Skip to main content

Why Free-to-Play is a fad

paytowin
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Agree?  Disagree? Sound off in the comments below, and for the “pro” side of the argument, check out “Why Free-to-Play is here to stay.”

“Free-to-play.” Google knows how I spend my free time and has decided I’m the ideal target for these three words. I see them plastered above bare midriffs, strewn across battlefields and underlined by laser guns. All of the extremes of gaming, shrunk down to bite size and served to me – for free!

According to some talking heads this bait will be the game industry’s savior. By luring players in with free playtime (then bombarding them with microtransactions) games can custom-tailor monetization to fit almost any player. At least, that’s how the pitch goes. So why do I feel annoyance instead of excitement when “free” appears?

Pay-to-win

Developers working on a free-to-play games walk a tightrope. To attract money from players worthwhile rewards must be offered, yet gamers despise the idea that another might gain an edge because they pay more money.

Star Wars Old Republic
Image used with permission by copyright holder

This is a serious and difficult problem. As a player, I’ve experienced firsthand the frustration of being killed by a weapon I don’t have because I didn’t pay. On occasion, I’ve quit a free game for this reason, writing it off without paying a cent. Who wants to play against a stacked deck?

Worse, balance is a problem that can never be universally solved. Every game is different, which means balance is different, and solutions used in one game won’t work in another. Balance is difficult enough for a developer to perfect without worrying about how players who pay less stack up against players who pay more. Pay-to-win will always be an issue when micro-transactions can be used to purchase items relevant to gameplay.

Divided attention

Developers working on a free-to-play game aren’t just creating a game, they’re also building an online store. And that means support, marketing, and security concerns that developers don’t normally deal with. 

supportforum
Image used with permission by copyright holder

For small titles, with small stores, this problem is minimal. But complex games with many players often run into problems. Visit the forums for Turbine’s free-to-play games and you’ll see that they have support forums set up specifically for in-game stores. Most of the posts are, predictably, complaints or requests for customer support.

Issues related to free-to-play can even create problems where there’d normally be none; in Lord of the Rings Online, for example, some subscribers had trouble getting the Turbine Points owed to them on time (and I’m among their number). A small problem, yes – but one that casts the game in a poor light. In the recently launched Defiance there were issues with purchased weapons and items disappearing from inventories. This issues has supposedly been corrected, but once you are burned by a microtransaction it is hard to trust them again – and Defiance is a full retail release with a $60 price tag and resources many don’t have.

 I can’t help but wonder if managing the in-game store takes away from time and money that could otherwise be spent on content for subscribers.

Moving the goal posts

Games are entertainment. They’re created to provide an experience that is fun, engaging, intense, or all three. If a game doesn’t work as entertainment it fails, so developers focus on reducing frustration and increasing fun. Many gameplay concepts gamers take for granted – from fast-travel to frequent checkpoints – exist to make games more entertaining.

Free-to-play, however, moves the goal posts. The aim is no longer entertainment; instead, monetization is the goal. A minimal level of entertainment is required, sure, but only because a game with no players makes no money.

movinggoalposts
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The effects of this change can be felt in most free-to-play games. Repair costs in Star Wars: The Old Republic have gone up, yet the new end-game dailies reward little cash. The Lord of the Rings Online provides fast travel to quests, but only for a fee. Hawken’s useful countermeasures have limited charge and must be periodically re-purchased. In a full subscription or retail game the purposeful exclusion of convenience would be considered a flaw. With free-to-play, it’s just part of the game.

Don’t get me wrong; free-to-play games can be fun, and I’m a fan of all the games I listed. I just believe the entertainment these games offer is compromised by monetization. Free-to-play, by its very nature, demands that gameplay take a seat behind marketing.

Class warfare

When Star Wars: The Old Republic went free-to-play I decided to log in and see what had changed. At the time, the answer was “not much,” but while touring Hoth I noticed public chat was strangely active. The topic? Animosity between paying and free players. Paid players were not happy with the “space-poors” and “newbs” logging in to steal their kills, clutter their server and generally get in the way.

tor-free-play-f-large
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Such anger might seems strange, but tribalism is hardly a new trend in online games, and the paid players also have a practical point. Free players are not as powerful as paying players, can’t access operations (the game’s group content) or PvP, and can only lead an underclass of free-to-play guilds. There’s not much reason to befriend players who don’t subscribe.

Other games have shown the division, as well. I’ve also witnessed paid-vs-free animosity in Tribes: Ascend, Hawken and Blacklight: Retribution. Free players are supposed to provide paid players with content (more people to shoot), but their existence can fracture a game’s community.

