Skip to main content

Viacom Sues Google/YouTube for $1 Billion

Back when Google spent $1.65 billion to acquire video sharing site YouTube, folks in some quarters were wondering how wise a move that might have been. The only reason YouTube hadn’t been sued out of existence, the argument went, was that the company didn’t have any significant assets with which it could pay damages to media companies for the tens (hundreds?) of thousands of copyrighted clips users uploaded to the site.

But when Google took over, YouTube’s pockets went from empty to very, very deep. And today, media conglomerate Viacom has filed suit against YouTube and Google, seeking $1 billion in damages from “massive copyright infringement” perpetrated by the site.

The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, and—in addition to that tidy $1 billion in damages—seeks an injunction prohibiting Google and YouTube from further copyright infringement. Viacom claims that nearly 160,000 clips of Viacom content have been made available on YouTube without Viacom’s consent, and that those clips have been viewed more than 1.5 billion times.

In a statement, Viacom characterized YouTube’s business strategy: “YouTube is a significant, for-profit organization that has built a lucrative business out of exploiting the devotion of fans to others’ creative works in order to enrich itself and its corporate parent Google. Their business model, which is based on building traffic and selling advertising off of unlicensed content, is clearly illegal and is in obvious conflict with copyright laws. In fact, YouTube’s strategy has been to avoid taking proactive steps to curtail the infringement on its site, thus generating significant traffic and revenues for itself while shifting the entire burden—and high cost—of monitoring YouTube onto the victims of its infringement.

Representatives from Google and YouTube have so far declined to comment on the suit.

In October of 2006, Viacom asked YouTube to take down about 10,000 of the longest clips of its programming available on YouTube, while the two companies engaged in active negotiations about offering content on the video sharing site. Google and YouTube have promised to deploy filtering technology which would automatically prevent upload of infringing material to YouTube; that technology has yet to appear, and YouTube has instead offered content providers tools with which they can more efficiently report infringing content. Viacom simmered a while, but then in early February demanded YouTube take down every last clip of Viacom-copyrighted content from its site; in its complaint, Viacom identified more than 100,000 clips it wanted removed from the service.

Viacom properties include MTV, Paramount, BET, and Comedy Central, among many others.

Editors' Recommendations

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
The 6 best Herman Miller alternatives in 2024
The Steelcase Leap.

Herman Miller has established itself as one of the preeminent experts on office chairs. Its lineup is filled with premium products like the Aeron and Embody, which offer multiple customization options, heaps of adjustability, and enough cushioning to support your body through even the longest workday.

All those luxurious features don't come cheap, however, and Herman Miller is also known as one of the most expensive brands on the market. That can make it difficult to add one to your home office without stretching your budget. Or, maybe you're currently using a Herman Miller and don't think it lived up to expectations. Whatever the case may be, there are several Herman Miller alternatives for you to consider for your next office chair.

Read more
Yale’s newest smart lock is designed for renters
The Yale Approach installed on a door.

Yale -- the company responsible for the well-reviewed Assure Lock 2 -- has just launched its first retrofit smart lock built specifically for renters. The Yale Approach Lock with Wi-Fi is an interior-only smart lock that fits on top of most standard deadbolts, allowing renters to bring a bit of smart functionality to their home without the need to replace the underlying hardware.

Installing the Yale Approach should take just 10 minutes and doesn't require much more than a screwdriver. And since it doesn't require a new set of keys or lock swap, there's a good chance it'll be supported by most landlords. Along with an easy installation process, the Yale Approach uses features like Auto-Lock and Auto-Unlock to let folks easily enter their home and secure it when they leave.

Read more
Does the Pan-Tilt Mount work with the Blink Mini 2?
The Blink Mini installed in the Pan-Tilt Mount.

The Blink Mini 2 is a solid security camera that clocks in at a great price, making it the ideal option for shoppers on a budget. It takes everything people loved about the original Blink Mini and makes it even better, offering an affordable way to keep tabs on your home remotely. The Blink Mini eventually received a unique accessory known as the Blink Pan-Tilt Mount, allowing users to freely rotate the camera and see all corners of their home. And since the Blink hasn't yet released a Blink Mini 2 Pan-Tilt Mount, many folks are wondering if the original Pan-Tilt Mount works with the Blink Mini 2.

Unfortunately, the Pan-Tilt Mount does not work with the Blink Mini 2. If you're interested in learning more, here's a closer look at why that's the case, along with info as to whether Blink plans to launch a Pan-Tilt Mount for the Blink 2 in the future.
Why doesn't the Pan-Tilt Mount work with Blink Mini 2?

Read more