Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Audio / Video
  3. News

You’re wasting money on audiophile cables, new tests suggest

A $7 cable matched a $4,000 option in lab measurements and listening tests.

Add as a preferred source on Google
A woman wearing headphones with her eyes closed.
VinzentWeinbeer / Pixababy

You’re wasting money on audiophile cables, new tests suggest. A controlled comparison between a budget RCA cable and a boutique model priced in the thousands found no real change in sound quality.

That conclusion comes from lab-grade measurements paired with listening checks. The findings push back on a long-held belief that pricier cables unlock better audio.

Recommended Videos

In this test, a roughly $7 Amazon Basics RCA cable went up against a high-end option costing over $4,000. Despite the huge gap in price, both delivered the same results in measurements and listening scenarios.

Lab tests show identical performance

The clearest evidence comes from controlled measurements using professional analyzer hardware. Both cables were evaluated for distortion, noise, and frequency handling under the same conditions.

With a 4 kHz signal, each cable introduced only minimal distortion, with no meaningful separation between them. The more expensive option even picked up slightly more electrical noise in that run, though the difference didn’t matter in real use.

Across a wider range, the pattern held steady. Frequency response matched, phase behavior stayed aligned, and signal transitions showed no practical difference. Even highly zoomed-in analyzer graphs failed to show any real deviation between the two.

Jitter testing followed the same trend. The cheaper cable showed a tiny increase, but it was measured in extremely small units and came with a caveat, it was also longer than the premium cable.

Why the myth still sticks

So why does this belief keep circulating? Much of it comes down to perception and expectation.

Listeners can feel like they hear differences during casual listening, especially when they know which product they’re using. But those impressions tend to fade in blind comparisons, where bias is removed.

There’s also the appeal of premium materials and technical language. High-end cables highlight features like silver conductors or specialized insulation, which sound convincing but didn’t produce audible gains here.

Some design choices can even add downsides. The expensive cable in this test used a locking connector that adds complexity and potential risk without improving signal delivery.

Where your money matters more

If cables aren’t the problem, the rest of your system likely is.

The results reinforce that RCA cables already operate comfortably within their limits. They carry audio with low noise, low distortion, and wide bandwidth, so they aren’t holding your setup back.

Real improvements come from other parts of the chain. Speakers, amplifiers, room acoustics, and source quality have a far greater impact on what you actually hear.

Spending thousands on a cable doesn’t just bring diminishing returns, it brings none in measurable terms. That makes it one of the least effective upgrades you can make.

Stick with a reliable, well-built cable and put the rest of your budget into gear that actually changes the listening experience.

Paulo Vargas
Paulo Vargas is an English major turned reporter turned technical writer, with a career that has always circled back to…
I’m already surrounded by AI. I don’t need ChatGPT living beside my bed
No, OpenAI. I don’t want your ChatGPT speaker.
Apple HomePod 2023

AI is all around us now. From your phone to home appliances, it practically sits everywhere--and it might just get a lot more intimate. A recent report claims OpenAI and Jony Ive are working on a small, screenless AI speaker shaped somewhat like a doughnut. It could be battery-powered, portable enough to carry around the house, and packed with microphones, cameras, sensors, speakers, lights, and even moving parts.

It sounds like someone finally decided the Amazon Echo needed eyes and a personality. And not to be too negative, the idea of a "ChatGPT"-powered hardware really doesn't sound so great.

Read more
Sony WH-1000XM4C leak hints at a cheaper take on the iconic XM4, and it’s coming soon
The upcoming headphones could retain the beloved foldable design while undercutting the flagship XM6.
Man wearing Sony WH-1000XM4 ANC Headphones on public transportation.

Sony may not be done with the WH-1000XM4 just yet. According to a fresh leak via Billbil-kun, the company is preparing to launch the Sony WH-1000XM4C, a more affordable version of its hugely popular noise-canceling headphones. The upcoming model is expected to arrive in early September, with pricing reportedly set at €249.99 in Europe and £219.99 in the UK, making it significantly cheaper than the flagship WH-1000XM6.

A familiar design with a lower price

Read more
OpenAI’s first gadget sounds like a tiny expressive AI companion
The device will have a doughnut-shaped body, built-in cameras, and moving parts
OpenAI press image

For months, reports have suggested that OpenAI’s first hardware product would be a screen-free smart speaker designed to act more like an AI companion. We already knew it could understand its surroundings, be carried around the home, and proactively help users. A new Bloomberg report now gives us a clearer picture of what the device may actually look like.

As per the report, OpenAI’s first gadget will be shaped like a doughnut and measure about the same size as a hockey puck. You will be able to carry it between rooms or leave it nearby on whatever surface is convenient. The device is expected to be on the expensive side, as the company has pondered pricing it around $300 to $400. A release is currently planned for 2027.

Read more