Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

The iPhone 14 Pro’s A16 chip comes with a huge hidden cost

When Apple launched the iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Pro lineups this year, one of the biggest differentiating factors between the two models was the silicon inside. Apple’s new A16 Bionic is exclusive to the iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max, while the iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Plus still use the last-gen A15 that debuted with the iPhone 13 series. The reasoning behind this decision comes down to the manufacturing price of the A16, which turns out to be more than twice the cost of the A15.

A teardown of the iPhone 14 devices was done by Nikkei Asia, which allowed the site to take a closer look at the various components of each part, such as the cameras and processors. According to Nikkei Asia’s findings, the production costs for the iPhone 14 Pro’s A16 chip are about 20% more expensive to make than the previous iteration, coming in at a total of $110. This is about 2.4 times more expensive than the A15 that debuted in the iPhone 13 series and is recycled in the standard iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Plus models.

An iPhone 14 pulled apart, revealing all of the components inside.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Overall, the iPhone 14 Pro Max production cost totals around $501 for Apple in terms of parts, which is $60 more than the previous iPhone 13 Pro Max. For Apple, this cost increase is rather steep, as costs have usually stayed between $400 to $450 since the iPhone XS Max launched back in 2018.

Recommended Videos

The reason for the higher costs is due to the fact that the A16 Bionic utilizes a 4-nanometer process from TSMC, a chip supplier, compared to the 5-nanometer process for the older A15 chip. But the higher costs aren’t just for the processors. In fact, the new camera components in the entire iPhone 14 lineup are also more expensive, including the Sony CMOS image sensors that are 30% larger than previous iterations and cost $15 — 50% more than before.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

Another possible explanation for the higher costs in production is due to most parts coming from U.S. suppliers, which make up about 32.4% of the cost, up 10% from the iPhone 13. Comparatively, South Korea was a top supplier in 2021, but the country’s share has dropped down to 24.8%, which is over five points.

The back of the iPhone 14 Pro Max.
Joe Maring/Digital Trends

Apple also raised the price of the iPhone 14 series in other countries, like the U.K., Japan, and Germany (to name a few) due to the strong value of the U.S. dollar. Because of these price hikes, the expensive production costs mean fewer profits for Apple.

Since the iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Plus are recycling the A15 chip from last year, some people may not see a reason to upgrade to either of these devices, though it makes sense from a business perspective (Apple is still a business, of course). After all, the iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max are using the newer and faster A16 Bionic, and have other great features like an always-on display, the Dynamic Island, and a 48-megapixel main camera — all of which make it more worth it for the price. But if you’re coming from an older iPhone, such as the iPhone X, then even the iPhone 14 with its last-gen A15 should still be an improvement.

Christine Romero-Chan
Christine Romero-Chan has been writing about technology, specifically Apple, for over a decade. She graduated from California…
Apple could be forced to make major changes to how your iPhone works
The back of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max.

Apple is facing yet another landmark push in Europe that could open some of the signature features of its ecosystem. The European Commission has today detailed a couple of broad interoperability measures that Apple must follow, in order to oblige with the Digital Markets Act (DMA) guidelines.
These measures cover a total of nine connectivity features available on iPhones, covering everything from smartwatches to headphones. The idea is to give developers access to the same set of advanced features — such as immersive notifications on watches and quick pairing for peripherals — that is locked to Apple’s own devices.
“The specification decisions are legally binding,” says the regulatory body, adding that interoperability is “key to opening up new possibilities for third parties to develop innovative products and services on Apple's gatekeeper platforms.”

Hello, AirDrop alternatives!

Read more
I’ve used the iPhone 16 Pro Max for 6 months. Here’s why I love it
The back of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max.

I bought the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max when it was announced and have used it every day since then, racking up six months of use, and yet I’ve written very little about it. It’s time to change that, explain why it is technically my only “permanent” phone, and why I think it’s superb.
How I use my iPhone

I have two SIM cards. One is my “main” SIM card which is attached to the phone number I use, and the other is all about data, and they both live in different phones. My main SIM is switched in and out of review Android phones all the time, while the SIM I use mostly for data only lives in my Apple iPhone. They’re both always with me, and since September 2024 I’ve used the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max alongside whatever Android phone I’m reviewing.

Read more
Apple might serve a massive front camera upgrade on iPhone 17
An iPhone 16 laying on a shelf with its screen on.

The domain of Apple leaks is currently obsessed with the controversial iPhone 17 Pro design refresh, which could stir some heated debate with its massive camera hump. A lot of chatter is also focused on the svelte iPhone 17 Air. Yet, it seems there are a few other internal upgrades worth getting excited about.
According to analyst Jeff Pu, Apple will equip all four iPhone 17 series models with an upgraded 24-megapixel front camera. So far, Apple has stuck with a 12-megapixel selfie snapper on its mainline iPhones. Moreover, the company hasn’t ever deployed a 24-megapixel camera sensor, keeping its experiments limited to 12-megapixel and 48-megapixel units in the past few years.
The research note by Pu, which was seen by MacRumors and 9to5Mac, doesn’t go into details about the specifications or feature details of the new 24-megapixel front snapper on the iPhone 17 series. However, we can take an educated guess, based on what Apple accomplished when it switched from 12-megapixel to 48-megapixel rear cameras.

A 24-megapixel sensor will most likely default to pixel-binning for delivering pictures and videos at a lower resolution than the native pixel count. Pixel-binning essentially combines the light data collected by adjacent pixels, creating what is colloquially known as a super-pixel.
The sum total of these efforts are pictures that are more detailed and with more realistic color rendering, especially in low-light scenarios. Depending on how the pixels are combined, the final image is usually a lower-resolution shot, but more pleasing to look at.
For example, the iPhone 16 Pro’s 48-megapixel main camera does 4-in-1 pixel binning to produce 12-megapixel pictures, but you can still stick full-res 48-megapixel shots, too. There’s also an intermediary option to to get the best of both worlds with 24-megapixel clicks.
With a 24-megapixel selfie camera coming into the picture, iPhone 17 buyers can expect improved selfies and better-quality video calls. Moreover, since there are more pixels to collect light data, Apple might leverage it to offer more advanced camera features, too.

Read more