Skip to main content

Valve’s massive Dota2 tournament prize is hot, but leaves many competitors in the cold

As difficult as making games can be, founding an eSport is even harder. The game must be enjoyable, yet offer enough depth to its skill-based gameplay to make room for high-level competition.

And it’s not enough for the game to be fun for players. A good eSport needs to be a fun to watch, as well. That’s something even industry giants like Blizzard have struggled with. Even when it sat on a goldmine of a competitive eSport – Starcraft: Broodwar – its disinterest in fostering the scene led to it instead spending years pushing World of Warcraft as a competitive platform. And it’s just not much fun to watch.

Given the challenges, it’s no wonder that Valve has invested more than just time into its current flagship title, Dota 2. It’s been prompted heavily in Steam, it gave gamers the first taste of the long-awaited Source 2 engine and, most notably, Valve has thrown hoards of cash at the game’s tournaments in an attempt to attract high-profile players and teams.

King of the prize pools

Last year’s Dota 2 International prize pool was almost $11 million. This year, it’s already eclipsed $17 million (at the time of writing), and shows no sign that it will stop growing. To put that in perspective, League of Legends, the world’s most popular eSport, has an annual prize pool of just $2 million for its World Championships.

It’s not just the world’s biggest tournaments that attracts a lot of Dota 2 money though. Throughout the game’s short, but storied career, it’s allowed just over 1,100 players to earn $31 million, across 430 tournaments. League of Legends, on the other hand, has paid out $21 million, to over 3,200 players, across 1,465 tournaments, as per

This year’s International tournament prize pool exceeds 17 million dollars.

Part of the reason that fewer people may have walked away with enough money to pay rent from Dota 2, is the way Valve structures payouts. Although all games operate in a pyramid structure, where the winners take home a substantially larger portion of the purse than those lower down, Dota 2’s tournaments, specifically The International, taper off much more quickly than others.

League of Legends’ developer, Riot, gives almost everyone that takes part in high-level competitive play a fair payout, regardless of placement. On top of that, it pays teams classed at the professional level a salary of $12,500 each per season-split, though that is based on the idea that they start every game.

That’s hardly a living wage, and the gamers will certainly be looking to augment it with streaming, sponsorship and, if all goes well, tournament prize money. But it provides a baseline level of funding that keeps the player pool fresh.

Comparatively, League of Legends 2014 World Championship winner Samsung White, took only 'only' 0,000 each.
Comparatively, League of Legends 2014 World Championship winners, Samsung White, took home ‘only’ $200,000 each. Valve

While Valve doesn’t have a salary system of its own, neither do any of the other major eSports, League of Legends excluded. Riot’s salary system is unique. When we asked Team Acer’s Will Judd why he thought that was, he said it’s down to the differing business strategies at the two developers.

“Riot intends to make a whole sports franchise out of LoL, where it owns everything — all the tournaments, all the teams, all the players, all the managers and coaches — whereas Valve is more open, offering one marquee tournament and otherwise concentrating its efforts on the game itself.”

That may be the case for the structure of the tournaments and the games themselves, but when it comes to the prizes it gives out, Valve is in the business of making millionaires. It makes a nice headline, after all. Dota 2 has been covered as much for the cash sums attached to it as the game itself. Having the biggest prize pool in the world is big news.

Does money bring in players?

But does a massive prize pool really bring in players? Or does it instead encourage the dominance of a few, elite teams?

To find out, we asked one of the world’s highest paid, and most well known professional eSports players — Johnathan “Fatal1ty” Wendel. He took a moment out of promoting his new line of Monster-branded gaming products to speak to us about the cash-focused side of eSports play.

When we asked him if the money Valve was offering would be a draw for pro-players, he said it was hard to think otherwise.

Johnathan “Fatal1ty” Wendel
Fatal1ty was perhaps the first truly recognizable pro gamer, earning excellent money for his time. Glenn Francis,

“As a professional gamer, you can’t be picky on what game you want to play — if you want to truly be a professional,” he said. “For me personally, I went wherever to compete in the biggest tournaments and to win the most prize money possible.”

Although there are endless differences between games like LoL and Dota 2, perhaps they are close enough in genre that these big prizes will see better players move over, or at least tempt them when they’re are first starting out.

Indeed John’s own career saw companies trying to draw in the best players with big money. Back in 2005, the Cyberathlete Professional League (CPL) chose Painkiller as its official World Tour Game, despite the fact games like Quake III Arena and Counter-Strike were more popular.

Painkiller was chosen over more popular contenders because the developers fronted the prize money. John was a big fan of the game and was understandably happy to walk away with the grand prize of $150,000.

Valve is a scientist looking at a petri dish.

But not everyone agrees with Fatal1ty’s assessment. Richard Lewis, an eSports journalist, sees no evidence to suggest players move between (these two specific games at least) for money or any other reason. “While there are some similarities, they are too fundamentally different,” he said of League of Legends and Dota 2.

The same goes for the way that the games are managed. He echoed Judd’s sentiments about the management styles of the different market leaders, but suggested it wasn’t so much about Valve’s corporate structure that dictated its actions, but its approach to building communities.

“Valve is a scientist looking at a petri dish,” he said. “It likes to drop its essence, its primordial ooze into a test tube and then just take a step back and watch what comes out of it. It’s a hands off approach, that while frustrating when you want something specific fixed, empowers gaming communities to build themselves up and Dota 2 is a great example of that.”

