Skip to main content

Judge sides with FTC, finds Amazon liable for in-app charges made by kids

A judge has decided that Amazon is responsible for letting children make in-app purchases without any constraints, which racked up bills for their parents.

If the case sounds familiar, that’s because it first began in July of 2014, when the Federal Trade Commission sued Amazon for its in-app purchases. Parents typically leave their credit card information stored in app stores, which lets them make purchases quickly. The lawsuit targeted the fact that kids could make such purchases without parental consent. The only restriction was for payments over $20, which then required a password.

Recommended Videos

Amazon isn’t the only company to have faced this complaint from consumers and the FTC. The commission reached settlements with Apple and Google — Apple gave back more than $32 million, and Google returned $19 million to customers with app-hungry kids. Google also altered its process of getting free apps, making it harder for children to do so without a Google account password.

Amazon previously rejected the FTC’s claims, and the company and the commission decided to duke it out in court. Now, the federal court presiding over the case has ruled that the steps Amazon took to inform its customers about in-app charges in free apps were “not sufficient.”

“We are pleased the federal judge found Amazon liable for unfairly billing consumers for unauthorized in-app purchases by children,” FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez said in a blog post. “We look forward to making a case for full refunds to consumers as a result of Amazon’s actions.”

While the court ruled in favor of the FTC, Amazon and the commission still have to respond to related court orders to provide further information. The court will then make a “determination as to the appropriate remedy.”

Julian Chokkattu
Former Mobile and Wearables Editor
Julian is the mobile and wearables editor at Digital Trends, covering smartphones, fitness trackers, smartwatches, and more…
Nothing Phone 3 is the firm’s biggest swing at Apple and Samsung yet
Is this the shot-in-the-arm the smartphone market desperately needs?
A person holding the Nothing Phone 2, with the lights active.

The Nothing Phone 3 will officially be available in the US, as the company looks to take on the likes of the iPhone 16, Samsung Galaxy S25 and Google Pixel 9 with a handset Nothing founder and CEO, Carl Pei, calls its "first true flagship smartphone".

Those looking for an alternative smartphone option this year will be able to pick up the Phone 3 from Amazon and Nothing's own website, reports TechCrunch.

Read more
This one iPadOS 26 feature has me excited for the iPhone Fold
Semi-open state of a foldable iPhone concept

Samsung is set to launch the seventh generation of its Galaxy Z Fold book-style folding phone this Summer, but its biggest rival is yet to show its folding phone hand. Apple has long been expected to unveil an iPhone Fold, and the latest rumors suggest that it will launch next year.

I’ve used almost every folding phone released globally, with some exceptions for extremely obscure ones. While I've always been curious what an iPhone Fold would look like, I was fairly certain that Apple shouldn't build it, as I wasn’t sure they could deliver on one necessary feature.

Read more
These are the 4 best alternatives to the Google Pixel 9a
A person taking the Google Pixel 9a out of a pocket.

The best cheap phone race has been reignited by the Google Pixel 9a, which brings the Google Pixel 9 series experience at a significantly lower price. Starting at $449, Google’s latest Pixel offers the flagship processor of its siblings for flagship-level performance, an excellent camera, and long-term software support.

Yet, Google’s software experience won’t be for everyone; there are obvious tradeoffs in the specs sheet to enable the low price; the camera bar design is somewhat polarizing for long-term fans, and there’s no telephoto camera. 

Read more