Skip to main content

Koss KSC-35 Review

Koss KSC-35
“At $35 these headphones are a steal, even if only to replace the earbuds included in nearly every portable player”
Pros
  • Excellent bass
  • no amplifier needed
  • excellent for bass driven music
Cons
  • Uncomfortable after long use
  • flimsy plastic earclips
  • not very adjustable
  • midrange easily overpowered by the bass

Summary

While the Koss KSC-35s were difficult to wear for over an hour, they absolutely dominate the niche of work-out headphones.  Any deep pulsating or wispy deep toned ethereal music will bring out the best in these headphones, while more acoustic sounds will have a hard time being heard above the bass.  Games fare well, but only as long as the user is able to stand the tight ear clips, and for exercise phones they can’t be beat.  At $35 these headphones are a steal, even if only to replace the ear buds included in nearly every portable player.  And if you accidentally crush them at the gym, they’re cheap to replace.

Introduction

Most people know Koss headphones as the old standby el-cheapo headphones you can get at any drug store or music shop when you forget to pack your own on vacation.  It’s hard to believe that a pair of $35 headphones could be worth the upgrade from the tiny bulk buds your portable player came with.  Believe it.  At $35 the Koss KSC-35 headphones were discontinued and then re-continued due to popular demand.  They don’t have shiny metal-esque anime styled covers, but what they do have is some of the most amazing sound for their price range.

The KSC-35s are individual earpiece, over-the-ear, foam padded designed headphones.  The plastic clips that hold them to the pinna of the ear securely, but are not as flexible as some may want.  While they should fit ~95% of the population, but prolonged use could get slightly painful.  However, a quick review of the audiophile headphone forums will result in repeated recommendations for one main use: exercise.

Testing

The sound produced by the KSC-35s is very clear.  Highs are crisp, but not scratchy.  Mids are weaker, but the bass is excellent.  The bass is very deep, and very powerful – excellent for jogging or cycling.  The open air design allows the wearer to hear the surrounding noise in the background, and they’re easy enough to drive that even at ¾ volume, most portable players will be bordering on too loud.  Sound does leak out easily, so avoid bringing them to the library.  The soundstage is not as continuous as we would like – left and right side are distinguishable, but panning sounds will fade and reform at the center slightly – but this is easily forgiven when you consider it allows for better localization of external sounds.

We tested the KSC-35s with the following recordings: Bjork’s “Vespertine” (DVD-Audio and MP3), Mahler Symphony 10 (Berliner Philharmoniker – conducted by Sir Simon Rattle – DVD-Audio), The Cure’s “Disintegration” (Audio CD + MP3), Gary Numan’s “Exile” (CD and MP3), and Delerium’s “Karma” (CD and MP3) from a SoundBlaster Audigy 2 Platinum (for DVD-Audio, CD, and MP3), iRiver SlimX 350 (CD and MP3), and Rio PSA|Play 120 (MP3).  All MP3s encoded with VBR 160kbps-300 kbps/44kHz.

During the Bjork audition, the headphones had no trouble keeping up with the deepest bass lines.  The wider spatialization was noticeable, with most sound appearing to come from both sides or directly in front.  This held true for Mahler, as well.  Mids shined through with minimal distortion in Mahler, but you could hear the stress in the phones.  Both Mahler and The Cure sounded smoothed over by the intense bass, including the MP3 encoded Cure.  Vocals were pushed into the background slightly, and guitars struggled to be heard regardless of equalizer settings.  Gary Numan was downright haunting, and sounded excellent with the airy low frequency sweeping effects.  Delerium, which relies heavily on midrange frequencies was the worst sounding, and was simply not acceptable.

For use in games, Quake 3, Tribes 2, and Jedi Knight 2 were used.  The overpowering bass was great for games.  We could feel every rocket in out molars it was so deep.  Localization of sound was acceptable.  Cloaked player in Tribes 2 were easily identified, players in adjoining rooms could be anticipated with decent accuracy, and deflected blaster shots in JKII came across clean.  Using Force Push and Pull in JKII was even more fun, since the sound could be felt.  Unfortunately, after 45 minutes the discomfort took over, and testing halted.

Conclusion

While the Koss KSC-35s were difficult to wear for over an hour, they absolutely dominate the niche of work-out headphones.  Any deep pulsating or wispy deep toned ethereal music will bring out the best in these headphones, while more acoustic sounds will have a hard time being heard above the bass.  Games fare well, but only as long as the user is able to stand the tight ear clips, and for exercise phones they can’t be beat.  At $35 these headphones are a steal, even if only to replace the ear buds included in nearly every portable player.  And if you accidentally crush them at the gym, they’re cheap to replace.

Editors' Recommendations

Shocker: Amazon reviews still can’t be trusted
Amazon reviews on a desktop computer, iPad, and iPhone.

A recent report by U.K. consumer watchdog Which? is yet another stark reminder that customer ratings on Amazon are not necessarily a reliable way of knowing if a product is good or not. The publication conducted a review of the e-commerce giant's Bluetooth headphones category and discovered that nine of the 10 top products ranked based on customer ratings contained reviews of completely different products, thus artificially boosting the number of four-star and five-star reviews.

The practice is known as review merging. Among the products that were used to boost headphone ratings were umbrellas, personalized jigsaw puzzles, bowls, and jars. Bose was the only top-10 Bluetooth headphone brand that wasn't found to be guilty of the practice.

Read more
Samsung S95B OLED hands-on review: Brilliant potential
Samsung S95B OLED TV with image of a bright flower on screen.

Samsung has been using OLED screens in its phones for years. But for the single exception of the short-lived ES9500 in 2012, the company has refused to make an OLED TV. In fact, for the past 10 years, as LG amassed accolades for its OLED TVs, Samsung took every available opportunity (and spared no expense) to pound the table about how its LCD-based TVs were superior to OLED.

To be fair, today's advanced micro-LED backlit, quantum dot-infused LCD TVs do hold a few advantages over OLED, but despite a decade of technological advancement, OLED's perfect blacks and stunning contrast still remain elusive to LCD-based TVs. One can only cheat the laws of physics to a point.

Read more
Google Pixel Buds A-Series hands-on review: Same buds, way better price
Google Pixel Buds A-Series

When Google launched its second-gen Pixel Buds in 2020, it created something of a conundrum for buyers of true wireless earbuds. On the one hand, their tiny size, wireless charging, comfortable fit, and excellent integration with Android and Google Assistant made them an attractive choice. But on the other hand, for the price ($179), it felt like Google had left out some important features, like active noise cancellation (ANC), transparency (ambient sound), and the ability to use their standout skills with Apple’s iOS devices.

One year later, those choices put the Pixel Buds into an even deeper corner as new products like the $199 JBL Tour Pro+, $120 Amazon Echo Buds 2, $95 1More ComfoBuds Pro, and $130 Soundcore Liberty Air 2 Pro have all trotted out great sound, ANC, and transparency.

Read more