Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Audio / Video
  3. News

TV networks plan to show fewer commercials, and we have streaming to thank

Stephanie Topacio Long
By

netflix vs porn hotel room entertainment person watching tv
baranqv / Shutterstock.com
The TV networks’ trend of adding more ad time per hour of TV is finally going to be reversed. After seeing the success streaming services have had in reaching younger viewers, several media companies, including Time Warner Inc., 21st Century Fox Inc., and Viacom Inc., now plan to reduce the amount of air time dedicated to commercials, reports Bloomberg.

As TV ratings have been falling, so has demand from advertisers; as such, TV networks have been trying to make up revenue by showing more ads. Nielsen data reveals that the average ad time per hour has increased from 14:27 to 15:38 minutes on cable TV and from 13:25 to 14:15 minutes on broadcast networks since 2009.

Recommended Videos

Many viewers, however, don’t have much tolerance for TV programs packed with ads, especially not when there are ad-free alternatives out there like Netflix. On top of that, Bloomberg points out that advertisers worry that their messages are being lost in the chaos of so many commercials. Media companies, in trying to mitigate these conditions, have put different strategies in place, but each of them now looks to cut back on commercial time for viewers.

Related

In an earnings call last week, Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes announced that truTV will air half as many ads during prime-time original shows beginning late 2016. Not coincidentally, the network skews toward a younger audience — one that is thought to be particularly ad-adverse. Should the experiment go well, the strategy would be introduced across additional Time Warner channels. Meanwhile, Viacom has already cut back on commercial breaks on its networks.

Fox, on the other hand, plans to shake up its online ad experience on Hulu. Instead of showing two-and-a-half minutes of commercials, the company announced that it will offer an alternative: a 30-second interactive ad. The idea is that showing viewers a shorter ad that they must engage with will be more effective — and therefore more valuable to advertisers. “The customer can avoid a whole number of other ads, so we’ll charge a higher price,” said Fox CEO James Murdoch said at a conference in September.

Should these theories prove to be effective, it would be a win for viewers, advertisers, and media companies alike. It remains to be seen if these strategies will be enough to stave off streaming services like Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon, but it’s further proof that such streamers are keeping networks on their toes.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Stephanie Topacio Long
Stephanie Topacio Long
Contributor
Stephanie Topacio Long is a writer and editor whose writing interests range from business to books. She also contributes to…
If you have to watch one (HBO) Max movie in April 2024, stream this one
Andrew Garfield sits at a table in The Social Network.

HBO built its name off of the movies that it was able to bring to its premium cable channel, and that hasn't changed now that the service has extended its focus to streaming as Max. In this month alone, Max is offering subscribers such films as Black Swan, Elizabethtown, all of the Harry Potter movies, the Infernal Affairs trilogy, The Thomas Crown Affair, and many more. But for us, the one movie that you have to watch on Max in April is The Social Network, a 2010 drama that chronicles the founding of Facebook.

The Social Network is one of the best films by director David Fincher, and its tagline sums up the story pretty well: "You don't get to 500 million friends without making a few enemies." And if there's one thing that main character Mark Zuckerberg excels at in this film, it's making enemies on his way toward making a fortune. If you've never seen this movie before, here are five reasons why you should watch The Social Network on Max in April.
Jesse Eisenberg plays a villain for our era

Read more
What is DirecTV Stream: plans, pricing, channels, and more
DirecTV Stream app icon on Apple TV.

DirecTV Stream is the latest name for what once was AT&T’s live tv and on-demand streaming service, previously called AT&T TV, among other names. It's now jointly owned by AT&T and private equity firm TPG Inc., if you're concerned about such things. That new venture means that we no longer have insight into how many subscribers DirecTV Stream has, but it's believed to be the smallest of the live streaming services in the United States. (The last time we got numbers was at the end of 2020, when the service was at about 656,000 subscribers, or about half that of Fubo, or no bigger than 13 percent of YouTube TV's base.)

In any event, you're looking to cut the cable cord, DirecTV Stream is on more service to consider among others such as Hulu With Live TV, Sling TV, and the aforementioned YouTube TV.

Read more
10 shows that aren’t worth the hype
Ayo Edebiri and Jeremy Allen White as Sydney and Carmy cookin in a kitchen in The Bear.

Are we still living in the so-called Golden Age of Television? However confusing as the term might be right now, it's undeniable that both streaming and cable produced some all-time great shows in the past decade, like Succession and Veep. For its part, the late '90s and 2000s kickstarted the trend with outright masterpieces like The Sopranos and Six Feet Under.

And yet, while many of these shows live up to the hype, and others are accurately rated, considering their overall quality, a few can be described as absurdly overrated. These TV offerings have received overwhelming acclaim, usually within a determined period, with both critics and audiences lauding them as absolute triumphs of the small screen. However, hindsight will reveal their acclaim is vastly overblown, and, at the end of the day, they're really not worth the hype.
Parks and Recreation (2009-2015)

Read more