Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Meta is changing how it judges employees after an unusual AI experiment

Add as a preferred source on Google
meta-logo
Meta

AI might be taking over the workplace, but Meta employees apparently won’t need to prove quite so enthusiastically that they’re using it anymore. Meta has updated its performance review guidance so employees will no longer be evaluated based on how much they use AI tools, according to a new WIRED report. The change moves the company away from language around AI usage and puts the emphasis back on something considerably simpler: the actual impact of an employee’s work.

It sounds obvious, but the distinction matters. Meta told workers last year that “AI-driven impact” would factor into how they were evaluated, which encouraged employees to incorporate chatbots and AI agents into their everyday jobs. Workers could also receive labels such as “AI Native,” “AI First,” or “AI Enabled” based on their adoption of the technology. The result, according to some employees, was a workplace where using AI could occasionally become a goal in itself.

The strange era of ‘tokenmaxxing’

Some Meta employees began prompting AI tools more frequently simply to increase their internal usage numbers. That included watching how many AI tokens essentially the chunks of information AI models process they consumed. Things became competitive enough that one employee created an internal leaderboard ranking colleagues by AI usage, complete with titles such as “Token Legend.” The leaderboard was eventually removed after details about it became public earlier this year.

Meta is now clarifying expectations. Engineers were told this week that AI adoption dashboards and token counts won’t be used to measure their impact. The updated performance-review language also says employee outcomes “can be supported by AI or other means,” meaning using AI is still very much encouraged, but it isn’t necessarily the point. Meta spokesperson Tracy Clayton told WIRED that the company has always evaluated workers based on their contributions and said labels such as “AI Native” weren’t used for performance evaluations.

Meta isn’t exactly slowing down on AI

Don’t mistake the change for Meta suddenly becoming less interested in employees using artificial intelligence. If anything, the company’s workers are getting access to increasingly capable AI tools. Employees have recently been testing an experimental AI agent called Hatch on their corporate devices. Unlike a conventional chatbot that mostly responds to questions, Hatch can take actions on a computer, browse the web, and interact with other applications on a user’s behalf. It’s been available internally for several weeks and could eventually receive a public release.

That creates an interesting shift in Meta’s approach. Employees are still being encouraged to experiment with powerful AI systems, but simply racking up AI usage isn’t supposed to be the achievement anymore. Considering Meta reached the point where employees were competing to become “Token Legends,” judging the work rather than the token counter probably isn’t the worst reset.

Shimul Sood
Shimul is a contributor at Digital Trends, with over five years of experience in the tech space.
Students who use AI every day may be falling behind, while moderate users pull ahead
New global testing data suggests more AI in the classroom isn't automatically better.
Logo, Text

I assumed more AI access might help students learn faster. However, a new OECD study dispels that misconception for me and everyone else who gave their children a paid version of AI chatbots, thinking it would help them through their educational journey. 

According to PISA 2025 data from 760,000 students in 91 countries, students who use AI daily score meaningfully worse on standardized tests than their peers. The full picture is more complicated than a simple ban would fix.

Read more
XPENG just put its humanoid robot on the production line, and it walked itself out
IRON clocks in for its first shift
XPENG Iron

XPENG’s humanoid robot has officially joined the workforce, and it even got an employee badge. The Chinese automaker announced on September 8 that its next-generation IRON had completed assembly and autonomously walked off its newly commissioned humanoid robot production line in Guangzhou.

CEO He Xiaopeng then pinned a staff badge onto the robot, symbolically welcoming it to the XPENG team. It is a charming little ceremony for a machine that the company hopes will eventually become a regular part of everyday life. XPENG is moving IRON beyond R&D prototypes toward production-line manufacturing, applying the quality-control systems and manufacturing experience it has developed through its electric vehicle business.

Read more
An AI-designed drug might help slow aging, but we’re not there yet
The results hint at a possible anti-aging effect, but there’s still a long way to go before we know what it means.
medical test tubes

Rentosertib, a drug Insilico Medicine designed almost entirely using AI, was created to treat idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a disease that scars and stiffens the lungs over time. But fighting lung disease was only half the plan from the start.

According to a new study published in Nature Biotechnology, the drug's target was chosen specifically because it overlaps heavily with the biology of aging, and the whole trial was designed to test whether treating the lungs could also mean turning back the body's biological clock.

Read more