Making eSports profitable

Valve’s money making approach is different than most companies, as well. It profits directly from the International tournament thanks to sales of its digital tournament booklet, known as the Compendium, of which it takes 75 percent. The other 25 percent aids the crowd-funding efforts for the tournament’s prize pool. Riot does things very differently, and may have a different stance on eSports because of it.

Dota 2
The International 2014 winners Newbee celebrate after taking the top prize of over $5 million. Dota 2 The International/Flickr

“The whole League of Legends Championship Series system is a loss leader,” Lewis said. “It creates this aspirational element and that makes players interested, but it doesn’t make Riot any money directly.”

It could. With a much larger community of players than Dota 2, League of Legends could have its own enormous crowd-funded prize pool if it wanted. When we asked Lewis why he thought that didn’t, he was somewhat unsure.

“If I had to guess,” he said, “it’s because if you use crowd funded money, you have to have a higher standard of product.”

Many gamers make next to nothing for the hours they put in to becoming the best players in the world

Some companies other than Valve are happy to take the risk, however. Hi-Rez, developer of Smite, launched the most successful initial prize pool of any game ever when it generated $2 million through crowd funding in its first year of release. While it is partially backed by Chinese investment firm Tencent, its not as financially solvent as Valve is, so crowd-funding was the only way for Hi-Rez to gather the money.

Valve, on the other hand, has no need to rely on crowd-funding. It could pay for a huge tournament prize all by itself, like Riot does, but it doesn’t want to. Perhaps it doesn’t want to be the overlord of Dota 2. It just wants to give the game an initial shove — and let the the community handle things from there.

It should be about the players

There’s a valid argument that The International is too big, in that it overshadows other tournaments throughout the year. Perhaps that will lessen as Valve introduces more of its own smaller competitions. That is something that Fatal1ty would certainly like to see.

Not only can people buy Compendiums, but they can pay to 'level' them up too.
Not only can people buy Compendiums, but they can pay to ‘level’ them up too. Valve

“I would prefer to see more security for today’s players.  I feel it is a real hustle to be a professional gamer in general,” he said.

A lot of gamers still make next to nothing for the sizeable hours they put in to being some of the best players in the world. Their careers shouldn’t hinge on the result of a single, annual tournament. Millionaire eSport athletes make for good headlines, but they don’t necessarily make for a well balanced, sustainable community.

Hopefully, Valve will learn to spread the wealth, but it’s hard to say for sure given the company’s characteristic silence about future plans. In the meantime, we’ll just need to keep watching streams and support our favorite players. Big payouts turn tournaments into lotteries, leaving professional gamers even more dependent on the support of fans.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is the Evergreen Coordinator for Computing, overseeing a team of writers addressing all the latest how to…
How I fixed the most annoying part of PC gaming
solving pc gamings launcher problem launchers featured 1

There are far too many launchers for PC gaming. Even with various failed attempted from game publishers, such as the Bethesda launcher, we have more storefronts, libraries, and third-party apps than ever on PC, all of them gunning to capture just a little bit of the magic Valve bottled up with Steam back in the early 2000s.

I'm sick of them, and I'm sure you are too. You can't uninstall all of your launchers if you want to play games you have on various storefronts, but you can unify your library in a single spot and minimize how much the various different launchers on PC pester you. Here's how I did it.
My preferred method: Steam

Read more
Warframe: 1999 is the Y2K dating sim I didn’t know I needed
Arthur from warframe clashes swords with the excalibur frame.

After over a decade, Warframe continues to grow, evolve, and reinvent itself. The third-person shooter/RPG hybrid has thrived as a free-to-play game thanks to steady updates expanding the story, systems, and weapons. With the upcoming release of Warframe: 1999, Digital Extremes looks to conquer some completely unexpected things: Y2K, chat rooms, and boy bands.

As Rebecca Ford, creative director for Warframe, tells Digital Trends at this year's Tennocon, “The Journey that Warframe has taken is unexpected.” Following the conclusion of the New War storyline, the team was looking for the next narrative direction to take, and Ford credits former art director Michael Brennan, better known as Mynki in the Warframe community, with the suggestion it would be cool to visit other times.

Read more
You can prepare for Dragon Age: The Veilguard for $4 during PlayStation’s Summer Sale
A dragon appears on the ground in Dragon Age: Inquisition.

Dragon Age: The Veilguard from BioWare and EA is one of the biggest games set to launch this fall. It will mark the first new game in the fantasy RPG series in a decade and hopefully be a single-player return to form for BioWare after the ill-regarded Anthem. If you're planning to play Dragon Age: The Veilguard when it launches later this year, you should catch up on the series' lore by revisiting some of the older games in it. Thankfully, the PlayStation Store Summer Sale just gave you the perfect opportunity to get Dragon Age: Inquisition for quite a low price.

For the rest of July, Dragon Age: Inquisition -- Game of the Year Edition, which includes the 50+ hour-long RPG and all of its DLC, is discounted to just $4 on the PlayStation Store as part of this Summer Sale. That's a 90% discount from its typical $40 price tag. If you've been wondering what to pick up as part of PlayStation's big summer sale and plan on playing Dragon Age: The Veilguard later this year, then getting Dragon Age: Inquisition and all its DLC for just $4 is clearly the deal to go with.

Read more