Skip to main content

Foxconn outguns the competition, reportedly doubles other bids for display maker Sharp

foxconn sharp version 1456367445 head office
Wikimedia Commons
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this article incorrectly described Foxconn as a Chinese company, but it’s actually from Taiwan. We regret this error and have amended the article to fix it

Taiwanese manufacturing giant Foxconn has reportedly offered $5.3 billion to display manufacturer Sharp, as the Japanese company looks for new owners to settle its growing debts and continued operating loss.

It is the second offer Sharp has received, according to the Wall Street Journal, the other comes from the Innovation Network Corporation of Japan (INCJ) — a public-private partnership between the Japanese government and 19 corporations. The board will reportedly review both offers and make a decision on February 4.

Foxconn is attempting to win Sharp’s approval with a much higher offer, over double the value of INCJ’s rumored $2.5 billion bid. It has also tacked on certain favorable conditions, such as paying off the debt that Sharp owes to the Mitsubishi Financial Group and Mizuho Financial Group, which totals between $4.2 and $5.1 billion, according to Standard & Poor. Foxconn will not remove employees from top management positions at Sharp either, states the report. Those two moves seem to appeal to creditors and executives, who will ultimately make the final decision on Sharp’s sale.

Japanese officials are not happy with the possibility of Sharp being sold to a foreign company, especially since the INCJ was set up to help boost the competitiveness of Japanese firms by providing capital and managerial support. INCJ already owns a controlling stake in Japan Display, and according to Reuters the corporation is interested in a merger or partnership between the two companies.

It is not the first time Foxconn has approached Sharp with money, three years ago Foxconn tried to purchase a 10-percent share in the company, but due to Sharp’s stock turmoil, the companies renegotiated the deal. Sharp is the tenth largest television brand in the world, but most of its revenue comes from mobile, large TV, and solar panel manufacturing for third-party products. For example, Sharp was one of the three suppliers for the iPhone 6 display, along with Japan Display and LG Display.

Editors' Recommendations

David Curry
Former Digital Trends Contributor
David has been writing about technology for several years, following the latest trends and covering the largest events. He is…
Apple plans to put more ads on your iPhone, report claims
iOS's App Library page shown on an iPhone 13 Pro.

Apple is planning to put ads in more of the apps that come pre-installed on the iPhone, a new report has claimed.

While the tech giant already includes ads in its News, App Store, and Stocks apps, Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman reported on Sunday that it recently internally tested ads in Apple Maps and could incorporate them into other software such as Podcasts and Books, too.

Read more
iPadOS 16 may not hit your iPad until October, says report
An iPad using Stage Manager in iPadOS 16.

Apple is placingiPadOS 16 on a rather unusual release schedule. Bloomberg reported on Wednesday that the company might delay the launch of the iPad's new software update by about a month, placing it in October.

Usually, Apple releases iPadOS updates at the same time as the iOS updates in September, and they would be pre-installed in new models of their respective devices. For example, iOS 16, which is in the public beta phase, is still slated to come out next month, and it'll be included in the iPhone 14. However, people with knowledge of the matter, who remained anonymous because deliberations were private, told Bloomberg that Apple will hold off on releasing iPadOS 16 until October.

Read more
iPhone 13 comes out on top in new SellCell value depreciation report
A comparison shot of an iPhone, a Pixel 6, and a Samsung Galaxy S22.

The smartphone reseller SellCell has released a new report tracking the value depreciation of the leading phone models on the market, which sees Apple's iPhone 13 come out on top by a significant margin.

SellCell's report compares a range of models of the iPhone 13 (including the Mini, Pro, and Pro Max editions) to Google's Pixel 6/Pro and Samsung's Galaxy S22, S22+, and S22 Ultra. Its methodology involved the analysis of sales data for each smartphone range, considering the typical trade-in value based on units in both "good" and "like-new" conditions.

Read more