Skip to main content

Check out the winners of this year's 1,900-mile World Solar Challenge race

In case you missed it, the World Solar Challenge — a solar-powered car race that pits cozens of teams against each other in a 1,900 mile race across the Australian outback– happened this past week week. Ever since 1987, the WSC has sent teams from Darwin in Australia’s Northern Territory across the Outback into Adelaide, the capital of South Australia. The teams that placed in the 2015 challenge come from all over the world, but each team’s eight-day trek from Darwin to Adelaide was completed in a whole new class of renewable energy vehicle.

The difficulties of any long-distance race are clear from an engineering standpoint, but completing the course in solar-powered cars presents international teams with a unique set of challenges. The World Solar Challenge rules and regulations were inspired by the original idea that a 1000 Watt car could complete the journey from Darwin to Adelaide in 50 hours. Ten percent of that energy projection is allotted to solar cars in the challenge: 5 kilowatt hours of stored energy per charge. After that, the Challenge hopes to encourage the development of the world’s most efficient electric vehicles technologies, pushing teams to maximize the power in every charge, source energy from the sun, and recover kinetic energy from the vehicle itself.

Recommended Videos

The race is split into three separate groups that compete simultaneously: the Challenger Class, Cruiser Class, and Adventure Class. Each of these classes focus on a different feat of solar power engineering, and teams that compete within them must meet a strict set of criteria. Here’s a breakdown of the 2015 race results.

Challenger Class Winner: Nuon Solar w/ Nuna 8

nuon_solar_WSC
Nuon Solar

Challenger Class competitors race in smaller cars designed to carry one driver alone, and aim to beat the best time for each day as they reach checkpoints along the single, complete stage from Darwin to Adelaide. Entrants in the Challenger Class are also required to complete the entire stage with one battery charge, relying on solar power to fuel whatever is left of the journey after that charge expires.

This year, the Dutch dominated at the top of the podium, with Nuon Solar winning first place for the second consecutive time. Nuon Solar already has the first-place 2013 Challenger Class title to its name, and this year’s Nuna 8 is an improvement on the previous Nuna 7 model. The team’s strategy over the years has relied on the lightweight, durable quality of 3D printed materials to keep weight low and efficiency high. The spoiler on the Nuna 8 was completely 3D printed, and only weighed 250 grams. In their victory celebration at the finish line, some of the team’s leadership pointed out the trouble with cloud coverage when racing a solar-powered car.

Cruiser Class Winner: Team Eindhoven w/ Stella Lux

Nederland, Eindhoven, 2 juli 2015. Stella Lux, de 2e familie zonnewagen van Solar Team Eindhoven, het studententeam van de Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. // Stella Lux, the 2nd solar family car by Solar Team Eindhoven, the studentteam of Eindhoven University of Technology. photo: TU Eindhoven / Bart van Overbeeke
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Cruiser Class competitors race with one driver and one passenger in each vehicle, and their times are scored based on two halves of the journey instead of day-long destination stages. The first stage in the Cruiser Class spans from Darwin to Alice Springs, the route’s midway point between Darwin and Adelaide. The stop in Alice Springs affords Cruiser Class competitors the chance to recharge their vehicle’s batteries, but that means that for two legs of the race (between Darwin and Alice Springs and between Alice Springs and the finish line in Adelaide) vehicles have to run completely on solar power to supplement their battery charge.

Eindhoven’s team won this year’s Cruiser Class in the Stella Lux: an updated version of their 2013 Stella vehicle. Their 2015 upgrades focused on a redesigned body that features a wind tunnel aligned with the center of the car. This kind of aerodynamic design helped to reduce the energy expenditure of the car while on course, which is crucial when competing in the Cruiser Class. Overall, the Stella Lux weighs 826 pounds and is made mostly of carbon fiber. Since Cruiser Class vehicles are required to carry more weight over a greater distance with less access to grid charging, 3D printing isn’t always a viable option.

Adventure Class Winner: TAFE SA w/ Solar Spirit

tafesa
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The Adventure Class allows cars built for previous editions of the event to run again, usually with new team members. This bracket is generally used as a catchment for under-funded teams that haven’t quite met all the strict race requirements of the Challenger or Cruiser classes — so it’s often filled with student teams and independent groups without a lot of sponsors. As such, this race is usually a bit less competitive

This year, no cars from the Adventure Class actually finished the entire 1,900 mile (3022 km) course. In the end, it came down to which car had traveled the furthest distance in the least amount of time, with the Australian student team TAFE SA taking the top spot in its Solar Spirit vehicle. The car managed to travel 809 miles in 47 hours before going out, at which point it had to be trailered to the finish line.

