxi was forced to suspend operations in 2023 following a fatal collision.
While the partnership with Toyota is still in the early stages, Waymo says it will initially study how to merge its autonomous systems with the Japanese automaker’s consumer vehicle platforms.
In a recent call with analysts, Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai signaled that Waymo is seriously considering expanding beyond ride-hailing fleets and into personal ownership. While nothing is confirmed, the partnership with Toyota adds credibility—and manufacturing muscle—to that vision.
Toyota brings decades of safety innovation to the table, including its widely adopted Toyota Safety Sense technology. Through its software division, Woven by Toyota, the company is also pushing into next-generation vehicle platforms. With Waymo, Toyota is now also looking at how automation can evolve beyond assisted driving and into full autonomy for individual drivers.
This move also turns up the heat on Tesla, which has long promised fully self-driving vehicles for consumers. While Tesla continues to refine its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software, it remains supervised and hasn’t yet delivered on full autonomy. CEO Elon Musk is promising to launch some of its first robotaxis in Austin in June.
When it comes to self-driving cars, Waymo and Tesla are taking very different roads. Tesla aims to deliver affordability and scale with its camera, AI-based software. Waymo, by contrast, uses a more expensive technology relying on pre-mapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar and lidar (a laser-light radar), that regulators have been quicker to trust.

Read more