Skip to main content

The FTC is suing AT&T for throttling customers with unlimited data

Bald-faced attempts by wireless carriers to move customers off unlimited data plans are nothing new, but apparently the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) isn’t taking them lying down. This afternoon, the department announced that it’s suing AT&T for throttling subscribers in an “unfair or deceptive manner.”

The FTC, which worked closely with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on the case, alleges that AT&T didn’t clearly articulate its throttling policy in marketing materials. The carrier importantly failed to impart the implications to customers who renewed their contracts, violating the FTC Act when it charged those who canceled their contracts after seeing reduced speeds.

Recommended Videos

Related: AT&T loses unlimited data throttling case, forced to pay iPhone owner $935

AT&T made a more egregious transgression in the seemingly arbitrary way it reduced bandwidth. The FTC estimates that roughly 3.5 million customers were impacted more than 25 million times over several years, many without notice or explanation. Their speed was repeatedly cut to dial-up levels on an average of 12 days out of the month, making services like Web browsing, GPS navigation, and video streaming nearly impossible to use.

Wayne Watts, AT&T’s top lawyer, dismissed the FTC’s allegations in a statement. “It’s baffling as to why the FTC would choose to take this action against a company that, like all major wireless providers, manages its network resources to provide the best possible service to all customers,” he wrote.

Prior to a policy revision that took effect in March of 2012, AT&T purported to throttle only the “top 5 percent of users.” That doesn’t appear to have been the case; the FTC notes that reductions in speed occurred regardless of network congestion, after as little as 2GB of usage. The carrier’s current policy states that customers with unlimited data will see reduced speeds after using 3GB of data on 3G, or 5GB of data on LTE, in a month.

Subscribers complained to AT&T by the thousands about slow speeds, and the carrier’s own internal research showed that consumers perceived the throttling practices as a “bait and switch.”

Related: Verizon tells FCC that data throttling is necessary to keep the network going

The FTC’s lawsuit marks the second time a federal agency has chastised a major wireless carrier for dishonest “network optimization” policies. Earlier this month, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler sent Verizon a strongly-worded letter regarding the carrier’s stated intention to begin throttling high users of unlimited 4G LTE data on heavily trafficked cell cites. “It is disturbing to me that Verizon Wireless would base its ‘network management’ on distinctions among its customers’ data plans, rather than on network architecture or technology,” Wheeler wrote.

Verizon later backtracked, announcing it had no plans to revise its throttling.

Topics
Kyle Wiggers
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kyle Wiggers is a writer, Web designer, and podcaster with an acute interest in all things tech. When not reviewing gadgets…
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs Galaxy Z Flip 6: vast chasms between the two
Galaxy Z Flip 6 vs Moto Razr Ultra 2025 cover displays

Samsung is widely regarded as having kick-started the folding phone industry, and the original Galaxy Z Flip proved that folding phones have two widely accepted form factors: book-style and clamshell. Shortly after, Motorola made its long-awaited comeback with a revamp of the iconic Razr V3.

Fast forward a few years, and the flip phone industry looks very different. The Galaxy Z Flip 6 follows the same mold as its predecessors, but unlike the rest of Samsung’s smartphone lineup, it is not the market leader. That falls to Motorola, which just unveiled three new flip phones to challenge the upcoming Galaxy Z Flip 7.

Read more
The Google Pixel Tablet is way more enticing when this deal is applied
Someone holding the Google Pixel Tablet outside. Its screen is turned on.

The Google Pixel Tablet has had a rough go of it. In the past half year we learned of a Google Pixel Tablet 2 that seems to have died in conception, which could very well mean that the original Pixel Tablet will be the last of its kind, at least until a revamp of the line inevitably comes out.

Even the original seemed too confusing at its high original price. But now the price for the tablet alone is $399 and, after a $100 discount, the tablet is down to just $299. Though obvious from a mathematical standpoint, there's a lot psychologically going on when you drop the price from $399 to $299. This is one of those tablet deals that gives a product an entirely new perspective — and others, too, as stock is already limited on Amazon. So, that's what we need to ask, is the Pixel Tablet worth buying now that it is heavily discounted?

Read more
Boox puts stylus support on its new Android tablets with a paper-like screen
Taking notes on the Boox Go 7 e-reader.

Over the past couple of years, Boox has emerged as one of the most ambitious brands in a segment where Amazon’s Kindles have been the go-to choice. The brand makes monochrome and color E Ink devices in a variety of form factors, from the phone-like Palma and compact tablets to ambient-lit slates and monitors.

The latest from Boox are the Go 7 and the second-gen Go Color 7 tablets. Their biggest draw is stylus support, allowing them to double as a digital diary built atop Android. Complementing the pen support is the fantastic Notes app, which offers a ton of features such as pre-made and custom templates, brush variations, handwriting recognition, and more. 

Read more