Skip to main content

If this Apple Watch Ultra 2 leak is true, I already don’t want it

For years, rumors circulated that Apple was working on a more rugged Apple Watch, and in 2022, we finally got it in the form of the Apple Watch Ultra. Simply put, it’s one of the best smartwatches you can buy in 2023.

But there’s one caveat that won’t appeal to everyone, aside from the aesthetics: the fact that this is a chonky boi. Yes, the Apple Watch Ultra is the biggest Apple Watch that Apple offers, coming in the form of a large 49mm case size with a 1.93-inch display. And according to the latest Apple Watch Ultra rumor from DigiTimes, the next iteration of it could get about 10% bigger in 2024, which would mean a screen size of about 2.1 inches. Though I’m sure plenty of people are excited about more screen estate on their wrist, I’m not a fan.

Recommended Videos

What about those of us with small wrists?

Apple Black Unity watch band with Unity Mosaic watch face
Christine Romero-Chan / Digital Trends

I’ve used the Apple Watch ever since the original Series 0. Though I don’t upgrade my smartwatch every year like I do my iPhone, I have gone through a few different models over the years. Each time I get a new Apple Watch, I always opt for the smaller model — not because it’s less money (that’s a plus, though), but because I have small wrists.

Right now, I’m currently still using my old Apple Watch Series 5 (that Space Black titanium has held up very well). It’s the 40mm version, and I personally think it’s a perfect size for my wrist. It doesn’t look too clunky or too big on me, and I still get all the information I need on the display.

Apple Watch Series 5 40mm compared to Apple Watch Series 7 45mm on wrists
Christine Romero-Chan / Digital Trends

Last year for Father’s Day, I bought my husband an Apple Watch Series 7 in the 45mm size. When I compare my watch to his, I’m always a little surprised at how much of a difference the larger sizes make — and how I’m glad that I didn’t go that route. As much as I would love having a larger display to view things, I know that it would look clunky on my wrist, and definitely not as “feminine” as I’d like it to be.

I personally like how the Apple Watch Ultra looks, and I like the extra features that it has, despite the fact that I’m not an extreme athlete or anything close to it. I would love an Apple Watch with 36 hours of battery life, or even an extra Action Button to make it easier to access a shortcut on my watch. But I can’t get over how large it is — the thing would probably be hanging over the edges of my wrist!

Though my primary use of my Apple Watch is to track my health and daily activity, I’ve also taken a liking to accessorizing and dressing it up for special occasions or events (I have some Disney-themed bands and even watch covers from a small indie shop). Because of this, I do care a little bit more about how my Apple Watch looks aesthetically, and with my small wrist, I can’t bring myself to get a size that just doesn’t fit properly or looks too big on me.

The Apple Watch Ultra doesn’t need to be bigger

The Apple Watch Ultra with the Apple Watch Series 8 and Watch SE 2.
The Apple Watch SE 2 (from left), Apple Watch Series 8, and Apple Watch Ultra Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

According to this DigiTimes report, Apple plans to transition to micro-LED displays on most of its products, and it may be starting that transition with the Apple Watch Ultra. However, the big unknown is how Apple will achieve this: will it be the bezels or the casing that gets reduced in size? Both are pretty large in the first-generation Apple Watch Ultra.

Take a look at the Apple Watch Ultra right now, and you’ll find the biggest bezels out of all current Apple Watch models, including the Apple Watch Series 8 and Apple Watch SE 2. If the bezels get reduced, that would mean a larger screen, but the casing could also be smaller. The casing is large because of the toughness and durability of the design. If Apple could find a way to reduce the size of the casing while still retaining the durability of it, the screen could still be slightly “larger” without looking like a monstrosity.

I really just want to see Apple make a smaller size for the Apple Watch Ultra, more akin to the sizes offered for the regular, mainline Apple Watches. I would love to get an Apple Watch Ultra, but the current 49mm size is just way too big for me, unfortunately. And I’m not a fan of how the best Apple Watch features are only accessible via a single-size wearable.

Come on, Apple. Let me give you money for a small-size Apple Watch Ultra — especially if you throw blood glucose monitoring on it one day. Please.

Christine Romero-Chan
Christine Romero-Chan has been writing about technology, specifically Apple, for over a decade. She graduated from California…
watchOS 12 / watchOS 26: everything you need to know
The next major update for Apple Watch devices is almost upon us, and its name could change quite significantly
The Apple Watch SE 2 with the Apple Watch Series 10.

One of the great things about modern smart devices is that they’re gifts that keep giving, thanks to their frequent software updates. Whether it’s a phone, a watch, or even a TV, chances are the device you’re using today isn’t quite the same as the one you bought three or four years ago.

That’s equally true for the Apple Watch. When Apple releases its watchOS 12 / watchOS 26 update, many Apple Watch owners will have an even more powerful wearable than the one they originally purchased.

Read more
The Apple Watch badly needs the iPhone 16e treatment
A person wearing the Apple Watch SE 2.

Apple isn’t very quick to update its lower cost products, but there’s one model which badly needs its attention: the Apple Watch SE. The company’s willingness to let the SE languish for several years is now affecting its bottom line, and when the Apple Watch Series 11 arrives later this year, an Apple Watch SE 3 needs to be there alongside it.
Hitting where it hurts

In 2024 shipments of Apple Watch models declined by 19% compared to 2023, according to Counterpoint Research, and a quote in the report stated, “The slowdown of the existing Apple Watch SE lineup and the lack of new SE models contributed to the decline.” While the entire smartwatch industry slowed over the same period, Apple saw the largest fall in shipments, which points to something being awry with its current product range.

Read more
Apple says iPhone 16e users don’t care about MagSafe — they’re probably right
A group of iPhone 16e phones arranged in a pattern.

The iPhone 16e launches today, and the first reviews are starting to appear online. One review that caught my attention was from John Gruber at Daring Fireball. The lengthy review has some information he picked up from Apple officials on why the company elected not to include MagSafe for wireless charging on the iPhone 16e. The reason is almost certainly on the mark and isn't all about saving money.

As we’ve already noted, Apple’s latest budget phone shares many features with the iPhone 16. However, the iPhone 16e is priced $200 lower. As a result, some features present in the iPhone 16 are omitted from the iPhone 16e, with MagSafe being one of them.

Read more