Skip to main content

The history of aviation unfolds one victory at a time in ‘World of Warplanes’

the history of aviation unfolds one victory at a time in world warplanes wowarplanes

One consistent (and often unfair) argument against free-to-play games is that they lack depth. You are given a simple objective – usually something along the lines of see the enemy, kill the enemy – and then you repeat. You typically spend time leveling up and collecting new items, but there is rarely anything like a story to immerse yourself in. Wargaming’s follow-up to World of Tanks, the upcoming World of Warplanes, does not offer a story. But it does offer a journey.

Vlad Belozerov, Director of Global Operation for World of Warplanes
Vlad Belozerov, Director of Global Operation for World of Warplanes

The game is more than just a flight combat sim; it is a tour through the history of aviation. Specifically the so-called “golden age of dogfighting.” The aircraft you pilot cover a stretch of time between the last bi-planes of the 1930s through the first jets introduced during the Korean War at the beginning of the 1950s. 

Related Videos

“The specific tactics that you have to adopt to be successful in these airplanes are also derived from real life,” Vlad Belozerov, director of global operations for World of Warplanes, told Digital Trends. That’s not just an idle comment; your choice of plane influences the way you fly, in turn requiring you to learn the tricks of the era.

Before advances in aviation changed the way aerial wars are waged, victory was a matter of finding the right balance. Sure, you wanted the best plane available – a crop duster would leak oil in terror at the mere thought of being chased by a P-51 Mustang – but you needed a multi-role complement of fighters in order to win skirmishes. That remains true on World of Warplanes‘ digital front.

“It’s like rock, paper, scissors,” Belozerov said. “You have to combine different types of planes in a flying formation, for example, to be successful.”

World-of-Warplanes-US-Carrier-Based-Aircraft-Teaser_10The game is designed around dogfighting, and the sessions end when one team is completely destroyed. There are alternate goals though, and destroying AI-controlled targets can earn you and your team a lot of points to be spent on upgrades and new planes. The best scores are awarded to the teams that not only defeat their opponents, but also mix in things like destroying carriers, battleships, and other ground targets. To do that you need to balance out your squad.

“Everything is obviously based on historical data.”

The game features four classes of planes pulled from history: Assault Fighters, light and agile craft with low armor or hit points; Heavy Assault Fighters, fast planes with high firepower that are best used in high altitude but have poor maneuverability; Ground Attack Aircraft, specifically designed to destroy ground targets with guns and rockets; and Carrier Aircraft, which offer better maneuverability and a balance between dogfighting and ground assault, but are less powerful than true assault planes.

“Everything is obviously based on historical data. We have lots of historical consultants who are working on the project,” Belozerov said.

There will be over 100 planes at launch, with more planned for release after that. Once you get into the modifications, that number explodes. Each plane can be upgraded, from the weapons to the engines to the aesthetics. When you first start, you are in tier 1 (the lowest of 10 levels) and have to work your way up. The tier system serves as a tutorial to start with, later opening up into the expected progression system.  As you advance, each new tier serves to give you a quick tour through the history of aviation. 


Aviation technology changed both rapidly and often in the 20 year period between the 1930s and 1950s. During World War I, airplanes were mainly support vehicles, best used for scouting. Bombing runs required pilots to physically throw the explosives out of their cockpits, and while there were no real anti-aircraft weapons, the relatively slow speeds made these aircraft targets for anyone with a rifle and good aim. By the end of the war, however, it was obvious to most military minds that aerial combat was the future.

“Our goal is to educate that to the players.”

The aviation industry expanded in the decade that followed, with much of it stemming from surplus WWI parts and technology. By the start of the ’30s, the public was enthralled by airplanes. Air races were big business, and both pilots and their planes became national heroes after setting new speed and distance records. The technology was improving rapidly to meet the demand, but leapt forward yet again when World War II began. Dozens of models of aircraft were created, all with different forms and functions. In 1932 most planes were barely breaking 200 mph. Just 15 years later, Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier in the Bell X-1.

“Our aircraft are based either on planes that were mass produced and are well known, or some prototypes that were probably done as one example or something like that,” Belozerov told us. “Some were done just on paper, but we don’t have any imaginary planes that we invented.”

World of Warplanes

World of Warplanes takes you through the steps separating these events, starting you with lowly bi-planes, then introducing you to faster racing-era planes. From there you are given the chance to try out the early WWII planes and you can watch as the technology that created the famous Messerschmitt is surpassed by the Corsair, and eventually jets.

“As you progress through tiers, up to tier 10 … more and more you will have to know about tactics to the dogfight. Our goal is to educate that to the players,” Belozerov told us.

To succeed in World of Warplanes, you need to learn about the history of the planes and the tactics those planes used in real life. Understanding that your fighter is more responsive at higher altitudes than your opponent’s, or recognizing the difference in maneuverability between planes makes a huge difference.

Mastering the game is meant to be difficult, but there’s a gradual progression. Like most games of this sort, the bar for experience required to level up and jump into new tiers is set low at first, and then becomes increasingly higher. It will take weeks or months of consistent play to reach the top rankings. By the time you reach the tenth tier, you will have experienced a significant chunk of aviation’s formative years.

“As you move to tier 10, it will become more and more about understanding tactics, about finesse. It will be much more demanding,” Belozerov said, adding, “But players will become much more skillful [along the way], so it is a journey.”