Free-to-play isn’t going away, but…

free to play
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Mark Jacobs, known for his work on Dark Age of Camelot and Warhammer Online, recently predicted a free-to-play apocalypse. He stated in an interview that “free-to-play will become just another model” and warned that “you’re going to see a lot of developers shutting down.”

I agree. The hype around free games can make one forget that the model is based on hope. Make the game free, then hope that enough players pay to create a sustainable title. Yet firm data simply doesn’t exist. How much money does the average player spend? How often do free players turn into long-term customers? Do player numbers tend to go up after the initial free-to-play release or spiral down? What are the costs of running an in-game store? The answers to these questions are unknown.

But I don’t think we need to know. The only question that must be asked is this: does free-to-play make games more entertaining? I think the answer is no. And if the answer is no, free-to-play is “just another model.” One that is here to stay, no doubt, but certainly not the future of gaming. 

Image credit: Jon Candy/Flickr

Editors' Recommendations

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
Everything announced at the September 2023 State of Play
Venom in Marvel's Spider-Man 2.

September's State of Play presentation finally happened, and it gave us a clear look at what is coming to PlayStation 5 and PlayStation VR2 between now and early 2024. While the show was mainly third-party -focused, with games like Resident Evil 4, Final Fantasy VII Rebirth, Foamstars, and Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora, we also got new looks at Sony-published games like Marvel's Spider-Man 2 and Helldivers 2.

It wasn't quite as good as last September's State of Play, which was a spectacle that featured games like Tekken 8 and Like a Dragon: Ishin! That said, it had plenty of announcements that PlayStation fans should be keeping on their radar. If you missed out on watching this State of Play live, we've recapped every announcement from the September 2023 State of Play right here.

Read more
PlayStation VR2 just got 2 fun shooters, but I’m still waiting to be wowed
Key art for Firewall Ultra.

For the past six months, PlayStation VR2 players like myself have been yearning for new reasons to boot up our headsets. And after a long wait, the VR platform is getting a much-needed infusion with two brand-new titles. It’s a cause for celebration, but a mild one; neither of PSVR2's latest titles does much to revitalize my shock and awe for the platform six months into its life span.

The two games in question are the exclusive, Sony-published Firewall Ultra from First Contact Entertainment and Crossfire Sierra Squad from Smilegate. Both are realistic-looking military shooters, although they are different in execution. Firewall Ultra is a Rainbow Six Siege-style, squad-based multiplayer game, while Crossfire Sierra Squad taps more into the genre’s arcade roots to create VR shooting galleries.

Read more
Sony’s cloud handheld, the PlayStation Portal, will only stream certain games
Astro's Playroom booting up on the PlayStation Portal.

Sony has unveiled the price for its upcoming cloud gaming handheld, as well as an official name for the device: PlayStation Portal. However, one significant caveat to its functionality might sour people's interest in the handheld: It only supports PS4 and PS5 native games that the owner purchased.
PlayStation VR2 games can't be streamed to PlayStation Portal, which does make sense. More bafflingly, though, is the fact that the PlayStation Blog post states that "games that are streamed through PlayStation Plus Premium’s cloud streaming are not supported." That means you shouldn't pick up PlayStation Portal expecting to stream some PS3 and PS4 games available through PlayStation Plus Premium to the device. That's certainly an odd omission when it's currently PlayStation's most notable cloud gaming effort.
Although Microsoft is more closely associated with cloud gaming, Sony beat it to releasing a dedicated cloud gaming device. PlayStation Portal was first teased as Project Q during May's PlayStation showcase, but now, a PlayStation Blog post more clearly explains what we can actually expect from the handheld. Most importantly, we learned that PlayStation Portal will cost $200, which puts it underneath the cost of a Nintendo Switch, Xbox Series S, and other cloud gaming devices like the Logitech G Cloud Handheld.
As for what you're getting for that price tag, it's essentially a decent screen attached to two halves of a DualSense controller. The controllers on each side share all the functionality of the DualSense, including things like haptic feedback and adaptive triggers. In-between is an 8-inch LCD screen that streams games over Wi-Fi at up to a 1080p resolution and 60 frames per second. All in all, that's fairly solid for a cloud gaming handheld that is this cheap.
Sony confirmed that the PlayStation Portal will have a 3.5mm audio jack, but also used the same blog post to unveil two new wireless audio options. There's the Pulse Elite wireless headset that features a retractable boom mic and a charging hanger and Pulse Explore wireless earbuds that offer similar audio quality in earbud form.
None of these products are available for preorder or have a specific release date just yet, but they are all expected to launch before the end of the year.

Read more