Skip to main content

Nintendo says account breach was even worse than it first thought

Nintendo confirmed that an additional 140,000 accounts were compromised in a Nintendo Network ID hack the company first disclosed in April.

In an updated statement on Tuesday, June 9, Nintendo said that a total of 300,000 Nintendo Network IDs were compromised, up from the 160,000 accounts it initially announced in April. Nintendo said it reset passwords on the newly discovered accounts and that it’s “taking additional security measures.” Nintendo, which added that the breach affected fewer than 1% of its Network ID users, is also sending emails to affected customers.

In April, Nintendo revealed that the 160,000 compromised accounts were ones connected to Wii U or 3DS systems and later tied to the Nintendo Switch. Those who created Nintendo Network IDs on the Switch alone were not impacted. Nintendo also said it would stop allowing Nintendo Network ID logins on the Switch to safeguard users.

And while Nintendo accounts are affected, the breach may have come from somewhere else. Nintendo said there was no evidence its own databases or servers were hacked, Eurogamer reported, meaning the login data was scraped on another platform. Nintendo’s Japanese support page also states that the data was harvested somewhere else.

The hacks are by no means unique to Nintendo. Over the years, both Sony and Microsoft have suffered data breaches that may have exposed user data.

Nintendo wasn’t able to confirm that all 300,000 accounts were actually accessed by hackers, but it reset their passwords to ensure user security. If obtained, a person’s nickname, date of birth, country/region, and email address are viewable.

While credit card information or any other sensitive data were not compromised, information like email addresses and dates of birth can be used in conjunction with other more dangerous hacks.

Nintendo all players should consider changing the passwords on both their Network IDs and Nintendo Accounts, even if they weren’t among the 300,000 compromised accounts. It also encouraged users to turn on two-factor authentication to add another layer of security.

“We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused and concern to our customers and related parties,” Nintendo said in a statement. “In the future, we will strive to further strengthen security and ensure safety so that similar events do not occur.”

Digital Trends reached out to Nintendo for additional comment, but did not receive an immediate response.

Editors' Recommendations

Don Reisinger
Don Reisinger is a freelance technology, video game, and entertainment journalist. He has been writing about the world of…
Don’t expect Zelda’s $70 price to become the new Switch standard, says Nintendo
Link looks at his hand in The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom.

The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom will be Nintendo's first Switch game to be priced at $70. News that Tears of the Kingdom, a sequel to one of the bestselling and most critically acclaimed titles on the system, will have an increased price compared to its predecessor came as a surprise over three-and-a-half years after its announcement. It also raised questions about what the future of pricing for Nintendo games will be, especially as Sony, Microsoft, and third-party publishers all upped the cost of their new games in recent years. 
While Nintendo will release Tears of Kingdom at $70, a spokesperson for the company tells Digital Trends that this will not always be the case for its first-party games going forward. 
"No," the spokesperson said when Digital Trends asked if this is a new standard. "We determine the suggested retail price for any Nintendo product on a case-by-case basis." 
The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom – Official Trailer #2
To get more insight into the price shift, I spoke to Omdia Principal Analyst George Jijiashvili, who explains what has caused the price of games to go up in recent years and how Tears of the Kingdom demonstrates that Nintendo will "remain flexible about first-party title pricing." Ultimately, Nintendo fans are finally starting to feel the impact of inflation that's been sweeping across the game industry, even if it's only "on a case-by-case basis" for now.
The price is right
Nintendo claims that not every one of its significant first-party game will be $70, and we can actually already see that in action. Preorders just went live for Pikmin 4, which launches on July 21, after Tears of the Kingdom, and it only costs $60. Still, Zelda's price tag indicates that going forward, Nintendo will at least consider raising the price of its most anticipated games to $70. But why start with Tears of the Kingdom?  
When asked why it chose Tears of the Kingdom as its first $70 Nintendo Switch game, a Nintendo spokesperson simply reiterated that the company will "determine the suggested retail price for any Nintendo product on a case-by-case basis." Still, it's a surprising choice for Nintendo to make that pricing change to just one exclusive game almost six years into the Switch's life span. Jijiashvili thinks the choice to do this with Tears of the Kingdom was a pretty apparent one for Nintendo, although it won't apply to everything going forward.
"If you are going to make a game $70, it's going to be the follow-up to one of your most critically acclaimed and bestselling games ever," Jijiashvili tells Digital Trends. "I don’t think that this means that $70 will become the standard price for all major Nintendo releases. It's worth noting that Metroid Prime Remastered is priced at $40. It's clear that Nintendo will remain flexible about first-party title pricing."

It makes basic financial sense for Nintendo to ask for a little bit more for a game it knows will be one of the biggest releases of 2023. But what factors in the game industry and world's economy at large caused Nintendo to make this decision? 
Priced Out
For more than a decade, people got comfortable with AAA video games being priced at $60. Of course, there were occasional exceptions to this rule, but it was seen as an industry standard until the dawn of the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X. Publisher 2K was one of the first to announce a price increase, and companies like EA, Sony, and Microsoft have all followed suit. Jijiashvili chalks this up to inflation-related pressure on game publishers.
"The games industry has already been experiencing a lot of inflationary pressure," he explains. "AAA games are much more expensive to make now than they used to be, but prices have actually been declining in inflation-adjusted terms -- if prices had risen with inflation since 1990, they would now be over $90. On top of that, we’ve had a big burst of general inflation, meaning that publishers are looking at big increases in everything from salaries to tools. It’s going to be really hard for most publishers to avoid passing on all those extra costs at some point."
Jijiashvili provided us with a graphic created by Omdia that "shows what the typical price points for each generation would look like if you adjusted for inflation." As you can see, the inflation-adjusted prices are only exponentially growing, and the big game pricing shifts the graph highlights were all technically not even enough to keep up with inflation when they happened. 

Read more
Call of Duty: Warzone Caldera is live, but it’s worse than we feared
Section of the Caldera map in Warzone Caldera.

After being offline for nearly two weeks, the original Call of Duty: Warzone -- now branded as Warzone Caldera -- has relaunched, but the package is far from what it used to be. This modified version of the beloved game is completely stripped down, offering access only to the Caldera map and the standard battle royale mode. This wasn't much of a surprise, as Activision previously confirmed the game would lack key features, but now that Caldera is live, it's far more disappointing than we expected. Here's what's currently missing from the battle royale game.
No Resurgence maps

The original version of Warzone is no more. Arguably Caldera's greatest flaw is the removal of the two beloved Resurgence maps: Rebirth Island and Fortune's Keep. Resurgence mode was great for those who didn't have much time to play, as matches would often only last 15 minutes or so, making it easy to get multiple matches under your belt in one session. It also allowed players to respawn, which made it possible to enjoy the game more casually. Now, this mode doesn't exist -- not even in Warzone 2.0. If you were a Resurgence player, there's nothing for you in any version of Warzone right now, which is a shame.
Only two playlists

Read more
Pokémon Violet and Scarlet are an even bigger leap forward than they seem
A pokemon terrestalizes in Pokemon Scarlet and Violet.

When I walked into my hourlong demo of Pokémon Violet and Scarlet, I wasn’t sure what to expect. I knew that developer Game Freak was serious about shaking up the franchise’s established formula after it delivered this year’s Pokémon Legends Arceus, a game that radically departed from the traditional RPG mold, but that was more of a spinoff experiment. Scarlet and Violet would be the real deal: mainline entries that would determine the true future of the series. Would we actually see a radical reinvention or would Game Freak play it safe, making another small step toward lasting change?

Jump into a Paldean Journey | Pokémon Scarlet and Pokémon Violet

Read more