When Facebook purchased super-photo-app Instagram for $1 billion early last month, one of the first thoughts on many users minds was, “Great, maybe Facebook’s mobile apps won’t suck so much anymore.” But a interesting new amendment to the social network’s S-1 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission has me wondering: Are Facebook’s mobile apps intentionally bad?
Here is what Facebook wrote in its updated S-1 (a document required of any company that is preparing to go public):
We do not currently directly generate any meaningful revenue from the use of Facebook mobile products, and our ability to do so successfully is unproven. We believe this increased usage of Facebook on mobile devices has contributed to the recent trend of our daily active users (DAUs) increasing more rapidly than the increase in the number of ads delivered. If users increasingly access Facebook mobile products as a substitute for access through personal computers, and if we are unable to successfully implement monetization strategies for our mobile users, or if we incur excessive expenses in this effort, our financial performance and ability to grow revenue would be negatively affected. [Emphasis mine]
In other words, Facebook hasn’t yet figured out a way to make money from mobile, which appears to have given the company little incentive to improve their mobile apps thus far. (Why make mobile more attractive to users if doing so hurts business?) After all, Facebook has not had any problem growing to more than 900 million monthly active users by sticking primarily to its browser-based platform.
And yet, despite Facebook’s seeming neglect of the mobile space, more and more users continue to access the social network via their mobile devices — that’s what the company believes is behind its surge to more than 500 million daily users. With users flocking to its mobile platform anyway, Facebook is in a bit of a predicament: Master mobile, or suffer the consequences.
This little tidbit puts the Instagram (and Glancee) acquisition into perspective. Facebook’s financial success is becoming increasingly dependent on the company’s ability to better occupy the mobile space. Failure to do so means less money in the company’s (and soon, shareholders’) pockets. With the talented team from Instagram — an entirely app-based social network which, incidentally, also doesn’t make money from mobile ads — perhaps Facebook can finally crack the mobile revenue-generating code.
At this point, it doesn’t appear as though Facebook has a choice.
- Facebook use has already dropped 50 million hours — but no biggie, it says
- Desktop users could soon post to Facebook Stories in their browser
- Google will ban cryptocurrency ads from its AdWords network in June
- Social Feed: Fire department saves kid on Facebook; YouTube’s latest gaffe
- What does Grindr’s acquisition by a Chinese company mean for users?