Skip to main content

Call of Duty: Vanguard’s messy alpha has me worried about the future

Over the weekend of August 27, Activision and Sledgehammer Games released a limited-time alpha for the upcoming Call of Duty: Vanguard. It featured the debut of a new online mode called Champion Hill — a fresh take on an elimination-style competition.

While the mode itself showed promise, numerous gameplay design decisions point to a troublesome product overall and make me worried for the full release. It’s possible many of its issues will be addressed once the full game launches, while others will probably get swept under the rug.

Champion Hill shows promise

Promotional art for Call of Duty: Vanguard alpha.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Before diving into the plethora of issues this alpha had, I want to acknowledge just how creative of a premise Champion Hill is. In it, eight teams of two start off with 12 lives and are paired against one another individually. The final release will feature teams of three, as well as solo competitions. In somewhat of a round-robin approach, teams are whittled away as eliminate one another in short, fast-paced deathmatches. Within each round, players are thrown into small maps to compete head-to-head with another squad in a fight to the death.

Holding everything together is an in-game economy that allows players to spend cash on killstreaks, perks, equipment, and weapons. Cash is found littered throughout each map and is rewarded upon the conclusion of a round. This is a unique approach that borrows elements from Warzone, while stripping away much of what makes the battle royale so complicated. It’s easy to understand, while still offering enough strategy to make each match enticing to play.

The mode certainly has its problems, like the inability to use streaks at will. Instead, they automatically activate at the start of the next round, which removes the agency and strategy of using a streak. Overall, however, Champion Hill is shaping up to be a strong mode that can be made even better with a few tweaks here and there.

The main problem is that terrible design decisions could threaten the full game.

Forest for the trees

Promotional art of squad in Call of Duty: Vanguard.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Right off the bat, the game’s most noticeable issue has to do with its visuals. Specifically, the artistic design of a game that takes place during World War II is, unsurprisingly, dark and muddy, which works well from an immersion perspective. During an online competition, however, the muddy color palette makes it difficult to distinguish opponents from the environment around them. In fact, there were numerous situations in which we’d simply look for the red name tag that appears above the heads of other players to determine their location. Since this is a fundamental artistic design decision, it’s tough to imagine it will change much in the final release, which is a shame.

I would often be gunned down by an opponent without knowing where they were until we’d watch the killcam — only to discover they were straight in front of us, disguised by their surroundings. While this is certainly realistic, it makes the game less fun.

Audiophile’s nightmare

Coupled with the terrible visual issues, Vanguard has even more problems with its audio design. Granted, this is far more likely to be fixed in the final build, but the overabundance of issues is still concerning. Competitive Call of Duty players often rely on audio cues to make split-second gameplay decisions. For instance, it’s a good idea to turn around when players hear an enemy approaching from behind. The problem with Vanguard so far is that enemy footsteps were often masked by the sound of gunfire going on elsewhere, outside of the map itself.

In Call of Duty, it’s common to hear gunfire from outside of the match as a way to set the tone, adding more immersion, but in the Vanguard alpha, all of the surrounding sounds are so loud that it’s near impossible to hear enemy footsteps. Since audio cues are such a major aspect of the Call of Duty experience, it was jarring to get taken out by an enemy who should have been easy to hear. In the final build, we’d expect to be able to hear a variety of sounds in the distance, but they shouldn’t be so loud that enemy footsteps are indistinguishable — especially when they’re nearby.

The minimap is practically useless

Armored soldier in Call of Duty: Vanguard.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Traditionally in Call of Duty, players firing unsuppressed weapons would appear as a red dot on the minimap. This is a feature that has appeared in many other games and is quite standard at this point. It’s great because it makes it easy to find opponents and keeps up the pacing of a match. However, Vanguard is running on the same engine as 2019’s Modern Warfare, which utilizes a significantly different minimap system. Instead, players only appear as a red dot on the compass toward the top of the HUD, which is far less precise than the minimap. They don’t show up on the minimap when firing an unsuppressed weapon. The only time players appear is when a Spy Plane is used, which might not happen often during any given match. Ultimately, this makes it difficult to tell where enemies are, especially since the audio and visuals were lacking in the alpha.