Editors' Recommendations

One year later, New World’s never-ending MMO grind is just fine
Character using lightning in New World.

It hardly feels like much time has passed between now and last October when I dropped over 170 hours of my life into a new pirate-themed MMORPG with a suspiciously colonial-inspired backdrop. When it was still relatively new (pun intended), Amazon Games Studios’ New World promised to be a whole bunch of things that a “modern” MMORPG like Final Fantasy 14 or World of Warcraft usually isn’t. It combined gameplay loops often seen in survival sandboxes -- for example, foraging herbs and crafting your own potions -- with a perpetual PVP battleground that determined the quality of life for all players on a server. It also promised many “old school” sensibilities like minimal fast travel and punishing combat where simple trips across the map were both expensive and treacherous.

Granted, New World really struggled to make any of these individual systems work well, and very little of the game was that much fun to play. Its combat system was thoroughly limited and repetitive, with very little changing between levels one through 60. What made the experience enjoyable was also often what made it feel so disjointed -- namely, the player-vs.-player contest for the map, which influenced elements as basic as how much it would cost to repair gear after a battle. Some people really love that sort of bare-bones, down-to-the-wire experience, but frankly, I couldn’t get past how unintuitive it felt. I walked away from New World feeling like it was mostly just OK -- a decent experiment with some pretty cool ideas that ultimately succumbed to its own emphasis on grind.

Read more
Marvel World of Heroes is the next AR game from Pokémon Go studio
marvel world of heroes announcement niantic

A new augmented reality game from Niantic is on the way, and this time it's being created in partnership with Marvel and will feature plenty of iconic faces from the comics. The game was announced today during Disney & Marvel's games showcase and has a 2023 release window.

MARVEL World of Heroes | Announcement Teaser

Read more
I don’t need Starfield because I have The Outer Worlds
The spacer looks out over a vast horizon in The Outer Worlds 2 key art.

Starfield will be one of the biggest games of 2023, but I'm not that excited to play it yet.
While  Starfield's spotlight at the Xbox & Bethesda Games Showcase this year highlighted some impressive features, I couldn't shake the feeling that I'd already gotten everything I'd want from a traditional sci-fi RPG like this from another game: The Outer Worlds from Obsidian Entertainment. Ironically developed by another Microsoft-owned studio, The Outer Worlds showed that bloating up a sci-fi game with thousands of planets isn't necessary when a "less is more" mentality can still result in an expertly designed sci-fi RPG. 
Although The Outer Worlds might not be as nearly as grand as Starfield in scope, it still leaves an impression every time I revisit it. It's a focused, replayable, and hilarious adventure without much bloat, which is what I want from my RPGs. It does this while emulating Bethesda's classic The Elder Scrolls and Fallout games too, beating Starfield to the punch.
Starfield could impress me when it launches, but what I've seen of it hasn't got me that eager to play it when I'm so content with replaying The Outer Worlds while avidly waiting for its sequel.
Starfield: Official Gameplay Reveal
Fewer worlds, more fun
From the moment your escape pod accidentally lands on a bounty hunter that's supposed to help you, it's clear that The Outer Worlds is a tongue-in-cheek, satirical take on capitalism, colonization, and the sci-fi genre as a whole. While Bethesda Game Studios' narratives have their fair share of humor, much of its writing tends to be more serious and dryly written. We haven't seen enough of Starfield's dialogue or narrative to get a sense of its thematic identity yet.
Starfield's narrative could be more playful than we've seen so far, but the game's massive scope is what really worries me. During the Microsoft showcase, Todd Howard boasted that there are over 1,000 planets to explore. Because Starfield is so huge, I worry that it risks feeling unfocused. Will I get bored on planets that aren't very handcrafted and don't have as much to do? It's the same potential issue that infamously plagued No Man's Sky at launch.
Meanwhile, The Outer Worlds and its upcoming sequel are intentionally designed to avoid those bloat issues, according to former Obsidian Entertainment Narrative Designer Nitai Poddar in a 2019 Game Informer interview. "There is a lot of value in having an open-ended game that is still structured around individual discreet levels," he said. "It also tends to be easier to develop, and I'm always a fan of making the most of a budget that you have."

The Outer Worlds' developers didn't have a huge budget, and kept the game small but very tightly designed as a result. You might not be able to explore entire planets or fly between them, but you'll definitely remember what you did on every single one you visited. This smaller scope allowed the studio to make the world more reactive to each dialogue choice and player decision.
Playing a combat-focused build in The Outer Worlds gives you an entirely different experience than a dialogue-driven playthrough. You can also murder or scorn everyone you meet in The Outer Worlds, and the game accounts for it in tangible, narrative ways. This makes The Outer Worlds a great sci-fi roleplaying experience, and I'm hopeful its sequel will be too. I'm not as hungry for a sci-fi RPG on such a potentially problematic large scale anymore when The Outer Worlds and its handcrafted worlds and narratives are so enjoyable moment-to-moment, just like classic Bethesda games. 
Where both games will boldly go
As far as sci-fi experiences go, Starfield can stand out from The Outer Worlds with its combat, base-building and shipbuilding, and space combat. But when it comes to the core tenets of Bethesda's best RPGs -- compelling characters, well-written narratives, and lots of reactive and choice-driven moments -- The Outer Worlds beat Starfield to the punch without any additional fat. I already have the Bethesda-like sci-fi experience I always wanted.

Read more