Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Smart Home
  3. Features

Google’s Nest thermostat cull is a warning to all smart home users

Add as a preferred source on Google
Nest Thermostat
Nest

If you were an early adopter of the Nest Learning Thermostat, bad news: Google has announced the end of support for the first and second generation models as of October 25. That means that, for all intents and purposes, you can drop the “smart” descriptor. You’ll no longer be able to control the devices from your phone or from Google Assistant, although they will continue to function as standard, wall-mounted thermostats.

Google’s support post reads, “As we look at what it takes to support your energy needs going forward, it has become increasingly challenging to continue to update these products given the early hardware. So we made the difficult decision that starting October 25, 2025, Nest Learning Thermostat (1st gen, 2011), Nest Learning Thermostat (2nd gen, 2012), and Nest Learning Thermostat (2nd gen, Europe version, 2014) will no longer receive software updates.”

Recommended Videos

A few features will remain in place, like schedules and modes, but will require manual control to work. If there’s a silver lining to be found, it’s that Google has promised to reach out to eligible customers with discounts on the Nest Learning Thermostat 4th gen, the most recent model. Customers in the United States will receive $130 off, while Canadian users will receive $160 off. European Nest owners get a different offer, with 50% off the Tado Smart Thermostat X Starter Kit.

While it’s natural for both hardware and software to lose support over time, the news is still disappointing for fans who haven’t felt the need to upgrade to a newer model. The discount coupon is a nice gesture, but it doesn’t really make up for the added cost. Someone more cynical might look at this as a $140 fee to continue using your smart thermostat that you already paid for.

And unfortunately, this is far from the first time a smart home device has gone kaput after launch. To be fair, the first-gen Nest Learning Thermostat was released in 2011, so it has had 14 years of support. The second generation was released in 2012. It isn’t as if these devices were sold and immediately discontinued, but most people expect their electronics to continue functioning until they break.

In this sense, it might be better to change how we view smart home technology. Like a toaster or a stand mixer, smart home technology is more of an appliance — something to streamline the day-to-day, rather than a computer or old game console you might want to pull out in twenty years for a dose of nostalgia. Appliances break down and you expect to replace them after a while, and it might be time to take that same approach when it comes to smart home tech.

Of course, you could argue that Cuisinart won’t suddenly strip away the majority of your toaster’s functionality because it’s old. That would be ridiculous, after all — but your toaster likely isn’t vulnerable to cyberattacks (although there are smart toasters available now, but the discussion of their relevancy is a topic for a different time.)

Google is stuck between a thermostat and a hard place. By ending support for its oldest models, Google is better able to dedicate its attention to improving the functionality of new gadgets, and it also doesn’t have to worry about bad actors using the older devices as a backdoor into a home network. At the same time, it has to balance its bottom line with customer satisfaction.

And oh boy, are some customers unhappy with this decision. Since the news broke, users have taken to social media and Reddit to express their displeasure. As u/limitless__ puts it, “It’s ok to EOL a product by pulling support. What’s not okay is forcing you to migrate to Google and then killing the app.”

Numerous other users said Google’s decision has caused them to lose trust in the company, and suggested a better path would be to maintain full functionality while ceasing software updates. If a user wants to risk security vulnerabilities, that should be their decision, not Google’s.

I find myself inclined to agree with that general sentiment. While I understand the move from an intellectual and objective standpoint, I don’t like that a company can strip functionality away. It adds to the idea that we no longer truly “own” anything, especially in terms of anything connected to the internet. Call me old-fashioned, but I’ve always felt like if I purchase something, it should be mine to use as I please.

At least some functionality remains. Other smart home platforms have been shut down and their hardware turned into expensive paperweights, like Iris by Lowe’s. First launched in 2012, it worked (kind of) until 2019 when Lowe’s shut the entire system down. The only concession to users was a refund for any devices that wouldn’t work on other platforms, although Samsung stepped in to help users migrate compatible Iris products over to the SmartThings platform.

Long-time Google users shouldn’t be too surprised, though. The company is so known for ending support on projects, sometimes with next to no warning, that an entire “Google Graveyard” exists. You can check it out yourself at KilledByGoogle.com, where services like the Google Podcasts app, Google Hangouts, and numerous other applications haunt the digital landscape. There are several Nest products there too, including Nest Secure, the Nest x Yale lock, and Nest Protect.

Patrick Hearn
Former Technology Writer
Patrick has written about tech for more than 15 years and isn't slowing down anytime soon. With previous clients ranging from…
My smart home experiment has reached its natural limit
Smart-home technology keeps improving, but being easier to automate doesn’t make everything worth automating
Computer, Electronics, Laptop, Smart Home

The first device I added to my smart home was a light bulb. It seemed like the safest possible place to start. I could turn it on from anywhere, put it on a schedule, and eventually work it into routines with everything else.

Then I tapped the button in the app and waited. The delay was only about half a second, but half a second is surprisingly noticeable when the alternative is a wall switch that responds immediately and has never once asked for a firmware update. Using my phone was worse. I had to unlock it, find the app, open the right room, and tap the light I could have switched on several steps earlier.

Read more
Google Home’s Interactive Storytime feature has me wondering who actually asked for this
Google Home gets interactive AI storytime, smarter alarms, and broader camera support.
Computer, Electronics, Tablet Computer

Google Home's latest update introduces several new features, including Gemini-powered Interactive Storytime. While I’m not sure who asked for the feature, it lets families build original stories about specific topics on the fly, instead of just listening to a known story. 

So what's the big new feature here?

Read more
Proxima wants to move blood tests into the home, and it has cleared an important early hurdle
The portable analyzer delivers blood-count results in about 20 minutes, but its promise depends on transparent clinical data
Furniture, Table, Desk

Algocyte’s Proxima is designed to run blood-count tests from a small finger-prick sample and send the results to a clinician in about 20 minutes. For patients who need frequent monitoring, that could mean fewer trips to a clinic or laboratory.

The device has also moved beyond the concept stage. Proxima carries UK conformity credentials, while Algocyte operates under a certified medical-device quality system. Those steps give the project more weight than a prototype shown at a launch event.

Read more