Skip to main content

A phone you never heard of just beat the Pixel 7 Pro in an unusual camera test

Two new phones are doing something different with their cameras to create a stronger, more versatile depth of field effect, where the background is blurred around a subject. It’s a complicated technical endeavor on a phone, as to replicate the effect naturally, it normally requires a DSLR camera with a large sensor and manually adjustable aperture.

But is the new system any good? We’ve put the Huawei Mate 50 Pro and the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro, with their fancy apertures, against the Apple iPhone 14 Pro and the Google Pixel 7 Pro to see if the clever camera systems really can create a better natural bokeh effect.

The phones and the cameras

Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

Although both the iPhone 14 Pro and the Pixel 7 Pro have fantastic cameras, they’re what could be considered “conventional” on a phone. The Phantom X2 Pro and the Mate 50 Pro aren’t so conventional, as both have cameras that do something very different from the ones on the Apple and Google phones.

The Huawei Mate 50 Pro has a manually adjustable aperture, where you can vary the main camera’s aperture using a slider control in the app between f/2.0 and f/4.0. The Tecno Phantom X2 Pro has a pop-out portrait camera with a large f/1.49 aperture that’s ready to take photos with a deep, natural depth of field.

To use the Tecno pop-out camera, you just select the 2.5x zoom mode in the camera app, but the Mate 50 Pro’s adjustable aperture works more like a Pro mode. When you select Aperture mode, a slider appears to vary the physical aperture between f/2.0 and f/4.0, and between f/1.4 and f/2.0 using the virtual aperture. You can also adjust the zoom level up to 3x to emphasize the effect.

Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

Huawei’s system is far more complex than Tecno’s, and it really needs an understanding of how an aperture works and the effect it has on your photos. If you don’t know, then it requires some experimentation. To use Tecno’s special portrait lens, you just tap a button — it’s really that easy. Neither the iPhone nor the Pixel have these custom lenses, so you either have to rely on the main camera to create a bokeh effect, or resort to the digital portrait mode.

How we took the photos you’re about to see

Before we look at the photos, there are a few things to know. Most of the photos taken with the iPhone and the Pixel 7 Pro were shot using the optical zoom modes, which emphasizes the depth of field effect. This made them all easier to compare. The Tecno’s photos are all shot at 2.5x, as this is when the Portrait Camera pops out of the phone, while the Mate 50 Pro’s photos were shot using 1x or 3x zoom in the camera app.

Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

If we used the iPhone and Pixel at 1x, there’s hardly any depth of field effect at all, unless the environment and subject are exactly right. We didn’t use an artificial portrait mode in any of these photos and stuck to the physical aperture mode in the Mate 50 Pro’s camera app too. In most circumstances, we used tap-to-focus to identify the focal point of the shot. Photos have been resized before uploading to make for friendlier online viewing.

Photo 1: Porsche script

For this photo, the focal point was the letter S in Porsche, and we’re looking for it to be in focus with a gradient appearing on either side of it. In other words, it should be sharp, and what’s around it should gradually blur out as you get to the edge of the photo. You can see the Tecno and the Pixel phone heavily blur the script both near and far from the camera lens, but the iPhone and the Mate 50 Pro treat it more subtly.

The car is black, and while there is a lot of reflection, it’s only the iPhone and the Pixel that truly show the car’s color, with the Tecno giving the finish a gray/blue tint, and the Mate 50 Pro slightly lacking the depth of the black in the iPhone and Pixel’s photo. The Pixel gets the required depth of field and the color exactly right, but the Tecno’s beautiful blur makes it a very close second.

Winner: Google Pixel 7 Pro

Photo 2: G-Shock watch

Here’s where the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro’s simplicity and superb sharpness come into play. Zoom in on the watch itself, and the Phantom X2 Pro’s photo is by far the sharpest and the one with the best focus. The other three were taken at similar zoom levels, and it’s obvious where the digital zoom effects have spoiled the shots. What also makes the X2 Pro’s photo notable is that all it took to get it was to press the shutter button.

It’s this simplicity combined with the excellent end result that makes Tecno’s camera so exciting. The photo taken with the other phones could possibly have been improved with trial and error, but with the Phantom, there’s no need. It just took the photo we wanted straightaway. It’s not perfect, though, as there’s still a gray/blue tint visible in the background compared to the iPhone and the Pixel.

Winner: Tecno Phantom X2 Pro

Photo 3: Frosty spider’s web

The center of the web was the focal point for this photo, and you can see where the iPhone 14 Pro struggles to create the true depth of field effect demonstrated in the other photos. It’s certainly not a bad photo, but compare it to the Phantom X2 Pro’s image, and there is a pronounced difference in the bokeh effect. The Tecno, Huawei, and Google photos more effectively draw your eye to the web, an advantage of taking photos with a strong depth of field.

Using the Mate 50 Pro’s manually adjustable aperture allowed me to get the focus just right, and the strong blur in the background looks great. The Phantom X2 Pro’s effect is a little too strong for this particular image, but the color balance is far better than it usually is. The Pixel 7 Pro’s photo is subdued, and can’t quite match the Huawei phone’s great photo.