It was a constant battle of trying to wade through the drab structures while being overpowered by the sounds of explosives and gunfire from afar, coupled with the inability to tell where enemies were. Many matches consisted of us haphazardly running around the map with no rhyme or reason, which left a lot up to chance. This was even more frustrating than you might expect since the spawns were so bad. Enemies would frequently spawn behind us, leading to an unfair elimination. The spawn issue has been addressed, fortunately.

Looking ahead

The Vanguard alpha actually had way more wrong with it than we have covered above, but thankfully, Sledgehammer Games has acknowledged these criticisms. Sledgehammer took to Twitter to highlight many of the most prominent points of feedback, including visibility when damaged and spawn tuning.

Issues we’re addressing include:

– Visibility when damaged
– Spawn tuning
– Map visibility
– Audio mix tuning
– Name plate visibility issues
– Aim assist through destructible walls

— Sledgehammer Games (@SHGames) August 28, 2021

The company also acknowledged audio mix tuning, which could be in line with our feedback about being unable to hear enemy footsteps, but that is unclear. It was an alpha, so issues are expected, but oddly enough, hardly any of them were glitches or bugs. They all seemed to be design oversights that significantly impacted the overall enjoyment of the game. Individually, these problems might not amount to much, but overall, we’re worried about Vanguard.

Call of Duty: Vanguard launches on November 5 for PS4, PS5, Xbox One, Xbox Series X/S, and PC.

Editors' Recommendations

Joseph Yaden
Joseph Yaden is a freelance journalist who covers Nintendo, shooters, and horror games. He mostly covers game guides for…
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III has seemingly leaked thanks to Monster
Five main characters from Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II.

It looks like Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III will be the title of this year's Call of Duty game. Following several leaks, including an undeniable one connected to Monster Energy, a joking tweet from the official Call of Duty Twitter account appears to confirm that this is true.
Leaks suggesting that 2023's Call of Duty game is Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III have existed for months, but ramped up recently. On July 17, the Call of Duty Twitter account put up tweets asking if Operators, weapons, and bundles from Modern Warfare II should carry over to this year's game and teasing that a big reveal would happen alongside the unveiling of Season 5. Later that day, Bloomberg's Jason Schreier stated that this is a Sledgehammer Games-led project that started as an expansion and morphed into a full game.
Then, Monday morning, images of Monster Energy promotional materials connected to Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III emerged on Twitter, giving us confirmation of the name and our first look at the game's logo.

A leak like this is pretty difficult to deny, so Activision decided to play along with it. "Whew. Mondays," the official Call of Duty account tweeted. "Anyone have an energy drink they can spare?"
While not a traditional, explicit announcement, this tweet confirms the validity of the Monster Energy leak and affirms that this year's Call of Duty will be a direct follow-up to 2022's Modern Warfare II. Now, we'll just have to wait and see when Activision decides to officially reveal more about Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III itself. 
Because it's not officially announced yet, we don't know what Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III's release date or launch platforms are. Still, it's likely that it will launch across PC, PlayStation, and Xbox sometime this October or November after Microsoft's Activision Blizzard acquisition closes. 

Read more
You’re probably using the wrong close-range Warzone weapon
Call of Duty Warzone screenshot of 3 characters walking towards the camera.

Following the Call of Duty: Warzone Season 4 Reloaded update, players have flocked to various close-range weapons, including the Lachmann Sub, the FSS Hurricane, or the ISO 45. However, these close-range weapons pale in comparison to the X13 Auto, a sidearm that has found its way to the top of the close-range meta.

The beauty of this weapon is that, not only does it take down your foes faster than any SMG in the game, but it also doesn't require the use of the Overkill perk, as it's just a sidearm. But how exactly should you build the X13 Auto? Here's a recommended loadout, which focuses on practicality up-close. Just use it while you still can, as it may not last long.
The best X13 Auto loadout

Read more
Vondel is the best Call of Duty: Warzone map ever and it’s not even close
Characters on the Vondel map in Warzone.

Since Call of Duty: Warzone's release in 2020, Activision has released a number of battle royale maps -- some of which have captivated a large audience. Think Verdansk, Rebirth Island, and Fortune's Keep. Though, with the new version of Warzone (formerly referred to as Warzone 2.0), the maps haven't garnered the same positive buzz ... until now.

Alongside the release of Season 4, Activision released the new Vondel map, which takes place in an urban Netherlands city, full of various buildings, a canal, and even a public transit system (via ground or water). Vondel isn't just great, it's the best Warzone map ever made.
What is Vondel?

Read more