Skip to main content

Sega and Gearbox Software stand by studio’s work on Aliens: Colonial Marines amid critical drubbing

Aliens-Colonial-Marines
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The critical consensus is that Aliens: Colonial Marines is not a good game. Some might say it is downright bad. Digital Trends’ Adam Rosenberg said that the game is “an insult to fans of the franchise,” and those fans are accustomed to abuse after the past 20 years. Within a day of the game’s release, myriad parties involved with the game’s production are attempting to explain what happened during the game’s prolonged development. People claiming to be former team members from Gearbox Software say that the fault lies with another studio entirely. Sega, meanwhile, has pointed its finger at Gearbox instead.

Back in May, approximately when Sega began offering the press chances to play Aliens’ multiplayer modes in the lead up to E3, the alleged former Gearbox employee took to the Web to explain why no single player demo was offered. “Gearbox isn’t even making the game, except for the multiplayer,” said the developer, “Primary development was outsourced to TimeGate Studios, which has a less than stellar past. I hope it proves me wrong, as I still have a lot of friends working at Gearbox, but I am expecting it to be average at best.”

TimeGate’s reputation is by no means poor. Its last major release, first-person shooter Section 8, received moderate reviews when it released in 2009. The critical consensus surrounding that game echoed the unnamed Gearbox developer’s hopes for Aliens: An average shooter.

Gearbox’s president Randy Pitchford, meanwhile, insists that TimeGate only did a modicum of work on Aliens. Speaking with IGN at the DICE Summit, Pitchford said that TimeGate was only working on the game for “about 20 or 25 percent of the total time” and that “their effort is probably equivalent to ours.”

Publisher Sega is not as eager to spread blame equally. Sega producer Matthew Powers told news outlet Playnews (via Dark Side Of Gaming) that TimeGate and other studios like Demiurge (who helped develop the multiplayer modes and is producing the Wii U version of the game) only offered basic assistance. When asked if Gearbox was in fact only responsible for multiplayer, Powers replied, “Absolutely not, the game has been developed by Gearbox Software. Other studios helped Gearbox on the production of single and multiplayer.”

After Borderlands 2’s success—Take-Two said it’s now its bestselling game ever—Gearbox’s position in the industry is secure. Two out of its last three shipped games, though, have been critical disasters. Aliens may prove a commercial hit yet, but it could cause the studio trouble down the road.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Anthony John Agnello
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Anthony John Agnello is a writer living in New York. He works as the Community Manager of Joystiq.com and his writing has…
The Nintendo Switch just got 2 surprise games — and they’re both worth grabbing
A teddy beat sits on an embroidery hoop in Stitch.

If you were unable to catch this week's Nintendo IndieWorld showcase, then you missed a surprisingly loaded show. Lorelei and the Laser Eyes got a May release date, WayForward showed off its Yars' Revenge revival, and Steamworld Heist 2 got an exciting reveal. In the midst of all those headlines, two smaller games were surprise released on the platform: Stitch and Sticky Business. Don't sleep on either of them, as they're both worth a purchase.

Both games are ports of previously released games, but both went a bit under the radar upon their original launch. Sticky Business modestly launched last summer on PC, whereas Stitch has actually been around since 2022 as an Apple Arcade exclusive. The latter even has an Apple Vision Pro version now that can be played in mixed reality. I can't blame anyone for missing either, but their Switch releases offer a good opportunity to catch up with some quiet hidden gems.

Read more
Is this Razer’s Steam Deck killer?
The Razer Kishi Ultra sitting on a table.

Razer has been oddly quiet in the burgeoning world of handheld gaming PCs. When I met up with the company at the Game Developers Conference (GDC) to learn about its new products, I was happy to hear it had an answer to the success of the Steam Deck.

But it was not the type of answer I was expecting.

Read more
The best iPhone emulators
A collage of the delta emulator.

The market for iPhone games has become so wide and diverse that it can realistically compete with most console and PC offerings. Where we once only got cheap time-wasters, we now have complete experiences that don't feel any less impressive than what the competition offers. In fact, a lot of games made for consoles are appearing on the iPhone now that it is becoming so powerful. However, older games have paradoxically been mostly absent from the app store. That all could be about to change as emulation is now allowed on iPhone, though with some caveats that any retro fan should know about before getting too excited to play all your favorite NES games on your phone. Here's what's up with iPhone emulators, as well as our picks for a few of the best ones you can get right now.
What you need to know about emulation on iPhone
Emulators on iPhone, as well as emulation in general, are in a strange legal gray zone. Previously, the only way to get an emulator on your iPhone was through some workarounds that generally involved jailbreaking your phone, That differs from Android, which has enjoyed native emulators for years. In 2024, Apple updated its App Store guidelines to allow for emulators on its store, but with some important restrictions.

Here's the exact wording: "Apps may offer certain software that is not embedded in the binary, specifically HTML5 mini apps and mini games, streaming games, chatbots, and plug-ins. Additionally, retro game console emulator apps can offer to download games. You are responsible for all such software offered in your app, including ensuring that such software complies with these guidelines and all applicable laws. Software that does not comply with one or more guidelines will lead to the rejection of your app. You must also ensure that the software adheres to the additional rules that follow in 4.7.1 and 4.7.5. These additional rules are important to preserve the experience that App Store customers expect, and to help ensure user safety."

Read more