Skip to main content

Even in Season 3, Warzone 2.0 still feels like it’s in beta

Activision hyped its Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 Season 3 update considerably ,with numerous blog posts showcasing what to expect, along with a content creator call that detailed a slew of highly requested features. Now that the update is live, some members of the game’s community are left feeling misled, as Season 3 isn’t quite the radical change they were expecting.

While it does include new features and fix some of the sequel’s long-standing issues, Warzone 2.0 is still packed with problems — many of which make the game less approachable. Season 3 is a step in the right direction, but considering just how low the bar was before its release, it’s not as impressive as it perhaps needs to be at this stage in the game’s life, especially from a massive studio such as Activision.

New toys

Characters parachuting in Warzone 2.0 Season 3.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Despite its plethora of issues, Season 3 does offer enough new content and features to at least justify checking out the update. With it, comes the new FJX Imperium sniper, the Cronen Squall battle rifle, and the return of one-shot snipers (though with a massive caveat). It also includes the Massive Resurgence mode, which allows players to respawn on the big Al Mazrah map. It’s a nice addition, as it encourages more aggressive playstyles on Al Mazrah since players aren’t penalized as hard for being eliminated.

Beyond that, the update does offer smaller, yet notable features that make a world of difference, such as the introduction of the Tempered plate vests, which allow players to reach max armor with only two plates instead of three. Likewise, certain movement elements were improved upon, adding a speed boost to sliding and a reduction of firing delay after diving. All of these features are much needed and make the game better, at least conceptually. In practice though, some of these ideas still need work.

A disappointing mess

Players battling on Al Mazrah in Warzone 2.0.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

You can look to Season 3’s new one-shot snipers as an example of that. To earn a one-hit elimination with a sniper, players must utilize explosive rounds on a bolt-action rifle. These rounds severely impact the weapon’s bullet velocity, but deal enough damage to down a fully plated enemy. The issue is that unlocking the explosive round attachment is a long, arduous process that many players will have to grind for at the start of the season.

Prior to the update’s release, Activision didn’t disclose just how the one-shot mechanic would work, so players weren’t able to grind ahead of time to unlock the attachment. The entire process of earning attachments is still wildly complicated, and it’s easy to see why a newcomer would be turned off. Sure, the one-shot sniping mechanic works well … if you spend hours upon hours to actually earn the attachment.

The Season 3 update is also packed to the brim with connection issues, making it unplayable at times due to lag. This doesn’t happen often, but it did occur multiple times during my play session, leading to many botched engagements in the heat of battle. Sometimes, the game will freeze momentarily, but only for some players. When this happens, you might get eliminated while the game is frozen, which is absolutely maddening.

The issues don’t stop there. My very first Massive Resurgence match failed to load in Buy Stations for me, despite them being available for my teammates. Other times, it takes painfully long to simply load into a game. The issues go on and on. It’s as if Warzone 2.0 is still in beta.

Using a sniper in Warzone 2.0 during Season 3.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

A major problem has to do with the way Activision set expectations for this update. For instance, the patch notes — while extensive — weren’t very detailed, which seems like a way for Activision to have its cake and eat it, too. In the past, Raven Software was known for its highly detailed patch notes, which would highlight changes down to the millisecond. But the Season 3 patch notes use vague terms like “increased” or “adjusted.” Activision also held a content creator call prior to the update’s release, promising major movement changes and even improvements to the game’s time to kill (TTK). Sadly, none of these features were implemented, causing confusion and disappointment.

The final nail in the coffin is that Activision seems increasingly focused on selling store bundles, particularly during Season 3. New during this update is a DLC bundle called BlackCell, which gives players COD points, battle pass tier skips, and other cosmetics for $30. Earning the new Season 3 weapons also takes a while, further encouraging players to spend real money. On top of that, a Bomb Squad bundle was added for DMZ players, giving them access to a fourth Active Duty Operator slot that cannot be earned by simply playing the game. Since Warzone 2.0 is free-to-play, it makes sense to see so many store bundles available — but given the game’s state, it’s egregious and borderline insulting to expect the community to spend real money.

While Season 3 does address some issues, Warzone 2.0 still has a long way to go before it’s on the level of the original Warzone.

Editors' Recommendations

Joseph Yaden
Joseph Yaden is a freelance journalist who covers Nintendo, shooters, and horror games. He mostly covers game guides for…
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0’s overpowered new DMZ bundle ignites pay-to-win fears
Character calling in killstreak in Warzone 2.0.

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 has struggled to retain players due to odd gameplay decisions and controversial mechanics that have divided the community. A new feature, though, has players especially up in arms.

Recently, publisher Activision released an in-game store bundle that some players consider a "pay-to-win" option, stirring up criticism once again. The paid bundle, "Roze and Thorn," gives DMZ players a free unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) that temporarily reveals the locations of enemy players at the start of a match, immediately offering an advantage.

Read more
Warzone 2.0’s one-shot snipers are hard to use. Try this weapon instead
Character holding sniper in Warzone 2.0.

Activision finally added the ability to earn one-hit kills with certain snipers as part of Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 Season 3. This was a much-needed update that makes heavy rifles more viable. However, this comes with a major caveat, as the only way to earn a one-hit kill is by utilizing explosive rounds on a small selection of snipers, which absolutely tanks a weapon's bullet velocity.

This makes it extremely difficult to actually hit your shots, so inexperienced players won't really reap the benefits of the newly-added one-shot capabilities. However, there is an alternative solution that everyone should try, as it's a viable option that works well at long distances.

Read more
Warzone 2.0 Plunder mode alleviates the stress of battle royale
Characters holding cash in Warzone 2.0 Plunder.

Call of Duty has been in a rough spot lately, with declining player counts and frustration from the community. But Activision has offset some of the negativity, at least slightly, with the release of the Plunder mode in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0. This fan-favorite mode was introduced in the original Warzone, but was absent from the sequel until now. In Plunder, the focus isn't necessarily on surviving, but rather on collecting as much cash as possible. Respawns are enabled and loadouts are available by default, and the overall pacing is faster, so Plunder plays differently from Battle Royale.

It's a refreshing break from the stress of attempting to be the last squad standing in Battle Royale, making Plunder great for players looking to chill. Since its release, I've had such a blast with Plunder that I almost forgot about all the massive problems plaguing Warzone 2.0 at large.
Learning the ropes

Read more