Skip to main content

FCC chairman’s Net neutrality revisions may not be enough to silence dissent

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler has reportedly backed down from his agency’s broadband Internet regulation proposals, introducing a new draft that promises stronger scrutiny to keep ISPs from discriminating against companies that can’t afford to pay for Internet “fast lanes.”  

According to the Wall Street Journal, Wheeler assured the public that he would not allow broadband companies to segregate Internet traffic into slow and fast lanes. While the development may be a positive sign for Net neutrality advocates, it isn’t a complete turnaround, and may fall short of satisfying critics.

Recommended Videos

 The new draft still allows broadband companies to charge more for faster delivery of content. The only difference is the language. According to an unnamed official, the FCC will scrutinize deals between broadband and content providers to make sure that nonpaying companies don’t get unfair treatment.  

While the agency’s promises probably wouldn’t be enough to quell dissent, there are aspects to the new draft that may be taken as a positive sign by Net neutrality advocates. The unnamed official said that the new proposals would seek comments on whether to ban “paid prioritization.” The draft will also ask for comments on whether to consider broadband Internet providers as a public utility, which would allow the FCC to regulate the industry. 

In a blog post on the Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society website, experts said that while giving the public a chance to comment on paid prioritization is a step in the right direction, the draft is just a rehash of the same bad rules. 

“Though we haven’t yet seen the FCC’s proposal, it seems that the Chairman is considering requiring ISPs to offer a baseline level of service to applications, content, and services that don’t pay up. So instead of an Internet with a slow lane and a fast lane, the new proposal might result in an Internet that offers a “not-so-fast, but not totally crappy lane” to applications that don’t pay and a “faster lane” to those that do,” the blog post read. “Internet companies that pay so that their traffic is faster or is not counted against the bandwidth cap have a competitive advantage. This is one of the key policy problems with access fees. Simply improving the quality of the baseline service does not remove that problem, because the quality differential between paying and non-paying applications remains.”

The new proposed rules come as Wheeler faces a revolt within his own agency. Last week, FCC commissioners Ajit Pai and Jessica Rosenworcel called for a delay on the March 15 vote on the proposal. In the Wall Street Journal article, an unnamed FCC official was quoted as saying: “There is a wide feeling on the eighth floor that this is a debacle and I think people would like to see a change of course … We may not agree on the course, but we agree the road we’re on is to disaster.” 

While your comments won’t have as much weight as an FCC commissioner, it still counts. So if you want to add your comments on this issue, you can shoot an email to the FCC’s new inbox at openinternet@fcc.gov.

 
Christian Brazil Bautista
Christian Brazil Bautista is an experienced journalist who has been writing about technology and music for the past decade…
This one iPadOS 26 feature has me excited for the iPhone Fold
Semi-open state of a foldable iPhone concept

Samsung is set to launch the seventh generation of its Galaxy Z Fold book-style folding phone this Summer, but its biggest rival is yet to show its folding phone hand. Apple has long been expected to unveil an iPhone Fold, and the latest rumors suggest that it will launch next year.

I’ve used almost every folding phone released globally, with some exceptions for extremely obscure ones. While I've always been curious what an iPhone Fold would look like, I was fairly certain that Apple shouldn't build it, as I wasn’t sure they could deliver on one necessary feature.

Read more
These are the 4 best alternatives to the Google Pixel 9a
A person taking the Google Pixel 9a out of a pocket.

The best cheap phone race has been reignited by the Google Pixel 9a, which brings the Google Pixel 9 series experience at a significantly lower price. Starting at $449, Google’s latest Pixel offers the flagship processor of its siblings for flagship-level performance, an excellent camera, and long-term software support.

Yet, Google’s software experience won’t be for everyone; there are obvious tradeoffs in the specs sheet to enable the low price; the camera bar design is somewhat polarizing for long-term fans, and there’s no telephoto camera. 

Read more
Apple and Samsung rivalling phones, earbuds and more due at huge July event
The OnePlus Summer Launch Event has five new products, including the Nord 5 and Pad 3 Lite
Five OnePlus products launching in July 2025

OnePlus has confirmed it will host a bumper launch event on July 8, where it will announce five new products, covering phones, headphones, wearables and tablets.

The range of new devices will join the OnePlus 13, OnePlus 13R and OnePlus Pad 3 which arrived earlier this year as the Chinese firm fills out its product offering to compete against Apple, Samsung and co.

Read more