Skip to main content

E-book readers chew through more books, still enjoy paper copies

The RoadA study from research firm iModerate Research Technologies finds that consumers with e-reading devices not only read more, but have also read more traditional print books.

IModerate surveyed over 300 multi-function device owners (meaning e-readers like the Kindle and Nook don’t count) and found that these users preferred reading on their iPads, iPhones, BlackBerrys and the like based on convenience, the backlit screen, and purchasing ease.

Unsurprisingly, the reason for increased user reading is access. Anyone who owns a smartphone or tablets generally had it on his or her person at all times, so formerly vacant moments are being replaced with reading.

What’s more interesting is that e-readers aren’t the death sentence some print publishers might think they are. According to the study, 46 percent of participants said they were inspired to read more books in print after reading e-books. “Reading e-books are [sic] convenient and easier on the go, but I still really enjoy a real book,” one participant said. Somebody should tell Microcosm Publishing: the Portland bookstore announced earlier this month it would offer customers a Kindle’s worth in print books. That’s right, if you relinquish the e-reader you can take home $139-$189 of the real, physical thing. According to the store, “Why let fad technology kill print when you can take a stand and fill up your shelves in the process.” Truly voracious readers will keep buying print even if they own a soul-sucking Kindle, but at the current ratio of print to e-book purchasing, traditional bookstores’ drastic (mildly crazed) measures could be justified.

The study also clarified that there are two different types of e-readers and how multi-function devices have affected them. There are those who purchased their device at least partially for reading purposes: These people tend to be active to heavy readers who wanted more accessibility to books. These people actively seek out time to use their e-readers, and the devices end up saving them money from buy print copies. Then there are those who are “renewed readers.” These people “discovered” the e-reader function of their device and have begun reading more because of it and will continue to.

Editors' Recommendations

Molly McHugh
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more