Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Mobile
  3. News

Don’t subscribe to the Times, just pay per article with Blendle

Lulu Chang
By

blendle pay per article blendlekiosk
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Pay-per-view has come to a publication near you, and it’s all thanks to Dutch startup Blendle. Banking on the notion that no one actually wants to read the whole New York Times, or the entirety of the Wall Street Journal, Blendle instead allows you to pay on an article-by-article basis.

And apparently, no one has told the firm (or its users) how easy it is to make your way around the 10-article-per-month limit, because the app now boasts one million signups after just two years of existence.

Recommended Videos

Think of Blendle as the iTunes of journalism — for just a few cents, you’ll be able to read individual news articles from a wide range of supported publishers. And while that may not be an attractive option in and of itself, the real draw of the platform may be in its ad-free interface. So if you’re tired of having your reading experience interrupted by an ad that seems longer than the piece itself, this may be something of a solution. At least, it is for the “hundreds of thousands” of monthly active users Blendle now has.

Related

Even more compelling is Bendle’s offer of a refund should you finish the article and be dissatisfied with its quality. According to the company, this money-back potential will encourage writers to create better content, prioritizing quality over quantity and refraining from clickbait-esque headlines. Already, Blendle co-founder Alexander Klöpping says, the company has refunded readers for around 10 percent of purchased articles (which seems like a rather high proportion).

The firm’s initial U.S. launch took place back in March, and included partnerships with some major players in the media space, including the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Financial Times. Each article from newspapers costs readers between 19 and 39 cents, while magazine participants such as Time, New York Magazine, and Mother Jones charge between 9 and 49 cents.

“We feel very strongly that consequential journalism is worth paying for, and that there is a strong need for more innovation in digital media to give consumers more options for directly supporting quality publishers,” said World Politics Review founder Hampton Stephens upon Blendle’s U.S. expansion. “Blendle is leading the way in proving that micro-payments can be an important part of publishers’ revenue mix, and we are excited to play a role in helping them bring their innovative platform to the U.S. market.”

At this point, TechCrunch reports, Blendle’s business has grown 300 percent over the last year, and the app projects that its burgeoning reader base will have consumed some 20 million articles by the end of 2016.

Updated on 8-12-2016: Blendle hits 1 million signups.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Lulu Chang
Lulu Chang
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Don’t buy the Google Pixel Fold (yet)
The Google Pixel Fold in someone's pocket.

Just like you, I’m excited about the Google Pixel Fold, but I’m going to urge caution. Take a minute — no — take weeks before deciding to put down $1,800 of your money and begin the long, anticipation-filled wait by the door until it arrives.

By far, the most sensible, mature, and financially conscious course of action is to not buy the Pixel Fold just yet. Why? I’ve got three big reasons why you should hold off on buying the Pixel Fold.
Reason No. 1: The Pixel Fold is untested

Read more
Casio’s newest watch fixes the thing most people don’t like about G-Shocks
The Casio G-Shock DW-H5600's screen.

Following on from the G-Shock GBD-H2000 hybrid sports smartwatch, Casio has announced the DW-H5600 hybrid, which takes much of what we liked about the H2000 and puts it inside the classic square G-Shock case. This makes it a lot more wearable, as not only is the case slimmer and less wide, but the watch is also a lot lighter at 59 grams.

Like the GBD-H2000, the H5600 uses Polar’s algorithms for its health and fitness tracking features, which now include running, walking, gym workouts, and interval training too. The heart rate sensor on the back of the watch monitors both heart rate and blood oxygen levels, plus it’s suitable for sleep tracking too. This is where the H5600 makes sense, as the H2000 is too bulky to be worn comfortably overnight.

Read more
I replaced my Apple Watch with a Garmin — and I don’t want to go back
Apple Watch Series 7 next to the Garmin Forerunner 265.

The Apple Watch has been my go-to wearable for years. I began my journey with the Apple Watch Series 1 in 2017, upgraded to the Apple Watch Series 4 shortly after it launched, and then jumped to the Apple Watch Series 7 in 2021. It's long been my smartwatch platform of choice, and I've never had any desire to switch to something else.

At least, that's what I thought before I began using a Garmin smartwatch. I started testing the Garmin Forerunner 265 earlier this year, and I went into it with a pretty clear plan: I'd wear the watch for a couple of weeks, write my review, and move back to the Apple Watch. Fast forward to now, and my Garmin Forerunner 265 review has been published, no further testing is required, and nothing is stopping me from returning to my Apple Watch. But here's the thing — I don't want to. Garmin's watch is so good that I have no desire to put the Apple Watch back on my wrist, and there are a few big reasons why.
The surprising importance of buttons

Read more