Skip to main content

Let Bono be a lesson: Celeb tech endorsements are better for laughs than sales

bono says sorry pushing new album itunes users tim cook u2 apple iphone 6 2014
Image used with permission by copyright holder
During Apple’s October event, Tim Cook’s biggest smile didn’t come when he announced the iPhone 6, but when he had a little finger kiss with U2 frontman Bono, as they counted down the release of the Songs of Innocence album together. Cook’s glee wasn’t contagious though, and the majority of the world treated its arrival like officially sanctioned malware, eventually forcing Apple to publish instructions on how to get rid of it. Thus, Apple’s proudest celebrity moment ended up being like Microsoft dealing with a security flaw in Internet Explorer.

Hopefully, this was suitably embarrassing for everyone involved. Because it may be the push the tech industry needs to stop throwing money (and themselves) at famous faces, in the misguided hope we care what they do, say, and think about a product or company. Why do Apple, and its peers, bother anymore? We know that 99 percent of the time, the endorsement is just business, but still they roll them out at every opportunity, thinking the sight of a rich guy with a free smartphone will make us rush out and buy one too.

It won’t. Most of the chosen celebrities are clueless about tech, rubbish at being ambassadors for the brand, or worse, so annoying I’d go out of my way not to buy the damn product. Get someone who we respect, or at least has something meaningful or insightful to tell us, and perhaps we’ll pay attention. Instead, Apple welcomed the deeply irritating Bono, similarly dreadful, and people like Dr. Oz (who?) and CoCo Lee (why?) at the iPhone 6 event.

Taking off the gloves

It’s not only Apple that’s guilty of getting cozy with celebrities. Samsung’s at it as well, through a program it calls the “White Glove,” which if an article published in Fast Company is anything to go by, should really be called Brown Glove, there’s so much ego-stroking going on. White Glove is all about giving Samsung hardware to people in the public eye — “influencers,” Samsung calls them — and getting them away from using the iPhone. If they’re subsequently photographed using a Samsung device, or go on to become “disciples,” then all the better.

Most of the chosen celebrities are clueless about tech, rubbish at being ambassadors for the brand, or worse.

Using well-connected PR experts in Hollywood, Samsung arranges secretive dinner parties, where it hands out the latest Galaxy phone or tablet to high-profile guests. Reps explain to their prey how to use it, and even come equipped with pre-programmed SIM cards, ensuring the hapless celeb can be converted on the spot. Those rumored to be part of Samsung’s cult include Jay Z, LeBron James, Ellen DeGeneres, Impractical Jokers’ Brian Quinn, and Adam Levine. You know, the people we all look to for advice on the latest tech.

It seems Samsung takes the same approach to its celebrity endorsements as it does with the actual devices: Churn ‘em out, and hope one of them is a success. However, Samsung execs are hopelessly naive if they think we can’t see through this shameless, promotional flatulence.

Worse still, not even stuffing free gadgets into the hands of “influencers” guarantees them any allegiance. All the above names have been found surreptitiously using an iPhone, or simply bad-mouthing their freebie or benefactor. Surely this makes it all a massive waste of everyone’s time?

Do people pay attention, or not?

According to Martin Lindstrom, author of a book called Buyology, it doesn’t matter if the celebrity endorser turns out to be a hypocrite. “The positive effect seems surprisingly stronger than the negative effect,” he told CNN. Getting the right face next to a product could help attract a certain age group too. A study carried out in Hong Kong of people aged between 13 and 19 found the more attractive, amusing and expressive an endorser was, the better the group recalled the product itself.

Campaigns featuring household names can work well, particularly when those doing the promoting are connected to the product. Samsung’s Milk Music may be a lesser known Spotify-style streaming music service, but the star-studded promo video has been viewed 25 million times in just over two months.

Apple can get it right too. British actor and well-known Apple fan Stephen Fry wrote an early review of the iPhone 6 so glowing, it could be used to brighten up the winter months in Norway. It attracted more than 1,300 comments, was shared to more than seven million Twitter followers, and is pinned to the top of his profile. That’s a lot of attention gained from just one man’s opinion. However, in a recent survey of 1,000 Americans, 96 percent of those polled didn’t have any interest in reading what celebrities had to say about a product. So Fry’s gushing may have fallen on deaf ears.

Marketing teams need to look beyond vapid celebs

Putting the latest piece of tech in the hands of someone even nominally famous won’t stop, but if it really has to go on, can companies choose people who may have at least a vague clue about tech? Who advertises shampoo and conditioner? It’s not Larry David, it’s Gisele. When Puma wanted to drench someone in their golf apparel, they chose Rickie Fowler, and not David Beckham.

Yes, smartphones have universal appeal, but does that have to mean they’re promoted by everyone from Zooey Deschanel to someone-whose-name-I-don’t-know from a cable reality show? Of course it doesn’t. It’s just a lack of creativity on the part of the companies, who’re wallowing around in the celeb cesspool with the rest of media-land, thinking we care about what these non-entities have to say. Oh, and Tim? Wheeling out an aging rocker, just because you like him, isn’t any better.

Why not get some new faces involved? People who’re on the front lines of tech reporting and broadcasting, or even up-and-coming app developers and entrepreneurs, seem like prime candidates. I’d much rather see passionate, knowledgeable, and best of all, relevant people endorsing a phone, than yet another paparrazi-snapped picture of what’s-her-name from that-show using a Galaxy Note 3.

Sure, they may end up becoming paid shills too. But at least they’d be relatable paid shills, and that’s more than we’ve got right now.

Editors' Recommendations

Andy Boxall
Andy is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends, where he concentrates on mobile technology, a subject he has written about for…
I’m a lifelong iPhone user. Here’s what I think about the Samsung Galaxy S24
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and S Pen stylus on its screen.

Samsung and Apple typically release new smartphones at different times of the year. Samsung usually does it early in the year, while Apple waits until the fall ahead of the holiday shopping season. As always, Apple tends to release new iPhones that outdo the ones Samsung released earlier, and then when the calendar changes, Samsung comes back with something to better compete with Apple, and so forth.

Samsung has recently announced its Galaxy S24 series, which has sparked the curiosity of iPhone owners like myself. Many of us are currently exploring the features of these phones and seeing which ones aren't available on our iPhones, myself included. Some are entirely new, while others have been introduced on previous Samsung Galaxy S models. Although many seem promising, some may not be as appealing to iPhone users. Here are a few of the Galaxy S24 features I like — and a few I don't.
Circle to Search looks impressive
Circle to Search Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Read more
You won’t believe how I improved my phone’s battery life
The back of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, resting against a post.

Galaxy S24 Ultra Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Sorry for using that tired old clickbait headline, but in a roundabout way, it’s true. You genuinely won’t believe that I’m about to tell you something so headbangingly obvious about smartphone batteries.

Read more
I want the iPhone 16 to steal these 6 Galaxy S24 features
The back of the yellow Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra.

Samsung’s January Unpacked event revealed the company's next-generation phones, the Galaxy S24 lineup. This includes the base model S24, the larger S24 Plus, and the top-of-the-line S24 Ultra.

The S24 lineup is powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chip and has a smattering of new AI features. Samsung also seems to have copied Apple by giving the S24 and S24 Plus a flat frame instead of the rounded one used previously, as well as a matte look. And, of course, the S24 Ultra getting a titanium frame just months after the iPhone 15 Pro isn't lost on anyone.

Read more