Chloe Olewitz
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Chloe is a writer from New York with a passion for technology, travel, and playing devil's advocate. You can find out more…
Rivian set to unlock unmapped roads for Gen2 vehicles
rivian unmapped roads gen2 r1t gallery image 0

Rivian fans rejoice! Just a few weeks ago, Rivian rolled out automated, hands-off driving for its second-gen R1 vehicles with a game-changing software update. Yet, the new feature, which is only operational on mapped highways, had left many fans craving for more.
Now the company, which prides itself on listening to - and delivering on - what its customers want, didn’t wait long to signal a ‘map-free’ upgrade will be available later this year.
“One feedback we’ve heard loud and clear is that customers love [Highway Assist] but they want to use it in more places,” James Philbin, Rivian VP of autonomy, said on the podcast RivianTrackr Hangouts. “So that’s something kind of exciting we’re working on, we’re calling it internally ‘Map Free’, that we’re targeting for later this year.”
The lag between the release of Highway Assist (HWA) and Map Free automated driving gives time for the fleet of Rivian vehicles to gather ‘unique events’. These events are used to train Rivian’s offline model in the cloud before data is distilled back to individual vehicles.
As Rivian founder and CEO RJ Scaringe explained in early March, HWA marked the very beginning of an expanding automated-driving feature set, “going from highways to surface roads, to turn-by-turn.”
For now, HWA still requires drivers to keep their eyes on the road. The system will send alerts if you drift too long without paying attention. But stay tuned—eyes-off driving is set for 2026.
It’s also part of what Rivian calls its “Giving you your time back” philosophy, the first of three pillars supporting Rivian’s vision over the next three to five years. Philbin says that philosophy is focused on “meeting drivers where they are”, as opposed to chasing full automation in the way other automakers, such as Tesla’s robotaxi, might be doing.
“We recognize a lot of people buy Rivians to go on these adventures, to have these amazing trips. They want to drive, and we want to let them drive,” Philbin says. “But there’s a lot of other driving that’s very monotonous, very boring, like on the highway. There, giving you your time back is how we can give the best experience.”
This will also eventually lead to the third pillar of Rivian’s vision, which is delivering Level 4, or high-automation vehicles: Those will offer features such as auto park or auto valet, where you can get out of your Rivian at the office, or at the airport, and it goes off and parks itself.
While not promising anything, Philbin says he believes the current Gen 2 hardware and platforms should be able to support these upcoming features.
The second pillar for Rivian is its focus on active safety features, as the EV-maker rewrote its entire autonomous vehicle (AV) system for its Gen2 models. This focus allowed Rivian’s R1T to be the only large truck in North America to get a Top Safety Pick+ from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
“I believe there’s a lot of innovation in the active safety space, in terms of making those features more capable and preventing more accidents,” Philbin says. “Really the goal, the north star goal, would be to have Rivian be one of the safest vehicles on the road, not only for the occupants but also for other road users.”

Read more
Jaguar Land Rover, Nissan hit the brake on shipments to U.S. over tariffs
Range Rover Sport P400e

Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) has announced it will pause shipments of its UK-made cars to the United States this month, while it figures out how to respond to President Donald Trump's 25% tariff on imported cars.

"As we work to address the new trading terms with our business partners, we are taking some short-term actions, including a shipment pause in April, as we develop our mid- to longer-term plans," JLR said in a statement sent to various media.

Read more
DeepSeek readies the next AI disruption with self-improving models
DeepSeek AI chatbot running on an iPhone.

Barely a few months ago, Wall Street’s big bet on generative AI had a moment of reckoning when DeepSeek arrived on the scene. Despite its heavily censored nature, the open source DeepSeek proved that a frontier reasoning AI model doesn’t necessarily require billions of dollars and can be pulled off on modest resources.

It quickly found commercial adoption by giants such as Huawei, Oppo, and Vivo, while the likes of Microsoft, Alibaba, and Tencent quickly gave it a spot on their platforms. Now, the buzzy Chinese company’s next target is self-improving AI models that use a looping judge-reward approach to improve themselves.

Read more