Skip to main content

The cyborg revolution has already begun, and you can’t even see it

As far as onstage catastrophes go, it could have been worse. But there I was, delivering a keynote in front of some 2,000 conference attendees and my slides wouldn’t advance. I kept mashing the button on the remote, my thumbnail white with pressure, nervously smiling at the audience as the screen stayed frozen on the first image, to no avail.

It turns out no level of dexterous digit mangling of the buttons would have mattered. As the AV crew apologetically explained to me afterward, the receiver was simply out of range. But tellingly, my most vivid memory from that day isn’t my frustration with the crew, it’s the oddly naked feeling I had on stage holding an ineffective remote. Having done many keynotes, the remote has become a part of me on stage, my thumb tapping the advance arrow without my even thinking about it as I hit my marks within a talk. Without it that day, I nearly felt I was missing an appendage.

Recommended Videos

As strange as it was, the sensation of physical loss I experienced is a sign of a broader bio-technical shift underway. We are rapidly moving toward a time when our everyday tech tools, and in particular our handheld and wearable devices, will feel as though they are — or may actually be — extensions of ourselves, rather than separate entities.

Change is in the air(waves)

Much of this phenomenon has to do with just two letters: RF. An abbreviation for radio frequency, RF waves are used in everything from Wi-Fi, to baby monitors, to FM radio, to communicate wirelessly. But it’s our handheld or strapped-on devices – our mobile phones, smartwatches, activity tracker wristbands and the like – and their use of RF that will drive bio-tech augmentation.

Surprisingly, we can even look to the far less sexy handheld, the TV remote, for a portentous glimpse of our future cyborg selves.

As we absorb these tiny advancements into our lives, eventually not having them quickly feels archaic.

For decades remote controls have operated on infrared (IR) technology, which requires line of sight to work — you have to aim the remote at the receiver for the signal to reach it. RF remotes, however, which have hit the mainstream in the last few years, allow the user to tap a button and reach the receiver without even seeing it, because RF waves travel through solid objects.

The advantages of RF remotes — not requiring line of sight; gaming applications (with the addition of accelerometers and gyroscopes) where one can swing her arms and create a mirror image of action on a screen; and with Roku’s remote, a headphone jack for outwardly silent viewing — are ostensibly minor. Yet sometimes those little details are what make the biggest impacts. It’s not for nothing that Roku’s headphone option has been dubbed the “marriage saver.” And while no longer needing to move your foot or the bowl of chips to change a channel seems an embarrassingly modest improvement over IR to get excited about, as we absorb these tiny advancements into our lives, eventually not having them quickly feels archaic.

It’s not hard to imagine a point where actually lifting your hand to aim at the TV will almost be an affront to modernity, the same way it is when your airline app on your phone craps out and you need to actually print a boarding pass at a kiosk. In one sense, of course, this is just an example of First Worlders being inconvenienced over trivialities. But on a deeper level, it highlights a disruption of the often imperceptible seamlessness of our products with ourselves.

You have to not see it to believe it

Perhaps the most pervasive yet rarely thought of effect of RF, and improved tech in general, is the aesthetic revolution of minimalism it has brought about. Think of someone’s home office 20 years ago, with its unruly tangle of wires to printers and fax machines, multiple phones, and clunky CPU towers. Compare it with the idealized spartan workspace of today, where nearly every device has shrunken in size, features a limited physical interface, and is, most notably, absent of wires.

This minimalism is more than cosmetic. Tech minimalism generally runs in tandem with functionality– usually the better a high tech device is, the more it can do in an ever smaller body. And the more functional our devices become, especially the portable or wearable ones, the more we are dependant on them. In turn, this utilitarian dependence takes on a psychological attachment leading to a projection of almost anthropomorphic importance. Our tools aren’t tools, they’re part of us.

Even without minimalism this relationship is apparent: It’s why a girlfriend of mine in college had a name for her beloved car. And why a carpenter surely feels a particular and peculiar bond to that one great hammer in his tool box (even if it could be replaced with an exact replica). Even our clothes are a technology in a philosophical sense, since they enhance our human capabilities. When you wear that old pair of jeans that fit perfectly, you’re likely no longer even aware that you are wearing them – this outside thing becomes one with yourself.

A vanishing line

Our new high-tech tools follow the same tradition, only with exponentially more profound effects. With a wearable electronic device that never leaves your body, or a handheld remote that effortlessly commands other objects into action, the seamlessness of tech and body integration is even more complete.

The more our tools advance, the more cyborg we will become.

Devices continue to shrink. Eventually, all applications will be embedded in one smartwatch, belt buckle, or molar filling, which we will control with voice commands and subtle gestures. Everything in our lives — the TV, thermostat, washer, toilet – will be linked on the Internet of Things, and easily controllable from this one little RF-enabled device. The divide between technology and body, almost needless to say, will simply vanish.

Today, we still tend to view tech devices as separate tools, distinct from us. But the more our tools advance, the more cyborg we will become. Our biological selves will be so integrated with our tools that the very notion of IRL (in real life) versus our online or connected selves will be a moot discussion.

