Skip to main content

The Xbox Series X is the wrong console for a climate crisis

Microsoft’s Xbox Series X is coming in 2020 and, as you’ve likely heard, it looks like a minifridge. Its strange vertical design left gamers scratching their heads, but there’s a method behind the madness. The new Xbox looks different because its hardware is far more powerful than anything we’ve seen before.

Analysis by Eurogamer’s Digital Foundry suggests the Xbox Series X will pack between 9 and 12 teraflops of raw computing power, as much as double the Xbox One X’s six teraflops. Some of that gain will come from newer, more modern hardware, but that alone won’t be enough. Digital Foundry believes Microsoft will have to increase total system power draw beyond 300 watts. More power means more heat, and a larger box is one way to handle that heat.

Xbox Series X
The Xbox Series X is big for a reason. Microsoft

That’s good news for graphical fidelity. Yet there may be a significant, troubling consequence: An increase in gaming’s contribution to climate change. Gamers have enjoyed the luxury of ignoring this issue so far, but a significant increase in power draw from next-gen console hardware could increase gaming’s carbon footprint when exactly the opposite is needed.

Is it really a problem?

You might not think your console contributes much to climate change. Game consoles don’t produce any obvious pollution, and while some end up in dumps, many are resold. Power consumption isn’t frequently discussed by console manufacturers and consoles don’t carry the bright yellow Energy Guide labels you’ll find on an oven, refrigerator, or dryer.

A recent study in The Computer Games Journal found that U.S. gamers are responsible for as much carbon dioxide as 5 million cars annually. While that’s obviously less than the transportation industry, it puts gaming ahead of all the nation’s freezers, cooking devices, washers, or dishwashers. The study also found consoles contributed 66% of gaming’s total carbon output, easily outpacing PC desktops, PC laptops, and media streaming devices.

So, yes. Gaming’s carbon footprint is a problem. It’s not causing the climate crisis alone, but it contributes. A game console’s power must come from somewhere. In most parts of the world, that somewhere is a power plant that emits greenhouse gases.

300 is a lot of watts

There’s a direct correlation between power consumption and carbon footprint. That’s why the Xbox Series X is worrying.

Assuming Digital Foundry’s guess is right, the Xbox Series X will consume significantly more power than even the Xbox One X, which is already the most power-hungry console.

Xbox One X review logo
The Xbox One X is this generation’s most power-hungry console. Les Shu/Digital Trends

How much more is hard to say for sure, since it depends on both final Series X hardware and how you measure. A conservative estimate would pit that predicted 300-watt consumption against the 245-watt rated maximum of the Xbox One X, which puts the increase at 22%. A less charitable comparison would place that 300-watt estimate against the typical actual power consumption of the Xbox One X in real-world use, which is about 180-watt under heavy load. In that case, the Series X increases consumption by 67%.

Both results are disappointing. Climate change can only be stopped by a significant decrease in carbon output, and that’s not going to happen if everyday items like game consoles go in the wrong direction. The 300-watt figure will put the Xbox Series X ahead of many refrigerators, and it’d be a new high-water mark for console power consumption.

Power from your pockets

If you’re not worried about what the Xbox Series X means for climate change, you might be worried about what it means for your wallet.

Early consoles didn’t use enough power to put a dent in your power bill. The PlayStation 2, original Xbox, and GameCube all consumed between 30 and 50 watts while playing games. At 12 cents per kilowatt, the average price for power in the United States, you’d have to play 6 hours every day to add more than a dollar to your monthly power bill.

Play that much on an Xbox Series X, however, and you’ll pay $6.48 a month. That adds up to almost 80 dollars a year.

Six hours is a lot of playing time, of course, but cut that down to a more sensible 2 hours each day and you’ll still pay about $26 every year. That’s an extra $156 dollars added to the console’s price if you use it for six years.

Causing a crisis for no good reason?

Consoles like the Xbox Series X may well push the carbon footprint of gaming in the wrong direction. And here’s the worst part. Games may not be “better.”

Will they look better? Sure. But that doesn’t mean they’ll be more fun. Many of the world’s most popular games aren’t all that demanding or, at least, don’t need to be. League of Legends. Destiny 2. Overwatch. All these are sharp as a tack at 4K and 60FPS, but they’re just as fun at 1080p with a few details dialed back.

