Skip to main content

As Netflix transforms TV, HBO, CBS and Fox still struggle with streaming

Last November, Netflix Chief Reed Hastings handed competitors the key to outfoxing his massively popular streaming service: Just let paid subscribers stream with apps. Industry wonks call the concept “TV everywhere.” By making shows available on any device at any time, TV everywhere apps offer Netflix-like ease. Just one thing: Hastings was confident enough to hand out the free advice simply because he doesn’t think networks can do it properly.

The past week has made Hastings look downright prophetic. CBS failed to properly stream the Grammys, HBO announced it would outright copy Netflix’s content strategy, and Fox began dangling $25,000 prize money just to entice users into using its streaming apps. What’s the problem?

Apps have changed the way we watch in a fundamental way.

Fox’s “Stream It and Dream It” prize program is actually in its second iteration — it will run for three weeks from February 16 through March 8. All viewers have to do is sign in to any of Fox’s five different Fox Network apps, authenticated by a cable subscription, and they’ll be given a code to enter into a micro site. Fox is even giving cord-cutters the chance to play the game, offering a temporary pass to all five apps, including FOX Now, FXNow, Nat Geo TV, BTN2Go, and Fox Sports Go. Confused about all those different apps? Well, that’s part of the problem.

Why is Fox so desperate to get users on board? Cable companies and the big networks (some of which are one in the same) have been trying to push TV everywhere apps down the throats of viewers since Time Warner came up with the concept (according to Hastings) in 2009. That’s because the data shows that app users are much less likely to give their cable company the boot — Variety even cites a HUB Research survey that claims 73 percent of TV everywhere users “feel more positive” about their TV provider.

There’s no mystery there: Being able to take your TV show or movie with you virtually anywhere — from the big screen to your smartphone, and everywhere in between — has changed the way we watch in a fundamental way. And Netflix’s brilliant model of churning out its own TV shows and movies at a fevered pace has changed what we watch, too.

Why-streaming-apps-can't-challenge-Netflix-
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Unfortunately for traditional TV services, that model doesn’t translate very well. That’s because, in order to make TV everywhere apps work like Netflix, the companies that make TV shows and movies would have to license their content to multiple distributors, including cable companies and satellite providers as well as multiple networks, across multiple apps.

“The challenge in the industry is that it’s very fragmented between the cable networks and the distributors, and so it’s really tough to work well together, to extend the ecosystem,” Hastings said in November. “We’ve always been most scared of TV everywhere as the fundamental threat. That is, you get all of this incredible content that the ecosystem presents, now on demand, for your same $80 a month. And yet the inability of that ecosystem to execute on that, for a variety of reasons, has been troubling.”

And that lack of order and consistency is just one of the many challenges of streaming.

HBO recently found out the hard way that converting to streaming isn’t an easy feat to accomplish. The company had so much trouble building out its own standalone streaming app, HBO Now, it turned to an odd source for help: Major League Baseball. Strange though it might seem, MLB is a big player in streaming, having been at work developing streaming apps for over a decade. And even with MLB’s expertise, HBO Now has had serious trouble taking hold, announcing fewer than a million subscribers since its launch in April 2015. In comparison, HBO has 30 million cable subscribers, and Netflix has 75 million subscribers.

HBO isn’t just copying Netflix’s streaming model. The company announced in its fourth-quarter earnings report this week that it will be making strides to make its service more like Netflix, including a ramp up of production by 50 percent, as well as a focus on international expansion.

Fox’s rival network CBS has had its own troubles trying to make streaming a bigger part of its overall ecosystem. The network created a standalone $6-a-month service called CBS All Access in October 2014. While the service has had plenty of time to get cooking, it crashed hard when CBS attempted to stream the Grammys on Monday night.

Though streaming live TV comes with its own challenges that Netflix and similar streamers don’t have to worry about, it’s abundantly clear that traditional TV is struggling to stream. We’ll have to wait and see how networks and big cable respond to the challenges of streaming in the coming years. But for now, this is Netflix’s world. And every other up-and-coming streamer is just trying to keep up.

Ryan Waniata
Former Home Theater & Entertainment Editor
Ryan Waniata is a multi-year veteran of the digital media industry, a lover of all things tech, audio, and TV, and a…
Harry Potter HBO TV show show finds its McGonagall and Snape
A woman holds a wand while a man puts his hand across his shoulder.

HBO's Harry Potter series is on the verge of casting two critical characters.

Per Deadline, Janet McTeer is in negotiations to play Professor Minerva McGonagall, while Paapa Essiedu is nearing a deal to play Professor Severus Snape. The duo would join John Lithgow, who will star as Professor Albus Dumbledore.

Read more
7 best drama TV shows of the 2020s so far, ranked
Adam Scott holding a red ball in "Severance" season 2.

Audiences continue to live in the Golden Age of Television, as they have been treated to some of the best drama shows in history. Whether they're sci-fi mysteries like Severance or grounded, character-driven pieces like Succession, the stories shown on TV have kept viewers hooked to their screens and tuning in for more.

Though the decade is only half over, the television industry has already produced more of the best drama shows of the 2020s.
7. The White Lotus (2021-present)

Read more
If you have to watch one Netflix movie in February 2025, stream this one
Kevin Costner stares with cowboy flintiness in a still from Horizon: An American Saga—Chapter 1

The Western genre is not what it once was. There was a time when Westerns were like superhero movies. There were 40 of them in theaters per year, and most of them were bad. Today, Westerns have moved at least in part over to TV, and the ones that remain in theaters don't command the audience they once did.
Netflix actually has a pretty excellent selection of Westerns, though, and there's one in particular you should definitely check out this February. Horizon: An American Saga – Chapter 1 was not the rollicking box office success that its star and director Kevin Costner may have hoped. The movie follows a group of disparate characters all moving towards the foundation of a shared town. The catch, though, is that this is just part one of a multi-part saga, and as a result, it cuts things off before the end of the story. All that being said, here are three reasons you should check it out now that it's on Netflix.

We also have guides to the best movies on Netflix, the best movies on Hulu, the best movies on Amazon Prime Video, the best movies on Max, and the best movies on Disney+.
Costner can be an excellent director
Horizon: An American Saga Chapter 1 Movie Clip | Make It Known | Warner Bros. Entertainment
Kevin Costner's movies are not uniformly excellent, but Horizon is shot like an old-fashioned Western, with plenty of sweeping vistas and beautiful landscapes. More importantly, Costner understands which scenes to keep and which to cut in his three-hour epic.
Each of the myriad characters at the story's center feels fully fleshed out by the time their chunk of the narrative has run its course. The story may not be over, but Costner leaves you wanting more.

Read more