Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Entertainment
  4. News

Your next cinema trip could come with a Meta smart glasses ban

Add as a preferred source on Google
Face, Head, Person
Ray-ban

Smart glasses are supposed to make it easier to capture moments without pulling out your phone. But when that moment happens to be the latest movie playing inside a theater, things get a little more complicated. Cinemas across the UK are considering restrictions on camera-equipped smart glasses, including Meta’s Ray-Ban, over concerns that people could use them to secretly record and pirate movies.

The UK Cinema Association (UKCA), which represents cinema operators across the country, says some venues are looking at policies that would either restrict or completely prohibit camera-enabled glasses. There don’t appear to be any widespread bans among its members yet, but that could change as smart glasses become more common.

Smart glasses create a new headache for movie theaters

Piracy has always been something cinemas have had to worry about, but smart glasses make the problem particularly awkward. Someone holding up a smartphone or camera during a movie is relatively easy to spot. A pair of glasses sitting on someone’s face? Not so much. Meta’s glasses do have a privacy feature designed to make recording more obvious. An LED on the front flashes while the camera is being used, and Meta says it has safeguards intended to prevent people from simply covering the light and recording unnoticed.

That hasn’t completely eased concerns around the technology, though. People have already complained that they were filmed without realizing it, and smart glasses have faced resistance elsewhere in the UK. ATG Theatres, for example, doesn’t allow filming during performances and says customers wearing smart glasses may be asked to remove them. Wetherspoons has also criticized camera-equipped glasses, with CEO Tim Martin arguing that people shouldn’t be able to record customers or staff without permission. Movie theaters now have another reason to be cautious: a pair of glasses could potentially become a hands-free camcorder pointed at the screen for an entire movie.

But banning them isn’t quite that simple

There’s another side to this story, because smart glasses aren’t only tiny cameras strapped to someone’s face. Meta argues that its glasses can be genuinely useful, particularly for blind and low-vision users. Features such as live translation and hands-free assistance can also make the technology more accessible in situations where constantly reaching for a phone isn’t practical. The UKCA acknowledges this, too. Smart glasses could potentially help moviegoers with accessibility needs, including by providing personalized subtitles. A blanket ban could therefore remove something genuinely useful while trying to solve the piracy problem.

That leaves cinemas with a surprisingly tricky balancing act. They need to protect movies and the privacy of everyone inside the theater without unnecessarily shutting out people who rely on the technology. The UKCA says this is still a developing issue and that policies will need to remain proportionate as the technology evolves. But with smart glasses becoming increasingly capable, cinemas may soon have to decide whether your next trip to the movies includes leaving them at home.

Shimul Sood
Shimul is a contributor at Digital Trends, with over five years of experience in the tech space.
Tiny robots could shrink weeks of heart infection treatment into a single day
Forget open-heart surgery, because these rice-sized robots take the express route to your heart.
heart being treated by tiny robot

Treating a heart infection is no walk in the park. Patients often spend weeks on IV antibiotics, and if that fails, open-heart surgery enters the picture. Johns Hopkins University engineers may have found a better way.

The team has developed magnetic “millirobots” that are about as wide as a pencil tip and roughly as long as a grain of rice. As detailed in their study published in Advanced Materials Technologies, the robots are designed to deliver medicine directly to infected heart tissue.

Read more
Meta goes toe-to-toe with the big boys as it launches Muse Wonder AI models
Illustration of Meta Muse Wonder AI model.

It's raining frontier AI models. Soon after Anthropic set alarm bells ringing with its Claude Fable model at the summit of AI peformance, OpenAI answered with GPT-6 Astra. Not one to be left behind, Google released Gemini 4 Argon. The race is now getting hotter as Meta enters the fray with two new AI models in the Muse series: Wonder and Wonder Full. Cheesy naming aside, these Meta AI models mean business, or at least that's what the benchmark figures suggest. More importantly, these AI models are already making their way to Muse users.

https://twitter.com/DigitalTrends/status/2109699549375988120

Read more
AI can’t tell if you’re gay or straight, but it thinks it knows what both look like
AI knows it shouldn't judge a face, but apparently, drawing one is a different story.
Emilia Clarke AI generated stock image. Gemini / Nano Banana is on the left

We've all been told not to judge a book by its cover, and you'd think AI would follow that rule, too. Ask an AI chatbot to guess someone's sexual orientation just by looking at their face, and it'll likely tell you that there's no reliable way to know. But what happens when you ask that same model to change someone's appearance to match a particular sexual orientation? Well, that's where things get uncomfortable.

A new study, accepted for presentation at the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, found that AI models from OpenAI and Google can be inconsistent when handling sensitive personal characteristics. They might refuse to make assumptions about someone based on their appearance, but when asked to generate those same assumptions visually, the results tell a very different story.

Read more