Sony and Microsoft make lofty promises about their environmental commitments. If they’re truly concerned about the climate crisis, however, fighting over 8K resolution and 120 FPS is the wrong move. Gaming needs real innovation, and that innovation is possible without making the climate crisis worse.

Editors' Recommendations

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
The best PS5 controller is finally getting an Xbox variant
A front-and-back image of Victrix's Xbox Pro BFG controller.

Victrix announced that an Xbox-compatible version of its Pro BFG controller will hit store shelves in 2024, giving owners of Microsoft's consoles the opportunity to use a version of one of the best third-party PlayStation 5 controllers.

The Victrix Pro BFG stands out from other third-party controllers due to its modular setup. Players can move around the sticks to be offset or level with each other, and it even features a Fight Pad module that makes playing fighting games like Street Fighter 6 a bit more comfortable. Victrix also plans to release new Hall Effect Stick Modules for both the PS5 and Xbox versions of the controller starting in February.

Read more
For Microsoft, indies aren’t Game Pass extras. They’re the future of Xbox
A list of indie games on Xbox appears in a grid.

Xbox may be about as corporate a brand as you can find, but it’s been a surprisingly vital platform for independent developers. That dates back to the Xbox Live Arcade days of old, when small developers were given a place to easily publish their projects on consoles. Rather than pulling away from those days, Xbox has only doubled down on its relationship to indies in the years since through initiatives like ID@Xbox and a Developer Acceleration Program designed to help underrepresented developers get their games out.

Over the past few months, the brand has been on a global tour to reach small developers directly and court them to Xbox. That effort would take the company to New York City on November 18, where Xbox leadership would speak to local developers and students about how to submit to their programs (the event would also feature a questionably timed speech from New York City Mayor Eric Adams amid an FBI investigation into his campaign funds). It’s clear that Microsoft is investing a lot of time and money into signing deals with small developers, but why make the effort when it could comfortably thrive just by publishing major titles through acquired publishers like Activision Blizzard and Bethesda?

Read more
Xbox’s 2023 games feel like the Series X launch lineup we never got
EMBARGO 10/4 12:01 AM PT: A camera angle up close to a Forza Motorsport race.

Even though we’re almost three years into the life span of the Xbox Series X and Xbox Series S, it feels like this console generation is just starting for Microsoft.
It’s no secret that Xbox was slow to start up and then maintain consistency this console generation. For example, 2020 saw the company putting out a weak console launch lineup made up of ports and remasters. While 2021 had a flurry of great games, it was followed by a comparatively barren 2022. And 2023 hasn't been perfect either (due, in large part, to the flop that is Redfall), but outside of that, this year delivered the excellent Hi-Fi Rush, the grandly scaled Starfield, solid ports of two Age of Empires games and Quake II, a new Minecraft title, and a technical showpiece in Forza Motorsport.
Looking at that varied lineup, these games showcase both the potential of the Series X and the power of Xbox as a brand. Prospects for Xbox’s lineup are up heading into 2024 too, so it feels like we’re at the proper start of the Xbox Series X and S console generation ... even if it came a few years too late.
A new beginning 
Looking at the 2020 launch lineup for Xbox Series X/S, it wasn’t exactly emblematic of what the console could do. While there were some nice 4K and 60 frames per second (fps) upgrades for Xbox One games, the only new draws were a console port of Gears Tactics, the multiplayer-supporting Tetris Effect: Connected, a temporary next-gen exclusive version of Yakuza: Like a Dragon, and some smaller indies like The Falconeer and Bright Memory 1.0.

Most of those games were on or came to more platforms afterward and, in general, didn’t provide that strong of an argument for why players should stick around this console generation. But looking at many of the games Xbox has released this year, it finally feels like we have a bundle of good Xbox exclusives that show what the platform was always capable of.
In my review of Forza Motorsport, I note that the game feels like a launch title because it’s an impressive technical showpiece. It runs at 4K and 60 fps in performance mode, which is something not many games this generation have done. The closest comparable games are Astro’s Playroom and Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered on PlayStation 5, which effectively demonstrated the power of Sony's console early on.
Forza Motorsport was also built as a platform that developer Turn 10 Studios can expand over time. It plans to periodically slot in new single and multiplayer content, including new cars and tracks. A game like that makes a lot of sense early on in a console’s life span in this live-service era. It’s what Microsoft tried to do with Halo Infinite, even if that didn’t pan out as expected due to a one-year delay, and with Killer Instinct on Xbox One.

Read more