Winner: Huawei Mate 50 Pro

Photo 4: Car headlight

Rather than only shooting subjects close-up, where the depth of field can be forced, what about larger objects a little farther away? The headlight on the car was the focal point, and ideally, there should be some blur in the foreground and the background. Again, the Tecno phone achieves this, and the focus is super sharp around the edges, although it’s not quite as precise in its isolation as the Pixel 7 Pro. However, to achieve this, the Pixel had to get much closer.

The iPhone and the Huawei phone perform similarly, although the iPhone’s color balance is spot-on in comparison to the blue tint visible in Huawei’s photo. The Pixel 7 Pro and Phantom X2 Pro get the effect I want, and while the Pixel’s color balance is wonderful, the Tecno phone shoots from further away for a wider view, and it’s an effect the other phones couldn’t quite match.

Winner: Tecno Phantom X2 Pro

Photo 5: Coffee cup

We’ll end with a classic depth-of-field photo, where a cup is the focal point, and the background needs to be blurred out. The Tecno Phantom X2 Pro’s versatility came through here, as it could take the “same” photo at this distance, closer, or even further away. It’s superb at getting the depth-of-field look.

All four photos look great, but the iPhone 14 Pro’s excellent white balance and fine detail shine through for the first time, with crisp white frost, and natural colors on the cup itself. The Phantom X2 Pro comes close, and really does take a fantastic photo, as does the Mate 50 Pro. The Pixel’s white balance isn’t as good as the rest. The Tecno Phantom X2 Pro’s ability to take this same image in a variety of different ways makes it the winner, though.

Winner: Tecno Phantom X2 Pro

Why a phone you’ve never heard of is the winner

The Tecno Phantom X2 Pro has won three of five categories, making it the overall winner. The Google Pixel 7 Pro won one, as did the Huawei Mate 50 Pro, while the iPhone 14 Pro didn’t quite manage a win this time. It means a phone you’ve probably never heard of has beaten what’s acknowledged to be one of the best camera phones you can buy — so how did this happen?

The dedicated portrait camera on the back of the Phantom X2 Pro is unique, and for once, it’s not a gimmick; it really does do something fun and different that you’d want to use on a regular basis. It’s versatile as it doesn’t only work close-up, where the depth of field is easier to create, but also at further distances — and it hasn’t failed to produce a sharp, well-focused photo. It was so easy to take these photos compared to doing so on all three of the others, with no shifting around or trying different zoom lengths needed. It’s a huge surprise and has made me pay attention to Tecno as an innovator to watch.

iPhone 14 Pro and Pixel 7 Pro camera modules.
Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

It’s certainly not perfect, though, and the software tuning lets the portrait camera down. It affects the whole camera, as I found out when I tried the Phantom X2 Pro in more detail, and just goes to show the importance of getting the software right in order to take advantage of the hardware.

Huawei gets the tuning right, and although the bokeh effect is effective, the way you have to interact with the feature is off-putting. It requires more experimentation, and more photographic knowledge than many will find necessary on a phone.

Finally, the Pixel 7 Pro continues to impress. It’s really superb at taking photos in all environments, with little effort, and then capturing the scene in the way you imagined. It’s by far the best all-rounder here, even beating the always-reliable iPhone 14 Pro. Even though it has won, we’re not saying you should import the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro (the rest of the phone isn’t quite as exciting as the camera), but it’s great to see a relatively unknown brand do something interesting and successful with the camera for a change.

Editors' Recommendations

Andy Boxall
Andy is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends, where he concentrates on mobile technology, a subject he has written about for…
I finally figured out why I don’t love the iPhone 14 Pro’s camera
A close-up of the iPhone 14 Pro's camera module.

My iPhone 14 Pro and its camera have been with me for almost a year now, but as I looked for photos to share in this retrospective about the camera’s ability, it became clear I hadn’t used it to capture many truly important moments.

It struck me as odd. After all, it’s a good camera, and the results when I do use it are often superb. Plus, I've loved iPhone cameras in the past, so why don’t I always reach for it every time I want to take a great photo? I think I've finally figured out the reasons why.
When the iPhone 14 Pro gets it right

Read more
I tried to replace my GoPro with this new phone and its clever camera
The Asus Zenfone 10, along with the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, Apple iPhone 14 Pro, and the GoPro Hero 11 Black.

The Asus Zenfone 10's camera is attached to a gimbal, and with it comes the promise of shooting steady, shake-free video even when you’re moving around.

Does this mean it can take on the mighty GoPro, and perhaps mean you only need to carry around one device instead of two? To find out, we put the Zenfone 10 against the latest GoPro camera and two of its smartphone peers.
Understanding the Zenfone 10’s gimbal
The gimbal can be seen working in the viewfinder Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

Read more
I’ve used an iPhone for 14 years. The Pixel Fold made me want to stop
Google Pixel Fold in Obsidian open on Pixar Pier portrait mode.

When Steve Jobs took the stage on January 9, 2007, to unveil the original iPhone, everyone was amazed at the little piece of technology he held in his hand. Then in June 2007, people could buy and get their hands on the very first iPhone — and the scope of the cell phone industry changed forever.

I personally didn't get the original iPhone on launch day, believe it or not. Instead, I received it as a birthday present in 2008 (my very first Apple product), but my clumsy self eventually dropped it on cement four months later, and the screen shattered. But instead of getting it fixed, I figured I might as well just get the iPhone 3G since it was just a few weeks away from release.

Read more