Skip to main content

Microsoft settles its legal dispute with Fox and can finally make a new Killer Instinct

killer instinct xbla
Image used with permission by copyright holder

There is a lost generation of video game players that hear the name Rare Inc. and don’t immediately think of Microsoft’s Kinect or the Xbox 360’s weirdly sterile avatars. During the mid-90’s, Rare was king. The developer was busy churning out some of the best video games of the decade, from Donkey Kong Country to GoldenEye 007. Rare was on top, and eventually was purchased by Microsoft in 2002 for the cool sum of $375 million. But things change, and the once great industry giant now focuses its attention on smaller games made for niche audiences. Rare has had moderate success with titles like Kinect Sports and the Viva Piñata series, but that older generation haven’t forgotten. If Rare is lucky, and if it is smart, a recent legal decision, however, may provide it with just the “in” it needs to get back on top. 

It’s been more than a decade and a half since the last Killer Instinct game came out for Nintendo 64, but even now there are fans that have been holding out hope for a new sequel in Rare’s long lost fighting game series, even though the property was locked up in a bitter legal battle. As of Thursday though, Microsoft and Rare can finally, legally make another Killer Instinct.

In September, Microsoft spurred new rumors that it was making Killer Instinct 3, or at the very least preparing an HD re-release of the original Killer Instinct, when it renewed its trademark for the series. It wasn’t quiet about it, either.

“With all due respect to our friends in the media who like to frequent trademark sites, we thought we’d break this one ourselves,” said Microsoft, “Our legal eagles have authorized us to say: ‘We have either renewed or re-filed a trademark application [for Killer Instinct] in various jurisdictions.”

Unfortunately for fans, Microsoft spoke too soon, and it wasn’t allowed to keep the trademark. The United States Patent and Trademark Office denied Microsoft’s application because News Corp.’s Fox currently owned the trademark for the name. Fox wasn’t planning on making its own game where people have improbably names like Fulgore though. It held the name because of a shortlived television drama from 2005 also named Killer Instinct. That dispute has officially been settled.

The USPTO announced that Fox and Microsoft have entered a Coexistence Agreement wherein the two companies have agreed to not break each other’s combos if either tries to make anything called “Killer Instinct” in the future. 

With that settled, will Microsoft let Rare get to work on Killer Instinct 3? Microsoft Studios creative chief Ken Lobb would certainly like to. Lobb is, after all, the creator of the series. “I obviously have personal feelings about Killer Instinct, but I do think it’s got a place,” said Lobb at the X10 event three years ago, “Let’s bring back something that people loved in the past and see how it does on Live Arcade.”

When it comes to the battle between Sony and Microsoft in the console wars, one clear advantage Sony has had has been in console exclusives. There is no reason to believe that that will change significantly with the next-gen of systems, as Sony’s list of internal studios continues to grow. With a still fairly well-known property like Killer Instinct just sitting there, it’s hard not to imagine that Microsoft wouldn’t at least consider reviving the franchise as an exclusive for its next Xbox. 

Nostalgia for the ‘90s is big business these days. Fans should brush up on their Orchid skills anyway and practice that 76 hit ultra combo from Cinder. Just in case.

Editors' Recommendations

Anthony John Agnello
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Anthony John Agnello is a writer living in New York. He works as the Community Manager of Joystiq.com and his writing has…
The Nintendo Switch just got 2 surprise games — and they’re both worth grabbing
A teddy beat sits on an embroidery hoop in Stitch.

If you were unable to catch this week's Nintendo IndieWorld showcase, then you missed a surprisingly loaded show. Lorelei and the Laser Eyes got a May release date, WayForward showed off its Yars' Revenge revival, and Steamworld Heist 2 got an exciting reveal. In the midst of all those headlines, two smaller games were surprise released on the platform: Stitch and Sticky Business. Don't sleep on either of them, as they're both worth a purchase.

Both games are ports of previously released games, but both went a bit under the radar upon their original launch. Sticky Business modestly launched last summer on PC, whereas Stitch has actually been around since 2022 as an Apple Arcade exclusive. The latter even has an Apple Vision Pro version now that can be played in mixed reality. I can't blame anyone for missing either, but their Switch releases offer a good opportunity to catch up with some quiet hidden gems.

Read more
Is this Razer’s Steam Deck killer?
The Razer Kishi Ultra sitting on a table.

Razer has been oddly quiet in the burgeoning world of handheld gaming PCs. When I met up with the company at the Game Developers Conference (GDC) to learn about its new products, I was happy to hear it had an answer to the success of the Steam Deck.

But it was not the type of answer I was expecting.

Read more
The best iPhone emulators
A collage of the delta emulator.

The market for iPhone games has become so wide and diverse that it can realistically compete with most console and PC offerings. Where we once only got cheap time-wasters, we now have complete experiences that don't feel any less impressive than what the competition offers. In fact, a lot of games made for consoles are appearing on the iPhone now that it is becoming so powerful. However, older games have paradoxically been mostly absent from the app store. That all could be about to change as emulation is now allowed on iPhone, though with some caveats that any retro fan should know about before getting too excited to play all your favorite NES games on your phone. Here's what's up with iPhone emulators, as well as our picks for a few of the best ones you can get right now.
What you need to know about emulation on iPhone
Emulators on iPhone, as well as emulation in general, are in a strange legal gray zone. Previously, the only way to get an emulator on your iPhone was through some workarounds that generally involved jailbreaking your phone, That differs from Android, which has enjoyed native emulators for years. In 2024, Apple updated its App Store guidelines to allow for emulators on its store, but with some important restrictions.

Here's the exact wording: "Apps may offer certain software that is not embedded in the binary, specifically HTML5 mini apps and mini games, streaming games, chatbots, and plug-ins. Additionally, retro game console emulator apps can offer to download games. You are responsible for all such software offered in your app, including ensuring that such software complies with these guidelines and all applicable laws. Software that does not comply with one or more guidelines will lead to the rejection of your app. You must also ensure that the software adheres to the additional rules that follow in 4.7.1 and 4.7.5. These additional rules are important to preserve the experience that App Store customers expect, and to help ensure user safety."

Read more