Skip to main content

Court: Apple must replace Danish man's iPhone with a new, not refurbished, model

David Lysgaard of Denmark emerged victorious in a court battle against Apple, but this case has nothing to do with patents and everything to do with how Apple conducts its business when it comes to replacing devices, reports MacRumors.

According to Apple’s warranty and AppleCare policies, any repairs or exchanges might involve devices that are either new or “equivalent to new in performance and reliability,” the latter of which is often defined as refurbished. These refurbished models are likely to contain new and recycled parts, something that Lysgaard and the Danish court that handed down its decision against Apple took issue with.

Recommended Videos

According to the court, the refurbished iPhone 4 that served as Lysgaard’s replacement handset might have a lower resale value, since it might contain recycled parts. Furthermore, the court saw the replacement phone as going against Lysgaard’s “legitimate expectation” of getting a new iPhone equivalent to his original purchase.

The Danish court concluded that the refurbished iPhone was not an “equivalent to new” replacement, thus violating the Danish Sale of Goods Act. As such, Apple was ordered to replace Lysgaard’s phone with a new model. The decision upholds an earlier decision by Denmark’s Consumer Complaints Board, which concluded that the replacement phone should be new, not refurbished.

As for what is next, Apple can appeal the decision with a higher court, but the case potentially includes larger implications for Apple’s business. Apple likely uses recycled parts as a means of lowering the stress on its supply chain by not manufacturing new devices as replacements. As such, the case could change out how the company handles repairs moving forward.

It will likely take more cases to incite a policy change, though a Dutch court arrived at a similar decision with a similar case in July. In the same month, two California residents sued Apple over receiving refurbished devices.

Williams Pelegrin
Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…
The iPhone 17 Pro Max could pack a curious battery update
A vapor chamber cooling system might point to a new level of performance
The back of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max.

The iPhone 17 launch is (almost certainly) fast approaching, and while the iPhone 17 Air is the phone getting the most coverage, a new rumor has emerged about another Apple device that’s intrigued me.

The word on the virtual street is that the iPhone 17 Pro (and Pro Max) are going to get a vapor cooling chamber, which would reduce heat from the phone in a new (and presumably more efficient) way.

Read more
Adobe made the best iPhone camera app you haven’t tried yet, and it’s free
Indigo camera core controls.

A year ago, a rather interesting camera tool came out from the house of Lux, makers of the fantastic Kino and Halide apps. The tool is called Process Zero, which essentially ripped the images of Apple’s computational adjustments and delivered a pristine photo. 

I even compared the current-gen iPhone with the iPhone 6s and realized the ills of computational photography. What I noticed repeatedly was that algorithmic processing makes the photos look sharper and more colorful, but they aren’t always accurate. And in doing so, they lose their natural charm. 

Read more
This one iPadOS 26 feature has me excited for the iPhone Fold
Semi-open state of a foldable iPhone concept

Samsung is set to launch the seventh generation of its Galaxy Z Fold book-style folding phone this Summer, but its biggest rival is yet to show its folding phone hand. Apple has long been expected to unveil an iPhone Fold, and the latest rumors suggest that it will launch next year.

I’ve used almost every folding phone released globally, with some exceptions for extremely obscure ones. While I've always been curious what an iPhone Fold would look like, I was fairly certain that Apple shouldn't build it, as I wasn’t sure they could deliver on one necessary feature.

Read more