David Zweig
Former Digital Trends Contributor
David Zweig is a journalist based in New York. His most recent book, Invisibles: The Power of Anonymous Work in an Age of…
What happened to Amazon’s inaugural Project Kuiper launch?
Official Imagery for Amazon Project Kuiper.

Amazon is aiming to take on SpaceX’s Starlink internet service using thousands of its own Project Kuiper satellites in low-Earth orbit.

The first Project Kuiper satellites were suppsoed to launch aboard a United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V rocket from Cape Canaveral in Florida on April 9, but rough weather conditions forced the mission team to scrub the planned liftoff.

Read more
EVs top gas cars in German reliability report — but one weak spot won’t quit
future electric cars 2021 volkswagen id4 official 32

Electric vehicles are quietly crushing old stereotypes about being delicate or unreliable, and the data now backs it up in a big way. According to Germany’s ADAC — Europe’s largest roadside assistance provider — EVs are actually more reliable than their internal combustion engine (ICE) counterparts. And this isn’t just a small study — it’s based on a staggering 3.6 million breakdowns in 2024 alone.
For cars registered between 2020 and 2022, EVs averaged just 4.2 breakdowns per 1,000 vehicles, while ICE cars saw more than double that, at 10.4 per 1,000. Even with more EVs hitting the road, they only accounted for 1.2% of total breakdowns — a big win for the battery-powered crowd.
Among standout performers, some cars delivered exceptionally low breakdown rates. The Audi A4 clocked in at just 0.4 breakdowns per 1,000 vehicles for 2022 models, with Tesla’s Model 3 right behind at 0.5. The Volkswagen ID.4, another popular EV, also impressed with a rate of 1.0 – as did the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross at 1.3. On the flip side, there were some major outliers: the Hyundai Ioniq 5 showed a surprisingly high 22.4 breakdowns per 1,000 vehicles for its 2022 models, while the hybrid Toyota RAV4 posted 18.4.
Interestingly, the most common issue for both EVs and ICE vehicles was exactly the same: the humble 12-volt battery. Despite all the futuristic tech in EVs, it’s this old-school component that causes 50% of all EV breakdowns, and 45% for gas-powered cars. Meanwhile, EVs shine in categories like engine management and electrical systems — areas where traditional engines are more complex and failure-prone.
But EVs aren’t completely flawless. They had a slightly higher rate of tire-related issues — 1.3 breakdowns per 1,000 vehicles compared to 0.9 for ICE cars. That could be due to their heavier weight and high torque, which can accelerate tire wear. Still, this trend is fading in newer EVs as tire tech and vehicle calibration improve.
Now, zooming out beyond Germany: a 2024 Consumer Reports study in the U.S. painted a different picture. It found that EVs, especially newer models, had more reliability issues than gas cars, citing tech glitches and inconsistent build quality. But it’s worth noting that the American data focused more on owner-reported problems, not just roadside breakdowns.
So, while the long-term story is still developing, especially for older EVs, Germany’s data suggests that when it comes to simply keeping you on the road, EVs are pulling ahead — quietly, efficiently, and with far fewer breakdowns than you might expect.

Read more
You can now lease a Hyundai EV on Amazon—and snag that $7,500 tax credit
amazon autos hyundai evs lease ioniq 6 n line seoul mobility show 2025 mk08

Amazon has changed how we shop for just about everything—from books to furniture to groceries. Now, it’s transforming the way we lease cars. Through Amazon Autos, you can now lease a brand-new Hyundai entirely online—and even better, you’ll qualify for the full $7,500 federal tax credit if you choose an electric model like the Ioniq 5, Ioniq 6, or Kona EV.
Here’s why that matters: As of January 2025, Hyundai’s EVs no longer qualify for the tax credit if you buy them outright, due to strict federal rules about battery sourcing and final assembly. But when you lease, the vehicle is technically owned by the leasing company (Hyundai Capital), which allows it to be classified as a “commercial vehicle” under U.S. tax law—making it eligible for the credit. That savings is typically passed on to you in the form of lower lease payments.
With Amazon’s new setup, you can browse Hyundai’s EV inventory, secure financing, trade in your current vehicle, and schedule a pickup—all without leaving the Amazon ecosystem.
It’s available in 68 markets across the U.S., and pricing is fully transparent—no hidden fees or haggling. While Hyundai is so far the only automaker fully participating, more are expected to join over time.
Pioneered by the likes of Tesla, purchasing or leasing vehicles online has been a growing trend since the Covid pandemic.
A 2024 study by iVendi found that 74% of car buyers expect to use some form of online process for their next purchase. In fact, 75% said online buying met or exceeded expectations, with convenience and access to information cited as top reasons. The 2024 EY Mobility Consumer Index echoed this trend, reporting that 25% of consumers now plan to buy their next vehicle online—up from 18% in 2021. Even among those who still prefer to finalize the purchase at a dealership, 87% use online tools for research beforehand.
Meanwhile, Deloitte’s 2025 Global Automotive Consumer Study reveals that while 86% of U.S. consumers still want to test-drive a vehicle in person, digital tools are now a critical part of the buying journey.
Bottom line? Amazon is making it easier than ever to lease an EV and claim that tax credit—without the dealership hassle. If you're ready to plug in, it might be time to add to cart.

Read more