Skip to main content

This looks like a job for Superman: Justice League movie hinges on Man of Steel’s success

Man of Steel
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Look! Up in the sky! It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s Warner Bros.’ only hope to compete with Marvel Studios in the realm of big budget blockbuster superhero flicks!

Variety recently published an article which profiles Jeff Rubinov, the president of the Warner Bros. picture group. Ostensibly it’s a detailed examination of the hurdles Rubinov faces as head of such a major studio, but for our purposes the important bits all center on Warner Bros.’ burgeoning slate of films based on properties and characters initially created by DC Comics. Though WB recently struck gold with Christopher Nolan’s three Batman films, the studio has long had trouble in trying to exploit its access to DC’s characters. That could change in the near future, as Warner Bros. is now swiping cues directly from the wildly successful Marvel Studios. To counter Marvel’s The Avengers – a film which has pulled in more than $1.51 billion since its debut last summer – Warner Bros. hopes to release a superhero team film of its own based on DC’s Justice League, but before it can realize those plans there’s one major hurdle to jump over.

Fortunately, Warner Bros. happens to know a guy capable of leaping tall buildings in a single bound.

Superman, the world’s most famous superhero has seen the silver screen treatment a number of times, not to mention plenty of TV outings, yet never before has so much pressure been laid on the Kryptonian’s shoulders. If the upcoming Man of Steel (slated for release on June 14) doesn’t perform as well as Warner Bros.’ executives are hoping, the Justice League movie may never get off the ground. Burned by the abysmal Green Lantern staring Ryan Reynolds, and with a looming budget for the Justice League film in the hundreds of millions, not to mention the dozens of DC properties ripe for big screen success if it all works out, WB is being cautious. Before moving ahead, WB will want to see solid results from Man of Steel. And not just good numbers, but great.

Well that shouldn’t be too much of an issue, you may think to yourself smugly. After all, this is Superman we’re talking about. He’s invincible, endlessly strong, and people the world over know him as the face of superheroes. Superman is a very popular hero. However, his box office track record is less than golden. 2006’s Superman Returns was widely slammed by critics, and while it earned a respectable $391 million worldwide, that’s barely more than a drop in the bucket compared to the blockbuster comic book films coming from Marvel Studios. X-Men: First Class, by contrast, featured characters that were largely unknown to the average person and nowhere near the promotional budget of Superman Returns, yet critics loved it and the film has accrued over $353 million since its debut last year. Given that it was filmed on a $160 million budget (compared to the $270 million spent on Superman Returns), you can see why the WB would want to ape Marvel Studios.

So it all comes down to director Zack Snyder, whose last three films – the adaption of the classic comic series Watchmen, the animated Legends of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga’Hoole, and Sucker Punch, which Snyder co-wrote, produced, and directed- were all only slightly profitable, and all three received mixed to negative reviews. And now the future of the DC universe is in his hands. At least for the next few years until someone at WB decides to try again with another reboot.

Editors' Recommendations

Earnest Cavalli
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Earnest Cavalli has been writing about games, tech and digital culture since 2005 for outlets including Wired, Joystiq…
The Nintendo Switch just got 2 surprise games — and they’re both worth grabbing
A teddy beat sits on an embroidery hoop in Stitch.

If you were unable to catch this week's Nintendo IndieWorld showcase, then you missed a surprisingly loaded show. Lorelei and the Laser Eyes got a May release date, WayForward showed off its Yars' Revenge revival, and Steamworld Heist 2 got an exciting reveal. In the midst of all those headlines, two smaller games were surprise released on the platform: Stitch and Sticky Business. Don't sleep on either of them, as they're both worth a purchase.

Both games are ports of previously released games, but both went a bit under the radar upon their original launch. Sticky Business modestly launched last summer on PC, whereas Stitch has actually been around since 2022 as an Apple Arcade exclusive. The latter even has an Apple Vision Pro version now that can be played in mixed reality. I can't blame anyone for missing either, but their Switch releases offer a good opportunity to catch up with some quiet hidden gems.

Read more
Is this Razer’s Steam Deck killer?
The Razer Kishi Ultra sitting on a table.

Razer has been oddly quiet in the burgeoning world of handheld gaming PCs. When I met up with the company at the Game Developers Conference (GDC) to learn about its new products, I was happy to hear it had an answer to the success of the Steam Deck.

But it was not the type of answer I was expecting.

Read more
The best iPhone emulators
A collage of the delta emulator.

The market for iPhone games has become so wide and diverse that it can realistically compete with most console and PC offerings. Where we once only got cheap time-wasters, we now have complete experiences that don't feel any less impressive than what the competition offers. In fact, a lot of games made for consoles are appearing on the iPhone now that it is becoming so powerful. However, older games have paradoxically been mostly absent from the app store. That all could be about to change as emulation is now allowed on iPhone, though with some caveats that any retro fan should know about before getting too excited to play all your favorite NES games on your phone. Here's what's up with iPhone emulators, as well as our picks for a few of the best ones you can get right now.
What you need to know about emulation on iPhone
Emulators on iPhone, as well as emulation in general, are in a strange legal gray zone. Previously, the only way to get an emulator on your iPhone was through some workarounds that generally involved jailbreaking your phone, That differs from Android, which has enjoyed native emulators for years. In 2024, Apple updated its App Store guidelines to allow for emulators on its store, but with some important restrictions.

Here's the exact wording: "Apps may offer certain software that is not embedded in the binary, specifically HTML5 mini apps and mini games, streaming games, chatbots, and plug-ins. Additionally, retro game console emulator apps can offer to download games. You are responsible for all such software offered in your app, including ensuring that such software complies with these guidelines and all applicable laws. Software that does not comply with one or more guidelines will lead to the rejection of your app. You must also ensure that the software adheres to the additional rules that follow in 4.7.1 and 4.7.5. These additional rules are important to preserve the experience that App Store customers expect, and to help ensure user safety."

Read more